The limbal stem cells niche (LSCN) is an optimal microenvironment that provides the limbal epithelial stem cells (LESCs) and strictly regulates their proliferation and differentiation. Disturbing the LSCN homeostasis can lead to limbal stem cell dysfunction (LSCD) and subsequent ocular surface aberrations, such as corneal stromal inflammation, persistent epithelial defects, corneal neovascularisation, lymphangiogenesis, corneal opacification, and conjunctivalization. As ocular surface disorders are considered the second main cause of blindness, it becomes crucial to explore different therapeutic strategies for restoring the functions of the LSCN. A major limitation of corneal transplantation is the current shortage of donor tissue to meet the requirements worldwide. In this context, it becomes mandatory to find an alternative regenerative medicine, such as using cultured limbal epithelial/stromal stem cells, inducing the production of corneal like cells by using other sources of stem cells, and using tissue engineering methods aiming to produce the three-dimensional (3D) printed cornea. Limbal epithelial stem cells have been considered the magic potion for eye treatment. Epithelial and stromal stem cells in the limbal niche hold the responsibility of replenishing the corneal epithelium. These stem cells are being used for transplantation to maintain corneal epithelial integrity and ultimately sustain optimal vision. In this review, we summarised the characteristics of the LSCN and their current and future roles in restoring corneal homeostasis in eyes with LSCD.
FunderburghJLFunderburghMLDuY. Stem cells in the limbal stroma. Ocul Surf2016; 14: 113–120.
8.
KureshiAKDziaskoMFunderburghJL,et al.Human corneal stromal stem cells support limbal epithelial cells cultured on RAFT tissue equivalents. Sci Rep2015; 5: 16186.
9.
PinnamaneniNFunderburghJL. Concise review: stem cells in the corneal stroma. Stem Cells2012; 30: 1059–1063.
10.
BasuSDamalaMSinghV. Limbal stromal stem cell therapy for acute and chronic superficial corneal pathologies: early clinical outcomes of the Funderburgh technique. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci2017; 58: 3371–3371.
11.
Van BuskirkEM. The anatomy of the limbus. Eye (Lond). 1989; 3: 101–108.
12.
ZhangLAndersonMCLiuCY. The role of corneal stroma: a potential nutritional source for the cornea. J Nat Sci2017; 3(8):e428.
13.
CotsarelisGChengSZDongG,et al.Existence of slow-cycling limbal epithelial basal cells that can be preferentially stimulated to proliferate: implications on epithelial stem cells. Cell1989; 57: 201–209.
14.
KinoshitaSKiorpesTCFriendJ,et al.Limbal epithelium in ocular surface wound healing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1982; 23: 73–80.
15.
SchermerAGalvinSSunTT. Differentiation-related expression of a major 64K corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells. J Cell Biol1986; 103: 49–62.
16.
DavangerMEvensenA. Role of the pericorneal papillary structure in renewal of corneal epithelium. Nature1971; 229: 560–561.
17.
HallPAWattFM. Stem cells: the generation and maintenance of cellular diversity. Development1989; 106: 619–633.
18.
JosephAHossainPJhamS, et al.Expression of CD34 and L-selectin on human corneal keratocytes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2003; 44: 4689–4692.
19.
UtheimTP. Limbal epithelial cell therapy: past, present, and future. In: WrightBConnonCJ (eds) Corneal regenerative medicine: methods and protocols. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2013, pp.3–43.
20.
BonannoJA. Identity and regulation of ion transport mechanisms in the corneal endothelium. Prog Retin Eye Res2003; 22: 69–94.
ForresterJVDickADMcMenaminPG, et al. Chapter 2 - embryology and early development of the eye and adnexa. In: The eye. 4th ed. London, England: W.B. Saunders, 2016, pp.103–129.e108.
26.
TamuraYKonomiHSawadaH,et al.Tissue distribution of type VIII collagen in human adult and fetal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1991; 32: 2636–2644.
27.
PiatigorskyJ. Multifunctional lens crystallins and corneal enzymes. More than meets the eye. Ann N Y Acad Sci1998; 842: 7–15.
28.
JesterJV. Corneal crystallins and the development of cellular transparency. Semin Cell Dev Biol2008; 19: 82–93.
29.
JesterJVMoller-PedersenTHuangJ, et al.The cellular basis of corneal transparency: evidence for ‘corneal crystallins’. J Cell Sci1999; 112: 613–622.
30.
SugrueSPZieskeJD. ZO1 In corneal epithelium: association to the zonula occludens and adherens junctions. Exp Eye Res1997; 64: 11–20.
31.
WangYChenMWolosinJM. ZO-1 in corneal epithelium; stratal distribution and synthesis induction by outer cell removal. Exp Eye Res1993; 57: 283–292.
32.
YapASMullinJMStevensonBR. Molecular analyses of tight junction physiology: insights and paradoxes. J Membr Biol1998; 163: 159–167.
33.
HuangMWangBWanP, et al.Roles of limbal microvascular net and limbal stroma in regulating maintenance of limbal epithelial stem cells. Cell Tissue Res2015; 359: 547–563.
34.
LagaliNGermundssonJFagerholmP. The role of Bowman’s layer in corneal regeneration after phototherapeutic keratectomy: a prospective study using in vivo confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2009; 50: 4192–4198.
35.
WilsonSEHongJW. Bowman’s layer structure and function: critical or dispensable to corneal function? A hypothesis. Cornea2000; 19: 417–420.
36.
MeekKMDennisSKhanS. Changes in the refractive index of the stroma and its extrafibrillar matrix when the cornea swells. Biophys J2003; 85: 2205–2212.
37.
PuangsricharernVTsengSC. Cytologic evidence of corneal diseases with limbal stem cell deficiency. Ophthalmology1995; 102: 1476–1485.
38.
CooperDSchermerASunTT. Classification of human epithelia and their neoplasms using monoclonal antibodies to keratins: strategies, applications, and limitations. Lab Invest1985; 52: 243–256.
39.
ZieskeJDBukusogluGYankauckasMA. Characterization of a potential marker of corneal epithelial stem cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1992; 33: 143–152.
40.
LindbergKBrownMEChavesHV,et al.In vitro propagation of human ocular surface epithelial cells for transplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1993; 34: 2672–2679.
41.
EbatoBFriendJThoftRA. Comparison of limbal and peripheral human corneal epithelium in tissue culture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1988; 29: 1533–1537.
42.
DelMonteDWKimT. Anatomy and physiology of the cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg2011; 37: 588–598.
43.
ReinsteinDZYapTEArcherTJ,et al.Comparison of corneal epithelial thickness measurement between Fourier-domain OCT and very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg2015; 31: 438–445.
44.
ReinsteinDZArcherTJGobbeM,et al.Stromal thickness in the normal cornea: three-dimensional display with artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg2009; 25: 776–786.
45.
DuYSundarrajNFunderburghML,et al.Secretion and organization of a cornea-like tissue in vitro by stem cells from human corneal stroma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2007; 48: 5038–5045.
46.
Schlotzer-SchrehardtUKruseFE. Identification and characterization of limbal stem cells. Exp Eye Res2005; 81: 247–264.
47.
DuaHSShanmuganathanVAPowell-RichardsAO,et al.Limbal epithelial crypts: a novel anatomical structure and a putative limbal stem cell niche. Br J Ophthalmol2005; 89: 529–532.
48.
KulkarniBBTighePJMohammedI, et al.Comparative transcriptional profiling of the limbal epithelial crypt demonstrates its putative stem cell niche characteristics. BMC Genomics2010; 11: 526.
49.
MolvaerRKAndreasenAHeegaardS, et al.Interactive 3D computer model of the human corneolimbal region: crypts, projections and stem cells. Acta Ophthalmol2013; 91: 457–462.
50.
ShorttAJSeckerGAMunroPM,et al.Characterization of the limbal epithelial stem cell niche: novel imaging techniques permit in vivo observation and targeted biopsy of limbal epithelial stem cells. Stem Cells2007; 25: 1402–1409.
51.
HaagdorensMVan AckerSIVan GerwenV, et al.Limbal stem cell deficiency: current treatment options and emerging therapies. Stem Cells Int2016; 2016: 9798374.
52.
HigaKShimmuraSMiyashitaH,et al.Melanocytes in the corneal limbus interact with K19-positive basal epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res2005; 81: 218–223.
53.
ChenZde PaivaCSLuoL,et al.Characterization of putative stem cell phenotype in human limbal epithelia. Stem Cells2004; 22: 355–366.
54.
WestJD. Commentary: lineage tracing supports maintenance of the corneal epithelium by limbal epithelial stem cells. Stem Cells2015; 33: 310–311.
55.
HashmaniKBranchMJSidneyLE, et al.Characterization of corneal stromal stem cells with the potential for epithelial transdifferentiation. Stem Cell Res Ther2013; 4: 75.
56.
LiYInoueTTakamatsuF, et al.Differences between niche cells and limbal stromal cells in maintenance of corneal limbal stem cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2014; 55: 1453–1462.
57.
PolisettyNFatimaAMadhiraSL,et al.Mesenchymal cells from limbal stroma of human eye. Mol Vis2008; 14: 431–442.
58.
SimmonsPJTorok-StorbB. CD34 Expression by stromal precursors in normal human adult bone marrow. Blood1991; 78: 2848–2853.
59.
BrayLJHeazlewoodCFMunsterDJ,et al.Immunosuppressive properties of mesenchymal stromal cell cultures derived from the limbus of human and rabbit corneas. Cytotherapy2014; 16: 64–73.
60.
BooteCDuYMorganS, et al.Quantitative assessment of ultrastructure and light scatter in mouse corneal debridement wounds. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2012; 53: 2786–2795.
West-MaysJADwivediDJ. The keratocyte: corneal stromal cell with variable repair phenotypes. Int J Biochem Cell Biol2006; 38: 1625–1631.
63.
DuYFunderburghMLMannMM,et al.Multipotent stem cells in human corneal stroma. Stem Cells2005; 23: 1266–1275.
64.
BranchMJHashmaniKDhillonP,et al.Mesenchymal stem cells in the human corneal limbal stroma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2012; 53: 5109–5116.
65.
WakitaniSGotoTPinedaSJ, et al.Mesenchymal cell-based repair of large, full-thickness defects of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am1994; 76: 579–592.
66.
PittengerMFMackayAMBeckSC, et al.Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science1999; 284: 143–147.
67.
JesterJVHo-ChangJ. Modulation of cultured corneal keratocyte phenotype by growth factors/cytokines control in vitro contractility and extracellular matrix contraction. Exp Eye Res2003; 77: 581–592.
68.
ChenJGuerrieroESadoY,et al.Rho-mediated regulation of TGF-beta1- and FGF-2-induced activation of corneal stromal keratocytes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2009; 50: 3662–3670.
69.
FiniME. Keratocyte and fibroblast phenotypes in the repairing cornea. Prog Retin Eye Res1999; 18: 529–551.
Di IorioEBarbaroVRuzzaA,et al.Isoforms of DeltaNp63 and the migration of ocular limbal cells in human corneal regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2005; 102: 9523–9528.
74.
ZhouSSchuetzJDBuntingKD, et al.The ABC transporter Bcrp1/ABCG2 is expressed in a wide variety of stem cells and is a molecular determinant of the side-population phenotype. Nat Med2001; 7: 1028–1034.
75.
WatanabeKNishidaKYamatoM, et al.Human limbal epithelium contains side population cells expressing the ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2. FEBS Lett2004; 565: 6–10.
76.
SteppMAZhuLSheppardD,et al.Localized distribution of alpha 9 integrin in the cornea and changes in expression during corneal epithelial cell differentiation. J Histochem Cytochem1995; 43: 353–362.
77.
HayashiRYamatoMSugiyamaH, et al.N-Cadherin is expressed by putative stem/progenitor cells and melanocytes in the human limbal epithelial stem cell niche. Stem Cells2007; 25: 289–296.
78.
QiHLiDQShineHD, et al.Nerve growth factor and its receptor TrkA serve as potential markers for human corneal epithelial progenitor cells. Exp Eye Res2008; 86: 34–40.
79.
ThomasPBLiuYHZhuangFF, et al.Identification of Notch-1 expression in the limbal basal epithelium. Mol Vis2007; 13: 337–344.
80.
LauwerynsBvan den OordJJMissottenL. The transitional zone between limbus and peripheral cornea. An immunohistochemical study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1993; 34: 1991–1999.
81.
KimHSJun SongXde PaivaCS,et al.Phenotypic characterization of human corneal epithelial cells expanded ex vivo from limbal explant and single cell cultures. Exp Eye Res2004; 79: 41–49.
82.
DongYRoosMGruijtersT, et al.Differential expression of two gap junction proteins in corneal epithelium. Eur J Cell Biol1994; 64: 95–100.
83.
ZieskeJD. Perpetuation of stem cells in the eye. Eye (Lond)1994; 8: 163–169.
84.
LiuZCarvajalMCarrawayCA,et al.Expression of the receptor tyrosine kinases, epidermal growth factor receptor, ErbB2, and ErbB3, in human ocular surface epithelia. Cornea2001; 20: 81–85.
85.
JonesPHWattFM. Separation of human epidermal stem cells from transit amplifying cells on the basis of differences in integrin function and expression. Cell1993; 73: 713–724.
86.
PerrellaGBrusiniPSpelatR,et al.Expression of haematopoietic stem cell markers, CD133 and CD34 on human corneal keratocytes. Br J Ophthalmol2007; 91: 94–99.
87.
SosnovaMBradlMForresterJV. CD34+ corneal stromal cells are bone marrow-derived and express hemopoietic stem cell markers. Stem Cells2005; 23: 507–515.
PellegriniGDellambraEGolisanoO, et al.P63 identifies keratinocyte stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2001; 98: 3156–3161.
90.
GirardMTMatsubaraMFiniME. Transforming growth factor-beta and interleukin-1 modulate metalloproteinase expression by corneal stromal cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1991; 32: 2441–2454.
91.
GrantMBKhawPTSchultzGS,et al.Effects of epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and transforming growth factor-beta on corneal cell chemotaxis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1992; 33: 3292–3301.
92.
AndresenJLLedetTEhlersN. Keratocyte migration and peptide growth factors: the effect of PDGF, bFGF, EGF, IGF-I, aFGF and TGF-beta on human keratocyte migration in a collagen gel. Curr Eye Res1997; 16: 605–613.
93.
PancholiSTulloAKhaliqA,et al.The effects of growth factors and conditioned media on the proliferation of human corneal epithelial cells and keratocytes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol1998; 236: 1–8.
94.
KayEPLeeHKParkKS,et al.Indirect mitogenic effect of transforming growth factor-beta on cell proliferation of subconjunctival fibroblasts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1998; 39: 481–486.
95.
KayEPLeeMSSeongGJ,et al.TGF-beta s stimulate cell proliferation via an autocrine production of FGF-2 in corneal stromal fibroblasts. Curr Eye Res1998; 17: 286–293.
96.
KamiyamaKIguchiIWangX,et al.Effects of PDGF on the migration of rabbit corneal fibroblasts and epithelial cells. Cornea1998; 17: 315–325.
97.
AndresenJLEhlersN. Chemotaxis of human keratocytes is increased by platelet-derived growth factor-BB, epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor-alpha, acidic fibroblast growth factor, insulin-like growth factor-I, and transforming growth factor-beta. Curr Eye Res1998; 17: 79–87.
98.
KimWJMohanRRMohanRR,et al.Effect of PDGF, IL-1alpha, and BMP2/4 on corneal fibroblast chemotaxis: expression of the platelet-derived growth factor system in the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1999; 40: 1364–1372.
99.
SternMEWaltzKMBeurermanRW, et al.Effect of platelet-derived growth factor on rabbit corneal wound healing. Wound Repair Regen1995; 3: 59–65.
100.
BaldwinHCMarshallJ. Growth factors in corneal wound healing following refractive surgery: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand2002; 80: 238–247.
101.
CarringtonLMBoultonM. Hepatocyte growth factor and keratinocyte growth factor regulation of epithelial and stromal corneal wound healing. J Cataract Refract Surg2005; 31: 412–423.
102.
JungJCHuhMIFiniME. Constitutive collagenase-1 synthesis through MAPK pathways is mediated, in part, by endogenous IL-1alpha during fibrotic repair in corneal stroma. J Cell Biochem2007; 102: 453–462.
103.
HuhMIKimYHParkJH, et al.Distribution of TGF-beta isoforms and signaling intermediates in corneal fibrotic wound repair. J Cell Biochem2009; 108: 476–488.
104.
MilaniBYMilaniFYParkDW, et al.Rapamycin inhibits the production of myofibroblasts and reduces corneal scarring after photorefractive keratectomy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2013; 54: 7424–7430.
105.
SinghVJainiRTorricelliAA, et al.TGFbeta and PDGF-B signaling blockade inhibits myofibroblast development from both bone marrow-derived and keratocyte-derived precursor cells in vivo. Exp Eye Res2014; 121: 35–40.
106.
CarlsonECWangIJLiuCY,et al.Altered KSPG expression by keratocytes following corneal injury. Mol Vis2003; 9: 615–623.
107.
WengJMohanRRLiQ,et al.IL-1 upregulates keratinocyte growth factor and hepatocyte growth factor mRNA and protein production by cultured stromal fibroblast cells: interleukin-1 beta expression in the cornea. Cornea1997; 16: 465–471.
108.
West-MaysJASadowPMTobinTW,et al.Repair phenotype in corneal fibroblasts is controlled by an interleukin-1 alpha autocrine feedback loop. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1997; 38: 1367–1379.
109.
MaycockNJMarshallJ. Genomics of corneal wound healing: a review of the literature. Acta Ophthalmol2014; 92: e170–e184.
110.
LimMGoldsteinMHTuliS,et al.Growth factor, cytokine and protease interactions during corneal wound healing. Ocul Surf2003; 1: 53–65.
TorricelliAAWilsonSE. Cellular and extracellular matrix modulation of corneal stromal opacity. Exp Eye Res2014; 129: 151–160.
113.
SinghVAgrawalVSanthiagoMR,et al.Stromal fibroblast-bone marrow-derived cell interactions: implications for myofibroblast development in the cornea. Exp Eye Res2012; 98: 1–8.
114.
ShirzadehEHeidari KeshelSEzzatizadehV,et al.Unrestricted somatic stem cells, as a novel feeder layer: ex vivo culture of human limbal stem cells. J Cell Biochem2018; 119: 2666–2678.
115.
MajoFRochatANicolasM,et al.Oligopotent stem cells are distributed throughout the mammalian ocular surface. Nature2008; 456: 250–254.
116.
RovidaEPeppicelliSBonoS, et al.The metabolically-modulated stem cell niche: a dynamic scenario regulating cancer cell phenotype and resistance to therapy. Cell Cycle2014; 13: 3169–3175.
117.
PlikusMVMayerJAde la CruzD, et al.Cyclic dermal BMP signalling regulates stem cell activation during hair regeneration. Nature2008; 451: 340–344.
118.
GrecoVChenTRendlM, et al.A two-step mechanism for stem cell activation during hair regeneration. Cell Stem Cell2009; 4: 155–169.
AcevesSSAckermanSJ. Relationships between eosinophilic inflammation, tissue remodeling, and fibrosis in eosinophilic esophagitis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am2009; 29: 197–211. xiii-xiv.
121.
BonnansCChouJWerbZ. Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol2014; 15: 786–801.
122.
NotaraMAlatzaAGilfillanJ, et al.In sickness and in health: corneal epithelial stem cell biology, pathology and therapy. Exp Eye Res2010; 90: 188–195.
123.
GrivennikovSIGretenFRKarinM. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell2010; 140: 883–899.
124.
RamaeshTRamaeshKMartin CollinsonJ,et al.Developmental and cellular factors underlying corneal epithelial dysgenesis in the Pax6+/- mouse model of aniridia. Exp Eye Res2005; 81: 224–235.
125.
SejpalKBakhtiariPDengSX. Presentation, diagnosis and management of limbal stem cell deficiency. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol2013; 20: 5–10.
126.
BarbaroVFerrariSFasoloA, et al.Evaluation of ocular surface disorders: a new diagnostic tool based on impression cytology and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Br J Ophthalmol2010; 94: 926–932.
127.
GarciaIEtxebarriaJBoto-de-Los-BueisA, et al.Comparative study of limbal stem cell deficiency diagnosis methods: detection of MUC5AC mRNA and goblet cells in corneal epithelium. Ophthalmology2012; 119: 923–929.
128.
De LucaMPellegriniGGreenH. Regeneration of squamous epithelia from stem cells of cultured grafts. Regen Med2006; 1: 45–57.
129.
AhmadSStewartRYungS, et al.Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into corneal epithelial-like cells by in vitro replication of the corneal epithelial stem cell niche. Stem Cells2007; 25: 1145–1155.
130.
Shalom-FeuersteinRSerrorLDe La Forest DivonneS, et al.Pluripotent stem cell model reveals essential roles for miR-450b-5p and miR-184 in embryonic corneal lineage specification. Stem Cells2012; 30: 898–909.
131.
ElhusseinyAMSoleimaniMEleiwaTK, et al.Current and emerging therapies for limbal stem cell deficiency. Stem Cells Trans Med2022; 11: 259–268.
132.
YazdanpanahGHaqZKangK,et al.Strategies for reconstructing the limbal stem cell niche. Ocul Surf2019; 17: 230–240.
133.
FernandesMSangwanVSRaoSK, et al.Limbal stem cell transplantation. Indian J Ophthalmol2004; 52: 5–22.
HarthanJS. Therapeutic use of mini-scleral lenses in a patient with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. J Optom2014; 7: 62–66.
136.
AzariAARapuanoCJ. Autologous serum eye drops for the treatment of ocular surface disease. Eye Contact Lens2015; 41: 133–140.
137.
RauzSSawVP. Serum eye drops, amniotic membrane and limbal epithelial stem cells--tools in the treatment of ocular surface disease. Cell Tissue Bank2010; 11: 13–27.
138.
GeerlingGDanielsJTDartJK,et al.Toxicity of natural tear substitutes in a fully defined culture model of human corneal epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2001; 42: 948–956.
139.
AkcamHTUnluMKaracaEE,et al.Autologous serum eye-drops and enhanced epithelial healing time after photorefractive keratectomy. Clin Exp Optom2018; 101: 34–37.
140.
HoTCChenSLWuJY, et al.PEDF Promotes self-renewal of limbal stem cell and accelerates corneal epithelial wound healing. Stem Cells2013; 31: 1775–1784.
SangwanVSBurmanSTejwaniS,et al.Amniotic membrane transplantation: a review of current indications in the management of ophthalmic disorders. Indian J Ophthalmol2007; 55: 251–260.
143.
LeQDengSX. The application of human amniotic membrane in the surgical management of limbal stem cell deficiency. Ocul Surf2019; 17: 221–229.
144.
NguyenKNBobbaSRichardsonA, et al.Native and synthetic scaffolds for limbal epithelial stem cell transplantation. Acta Biomater2018; 65: 21–35.
145.
LevisHJBrownRADanielsJT. Plastic compressed collagen as a biomimetic substrate for human limbal epithelial cell culture. Biomaterials2010; 31: 7726–7737.
146.
BrownKDLowSMariappanI, et al.Plasma polymer-coated contact lenses for the culture and transfer of corneal epithelial cells in the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency. Tissue Eng Part A2014; 20: 646–655.
147.
KangKBLawrenceBDGaoXR, et al.Micro- and nanoscale topographies on silk regulate gene expression of human corneal epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2017; 58: 6388–6398.
148.
KangKRosenblattMD’jalilianA. Novel approaches for restoring the function of the limbal stem cell niche. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2019, pp.241–247.
Baradaran-RafiiAAkbariMShirzadehE,et al.Single block conjunctival limbal autograft for unilateral total limbal stem cell deficiency. J Ophthalmic Vis Res2015; 10: 90–92.
153.
DuaHSAzuara-BlancoA. Autologous limbal transplantation in patients with unilateral corneal stem cell deficiency. Br J Ophthalmol2000; 84: 273–278.
154.
GhareebAELakoMFigueiredoFC. Recent advances in stem cell therapy for limbal stem cell deficiency: a narrative review. Ophthalmol Ther2020; 9: 809–831.
155.
BaylisOFigueiredoFHeneinC,et al.13 Years of cultured limbal epithelial cell therapy: a review of the outcomes. J Cell Biochem2011; 112: 993–1002.
156.
PellegriniGTraversoCEFranziAT,et al.Long-term restoration of damaged corneal surfaces with autologous cultivated corneal epithelium. Lancet1997; 349: 990–993.
157.
ZakariaNPossemiersTDhubhghaillSN, et al.Results of a phase I/II clinical trial: standardized, non-xenogenic, cultivated limbal stem cell transplantation. J Transl Med2014; 12: 58.
158.
ShorttAJSeckerGANotaraMD, et al.Transplantation of ex vivo cultured limbal epithelial stem cells: a review of techniques and clinical results. Surv Ophthalmol2007; 52: 483–502.
159.
ShorttAJTuftSJDanielsJT. Ex vivo cultured limbal epithelial transplantation. A clinical perspective. Ocul Surf2010; 8: 80–90.
160.
SangwanVSBasuSMacNeilS,et al.Simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET): a novel surgical technique for the treatment of unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency. Br J Ophthalmol2012; 96: 931–934.
161.
BhalekarSBasuSLalI,et al.Successful autologous simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET) in previously failed paediatric limbal transplantation for ocular surface burns. BMJ Case Rep2013; 2013: bcr2013009888.
162.
VaziraniJAliMHSharmaN, et al.Autologous simple limbal epithelial transplantation for unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency: multicentre results. Br J Ophthalmol2016; 100: 1416–1420.
163.
NakamuraTEndoKCooperLJ, et al.The successful culture and autologous transplantation of rabbit oral mucosal epithelial cells on amniotic membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2003; 44: 106–116.
164.
KolliSAhmadSMudharHS,et al.Successful application of ex vivo expanded human autologous oral mucosal epithelium for the treatment of total bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency. Stem Cells2014; 32: 2135–2146.
165.
KiritoshiSOieYNampeiK,et al.Anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography in patients following cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol2019; 208: 242–250.
166.
RicardoJRCristovamPCFilhoPA, et al.Transplantation of conjunctival epithelial cells cultivated ex vivo in patients with total limbal stem cell deficiency. Cornea2013; 32: 221–228.
167.
PutraIShenXAnwarKN, et al.Preclinical evaluation of the safety and efficacy of cryopreserved bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells for corneal repair. Transl Vis Sci Technol2021; 10: 3–3.
168.
CalongeMPérezIGalindoS, et al.A proof-of-concept clinical trial using mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of corneal epithelial stem cell deficiency. Transl Res2019; 206: 18–40.
169.
SasamotoYKsanderBRFrankMH,et al.Repairing the corneal epithelium using limbal stem cells or alternative cell-based therapies. Expert Opin Biol Ther2018; 18: 505–513.
