Differences in retinal images quality between normal and subclinical keratoconus and its association to posterior corneal asymmetry

Abstract

Purpose

To compare retinal image quality in subclinical keratoconus and normal eyes using a double-pass aberrometer and to correlate it with posterior surface deformation.

Methods

Sixty normal corneas were compared to 20 subclinical keratoconus (SKC) corneas. Retinal image quality was assessed using a double-pass system in all the eyes. The objective scatter index (OSI) modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff, Strehl ratio (SR), and Predicted Visual Acuity (PVA) values at 100%, 20%, and 9% were calculated and compared between the groups. Posterior corneal asymmetry was measured using a combined Placido Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer, and correlations were tested with all optical quality parameters.

Results

Significant decrease in optical quality parameters was observed in SKC eyes compared with that in normal eyes. Subclinical KC eyes expressed greater scattering (OSI = 0.66 ± 0.36 vs 0.47 ± 0.26) and reduced contrast images (MTF and SR) than normal eyes, with 38.82 ± 9.4 and 0.22 ± 0.04, and 44.35 ± 7.1 and 0.24 ± 0.04, respectively. The reduction in the image contrast parameters (MTF and SR) was strongly correlated to the level of posterior corneal asymmetry in SKC. The greater the posterior asymmetry, the more affected was the image contrast, with r = −0.63 and −0.59, respectively for MTF and SR.

Conclusion

Retinal image quality was significantly more affected in eyes with subclinical keratoconus than in normal eyes. The reduction in optical quality observed in subclinical keratoconus was strongly associated with the increased asymmetry of the posterior cornea.

Keywords

Keratoconus optical quality retinal image quality aberrations posterior cornea

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Yang

Rabinowitz

YS.

Keratoconus : classification scheme based on videokeratography and clinical signs. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 1597–1603.

Suzaki

Maeda

Fuchihata

, et al. Visual performance and optical quality of standardized asymmetric soft contact lenses in patients with keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58: 2899–2905.

Lee

Jung

Lee

HK.

Comparison of contact lens corrected quality of vision and life of keratoconus and myopic patients. Korean J Ophthalmol 2017; 31: 489–496.

Smadja

Touboul

Cohen

, et al. Detection of subclinical keratoconus using an automated decision tree classification. Am J Ophthalmol 2013; 156: 237–246.

Saad

Gatinel

Association of corneal indices for the detection of ectasia-susceptible corneas. J Refract Surg 2012; 28: 166; author reply 166-7.

Shetty

Rao

Khamar

, et al. Keratoconus screening indices and their diagnostic ability to distinguish normal from ectatic corneas. Am J Ophthalmol 2017; 181: 140–148.

Saad

Gatinel

Evaluation of total and corneal wavefront high order aberrations for the detection of forme fruste keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; (C): 2978–2992.

Bühren

Kühne

Kohnen

Defining subclinical keratoconus using corneal first-surface higher-order aberrations. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143:3381–3389.

Smadja

Santhiago

Mello

, et al. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus and keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2013; 29: 274–281.

10.

Golan

Hwang

Lang

, et al. Differences in posterior corneal features between normal corneas and subclinical keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2018; 34: 664–670.

11.

Chamberlain

Tan

, et al. Subclinical keratoconus detection by pattern analysis of corneal and epithelial thickness maps with optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42: 284–295.

12.

Reinstein

Cantab

Gobbe

, et al. Epithelial, stromal, and total corneal thickness in keratoconus: three-dimensional display with artemis very-high frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg 2010; 26: 259–272.

13.

Watanabe

Oie

Fujimoto

, et al. Relationship between corneal guttae and quality of vision in patients with mild Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy. Ophthalmology 2015; 122: 2103–2109.

14.

Patel

McLaren

Hodge

, et al. The effect of corneal light scatter on vision after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 146: 913–919.

15.

Buffault

Zéboulon

Liang

, et al. Assessment of corneal epithelial thickness mapping in epithelial basement membrane dystrophy. PLoS One 2020; 15: 1–16.

16.

Montés-Micó

Role of the tear film in the optical quality of the human eye. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 1631–1635.

17.

Diaz-Douton

Benito

Pujol

, et al. Comparison of the retinal image quality with a hartmann-shack wavefront sensor and a double-pass instrument. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 1710–1716.

18.

Saad

Saab

Gatinel

Repeatability of measurements with a double-pass system. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 28–33.

19.

Ondategui

Vilaseca

Arjona

, et al. Optical quality after myopic photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison using a double-pass system. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 16–27.

20.

Tan

C-H

Labbe

Liang

, et al. Dynamic change of optical quality in patients with dry eye disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 2848–2854.

21.

Artal

Benito

Perez

, et al. An objective scatter index based on double-pass retinal images of a point source to classify cataracts. PLoS One 2011; 6: e16823.

22.

Ren

Fan

, et al. Assessment of visual quality in eyes with forme fruste keratoconus and mild and moderate keratoconus based on optical quality analysis system II parameters. J Ophthalmol. 2020; 2020: 7505016.

23.

Ka-Fai Ng

, et al. Optical quality assessment in normal and forme fruste keratoconus eyes with a double-pass system: a comparison and variability study. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98: 1478–1483.

24.

https://www.keelerusa.com/pub/media/productattachments/files/HD-Analyzer-v2.7-Rev1-Cod2-ENGLISH_User_Manual.pdf.

25.

Schwartz

. Visual perception. In: A clinical orientation, 2nd Ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 1999:407.

26.

Kamiya

Shimizu

Igarashi

, et al. Time course of optical quality and intraocular scattering after refractive lenticule extraction. PLoS One 2013; 8: e76738.

27.

Schober

Boer

Schwarte

LA.

Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg 2018; 126: 1763–1768.

28.

Leonard

Gardner

Rocha

, et al. Double-pass retina point imaging for the evaluation of optical light scatter, retinal image quality, and staging of keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2016; 32: 760–765.

29.

Rabinowitz

Rasheed

, et al. Longitudinal study of the normal eyes in unilateral keratoconus patients. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 440–446.

30.

Choi

Wee

Lee

, et al. Changes of ocular higher order aberration in on- and off-eye of rigid gas permeable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 42–51.

31.

Negishi

Kumanomido

Utsumi

, et al. Effect of higher-order aberrations on visual function in keratoconic eyes with a rigid gas permeable contact lens. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 144: 924–929.

32.

Nakagawa

Maeda

Kosaki

, et al. Higher-Order aberrations due to the posterior corneal surface in patients with keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 2660–2665.

33.

Thibos

Hong

Bradley

, et al. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. J Vis 2004;4:329–351.

34.

Awad

Abou Samra

Torky

, et al. Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus. BMC Ophthalmol 2017; 17: 186.

35.

Bradley

Thibos

LN.

Impact of primary spherical aberration, spatial frequency and Stiles crawford apodization on wavefront determined refractive error : a computational study. Ophta Physiol Opt 2013; 33: 444–455.

36.

Borrelli

Frings

Geerling

, et al. Gender-Specific differences in signs and symptoms of dry eye disease. Curr Eye Res 2021; 46: 294–301.

37.

DR H, Maeda

Hannush

SB.

Unilateral keratoconus. Incidence and quantitative topographic analysis. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 1409–1413.

38.

Valdez-Garcia

Sepulveda

Salazar-Martinez

, et al. Prevalence of keratoconus in an adolescent population. Rev Mex Oftalmol 2014; 88: 95–98.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.16 MB

1.11 MB