In recent years, with the gradual maturation of myopia correction surgery, the changes in binocular visual function after surgery have attracted widespread attention. The accommodation of facility, the amplitude of accommodation, relative accommodation, and accommodation convergence/accommodation assembly are essential parameters for assessing binocular visual function. The changes in these parameters are significant for guiding patients in the design of the preoperative surgical approach and alleviating postoperative visual fatigue. This paper aims to guide the preoperative assessment, design, and postoperative visual training of refractive surgery in myopic patients from the perspective of changes in binocular visual function before and after myopia and surgery, which can improve accommodation and convergence function in patients after refractive surgery.
HoldenBAFrickeTRWilsonDA, et al.Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology2016; 123(5): 1036–1042.
2.
MorganIGFrenchANAshbyRS, et al.The epidemics of myopia: aetiology and prevention. Prog Retin Eye Res2018; 62: 134–149.
3.
DishlerJGSladeSSeifertS, et al.Small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of myopia with astigmatism: outcomes of the United States food and drug administration premarket approval clinical trial. Ophthalmology2020; 127(8): 1020–1034.
4.
HanTXuYHanX, et al.Three-year outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism. Br J Ophthalmol2019; 103(4): 565–568.
5.
CaoKLiuLYuT, et al.Changes in corneal biomechanics during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Lasers Med Sci2020; 35(3): 599–609.
6.
LiSMZhanSLiSY, et al.Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for correction of myopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2016; 2(2): CD009799.
7.
MozayanAMaduAChannaP. Laser in-situ keratomileusis infection: review and update of current practices. Curr Opin Ophthalmol2011; 22(4): 233–237.
8.
WajuihianSOHansrajR. Accommodative anomalies in a sample of black high school students in South Africa. Ophthalmic Epidemiol2016; 23(5): 316–323.
9.
Heath GG. Components of accommodation. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom1956; 33(11): 569–579.
10.
AllenPMLearyDJ. Accommodation functions: co-dependency and relationship to refractive error. Vision Res2006; 46(4): 491–505.
11.
KarimianFBaradaran-RafiiABagheriA, et al.Accommodative changes after photorefractive keratectomy in myopic eyes. Optom Vis Sci2010; 87(11): 833–838.
12.
ZhengKHanTZhouX. Accommodative changes after SMILE for moderate to high myopia correction. BMC Ophthalmol2016; 16(1): 173.
13.
LiuLYuanJLiJ, et al.Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on accommodation. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci2008; 28(5): 596–598.
14.
ShorttAJA. Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2013; (2) 1080.
15.
ChenMLongQGuH,et al.Accommodation changes after visian implantable collamer lens with central hole for high myopia: a STROBE-compliant article. Medicine (Baltimore)2019; 98(28): e16434.
16.
ChengXXuJBrennanNA. Accommodation and its role in myopia progression and control with soft contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt2019; 39(3): 162–171.
17.
Pereira-da-MotaAFCostaJAmorim-de-SousaA, et al.The impact of overnight orthokeratology on accommodative response in myopic subjects. J Clin Med2020; 9(11):3687.
18.
JiménezRMartínez-AlmeidaLSalasC, et al.Contact lenses vs spectacles in myopes: is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function?. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol2011; 249(6): 925–935.
19.
HashemiHSametBMirzajaniA, et al.Near point of accommodation and convergence after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. Binocul Vis Strabolog Q Simms Romano2013; 28(1): 29–35.
20.
AğcaADemirokAYıldırımY, et al.Refractive lenticule extraction (ReLEx) through a small incision (SMILE) for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: current perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol2016; 10: 1905–1912.
21.
AirianiSBraunsteinRE. Accommodative spasm after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Am J Ophthalmol2006; 141(6): 1163–1164.
22.
KamiyaKShimizuKAizawaD, et al.Time course of accommodation after implantable collamer lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol2008; 146(5): 674–678.
23.
WeiSWangY. Comparison of corneal sensitivity between FS-LASIK and femtosecond lenticule extraction (ReLEx flex) or small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx smile) for myopic eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ohthalmol2013; 251(6): 1645–1654.
24.
GuberIMouvetVBerginC,et al.Clinical outcomes and cataract formation rates in eyes 10 years after posterior phakic lens implantation for myopia. JAMA Ophthalmol2016; 134(5): 487–494.
25.
AndersonHStuebingKKFernKD, et al.Ten-year changes in fusional vergence, phoria, and nearpoint of convergence in myopic children. Optom Vis Sci2011; 88(9): 1060–1065.
26.
SreenivasanVIrvingELBobierWR. Effect of heterophoria type and myopia on accommodative and vergence responses during sustained near activity in children. Vision Res2012; 57: 9–17.
27.
SreenivasanVIrvingELBobierWR. Binocular adaptation to +2 D lenses in myopic and emmetropic children. Optom Vis Sci2009; 86(6): 731–740.
28.
GwiazdaJThornFHeldR. Accommodation, accommodative convergence, and response AC/A ratios before and at the onset of myopia in children. Optom Vis Sci2005; 82(4): 273–278.
29.
MuttiDOMitchellGLJones-JordanLA, et al.The response AC/A ratio before and after the onset of myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2017; 58(3): 1594–1602.
30.
MuttiDOJonesLAMoeschbergerML, et al.AC/A ratio, age, and refractive error in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2000; 41(9): 2469–2478.
31.
PrakashGChoudharyVSharmaN, et al.Change in the accommodative convergence per unit of accommodation ratio after bilateral laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia in orthotropic patients: prospective evaluation. J Cataract Refract Surg2007; 33(12): 2054–2056.
32.
Hoseini-YazdiSHYektaANouriH,et al.Frequency of convergence and accommodative disorders in a clinical population of Mashhad, Iran. Strabismus2015; 23(1): 22–29.
33.
RyuIHHanJLeeHK, et al.Changes in the accommodation-convergence relationship after the Artisan phakic intraocular lens implantation for myopic patients. Korean J Ophthalmol2014; 28(2): 150–154.
34.
SreenivasanVIrvingELBobierWR. Can current models of accommodation and vergence predict accommodative behavior in myopic children?. Vision Res2014; 101: 51–61.
35.
HutchinsonAKSerafinoMNucciP. Photorefractive keratectomy for the treatment of purely refractive accommodative esotropia: 6 years experience. Br J Ophthalmol2010; 94(2): 236–240.
36.
SabettiLSpadeaL, et al.Photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis in refractive accommodative esotropia. J Cataract Refract Surg2005; 31(10): 1899–1903.
37.
WickBHallP. Relation among accommodative facility, lag, and amplitude in elementary school children. Am J Optom Physiol Opt1987; 64(8): 593–598.
38.
ZhangHWangY. Dry eye evaluation and correlation analysis between tear film stability and corneal surface regularity after small incision lenticule extraction. Int Ophthalmol2018; 38(6): 2283–2288.
39.
HanJHongSLeeS, et al.Changes in fusional vergence amplitudes after laser refractive surgery for moderate myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg2014; 40(10): 1670–1675.
40.
WangBNaiduRKChuR, et al.Dry eye disease following refractive surgery: a 12-month follow-up of SMILE versus FS-LASIK in high myopia. J Ophthalmol2015; 2015: 132417.
41.
KushnerBJKowalL. Diplopia after refractive surgery: occurrence and prevention. Arch Ophthalmol2003; 121(3): 315–321.
42.
Cacho MartínezPGarcía MuñozARuiz-CanteroMT. Treatment of accommodative and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions: a systematic review. Optometry2009; 80(12): 702–716.
43.
MaMMShiJLiN, et al.Effect of vision therapy on accommodative lag in myopic children: a randomized clinical trial. Optom Vis Sci2019; 96: 17–26.
