Abstract
Purpose
To conduct a review of glaucoma management in France
Method
A 15-question survey was sent to ophthalmologists listed in the journal Réalités Ophtalmologiques and the Syndicat National des Ophtalmologues de France.
Results
459/471 responses were analyzed. Gonioscopy was performed by 64.7% of respondents with a Goldmann three-mirror lens, by 51.4% with a four-mirror lens, and 8.2% preferred to perform the procedure with anterior segment imaging. The visual field was reported to be interpreted without difficulty by 87.8% of the practitioners, and 54.0% utilize a progression software. Ultrasound biomicroscopy was reported to be interpreted without difficulty by 20.0% of practitioners. In cases of severe ocular hypertonia with flat bleb in early postoperative trabeculectomy, 61.7% chose ocular massage as a first-line treatment, 52.9% chose laser suture lysis, 50.5% utilized needling, and 24.8% employed hypotonizing eyedrops. In case of severe ocular hypertonia with flat bleb in early postoperative deep sclerectomy, 53.2% chose goniopuncture as their first treatment, 34.4% employed needling, 31.8% utilized ocular massage, and 23.3% chose hypotonizing eyedrops. The selective laser trabeculoplasty is used as soon as the diagnosis is made by 37.5%, in association with a mono or dual therapy by 93.2%, after trying different combinations of eyedrops by 45.5%, when the visual field deteriorates despite a normalized intraocular pressure by 46.6%, and in cases of hypertonia after filtering surgery by 19.2%. Concerning management for primary angle-closure glaucoma, 80.8% considered peripheral iridotomy, and 18.7% utilized cataract surgery.
Conclusion
The diversity of responses concerning glaucoma management should draw attention to the need for standardized practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
