Long-term efficacy and safety profiles following small incision lenticule extraction in eyes with ≥ 5-year follow-up

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate long-term efficacy, safety, predictability and stability (refractive and keratometric) of myopic and myopic astigmatism correction with Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).

Methods

Single center retrospective review of eyes undergoing SMILE from 2012–2015. Forty-two eyes (23 patients) with ≥ 5-year follow-up. Variables analyzed were preoperative, 3-month, 1-year and last follow-up uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, spherical equivalent (SE) and mean keratometry. Descriptive statistics were performed and results reported following the Standard for Reporting Astigmatism Outcomes.

Results

Mean follow-up of 5.98 ± 0.90 years. Mean preoperative SE was −5.26 ± 1.22D (range −2.50 to −8.12D). Mean preoperative cylinder was −0.66 ± 0.61D (range 0.00 to −2.25D). Efficacy and safety indices were 0.86 and 0.98, respectively. In total, 81% of operated eyes achieved an UDVA of ≥ 0.09 logMar (20/25 Snellen). At the last follow-up, ≥1 line of CDVA was gained in 14% of eyes. Five percent lost 1 line of CDVA, and no eye loss ≥2 lines of CDVA. Sixty-nine percent of eyes were within ± 0.50D and 86% within ± 1.00D of the attempted SE correction. Ninety-one percent of eyes had ≤0.50D of postoperative astigmatism and 71% were within ± 15° from the intended correction axis. At the final follow-up, a statistically significant myopic regression of 0.19 ± 0.50D was observed (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Long-term results demonstrate that SMILE is effective, predictable and safe. SMILE has good stability, low regression compared to LASIK, and no signs of corneal ectasia staging within our standard criteria.

Keywords

Corneal procedures for myopia < REFRACTIVE SURGERY corneal procedures for astigmatism < REFRACTIVE SURGERY REFRACTIVE SURGERY complications of refractive surgery < REFRACTIVE SURGERY laser biophysics < REFRACTIVE SURGERY

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sekundo

Kunert

Russmann

, et al. First efficacy and safety study of femtosecond lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia. Six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 1513–1520.

Sekundo

Kunert

Blum

. Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 2011; 95: 335–339.

Shah

Sengupta

. Results of small incision lenticule extraction: all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg [Internet] 2011; 37: 127–137. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.033. Available from: .

Sánchez-González

Alonso-Aliste

. Visual and refractive outcomes of 100 small incision lenticule extractions (SMILE) in moderate and high myopia: a 24-month follow-up study. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019; 257: 1561–1567.

Sekundo

Gertnere

Bertelmann

, et al. One-year refractive results, contrast sensitivity, high-order aberrations and complications after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE). Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014; 252: 837–843.

Huang

Zhong

. Central corneal sensitivity after small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. BMC Ophthalmol [Internet] 2015; 15: 1–6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0129-5. Available from: .

Liu

Chen

Wang

, et al. Clinical outcomes after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism: a prospective randomized comparative study. Cornea 2016; 35: 210–216.

Guo

Hosseini-Moghaddam

Hodge

. Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 2019; 19: 167.

Kobashi

Kamiya

Shimizu

. Dry Eye after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK: meta-analysis. Cornea 2017; 36: 85–91.

10.

Shen

Zhu

Song

, et al. Dry eye after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11: 1–14.

11.

Blum

Täubig

Gruhn

, et al. Five-year results of small incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE). Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 1192–1195.

12.

Han

Zheng

Chen

, et al. Four-year observation of predictability and stability of small incision lenticule extraction. BMC Ophthalmol 2016; 16: 1–8.

13.

Xia

Qin

Shang

, et al. Four-Year outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction for extreme high myopia and myopic astigmatism. Front Med 2020; 7: 1–7.

14.

Aygün

Çankaya

Kİ

Ağca

, et al. Five-year outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction vs femtosecond laser–assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: a contralateral eye study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2020; 46: 403–409.

15.

Aǧca

Çakir

Tülü Aygün

, et al. Visual and refractive outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction in high myopia: 5-year results. J Ophthalmol 2018; 2018: 1-6.

16.

Yildirim

Çakmak

Sucu

, et al. Comparative study of small-incision lenticule extraction and phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of high myopia: 6-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2021; 47: 221–226.

17.

Blum

Lauer

Kunert

, et al. 10-Year Results of small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg 2019; 35: 618–623.

18.

Reinstein

Archer

Randleman

. JRS Standard for reporting astigmatism outcomes of refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2014; 30: 654–659.

19.

Dupps

Kohnen

Mamalis

, et al. Standardized graphs and terms for refractive surgery results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 1–3.

20.

Chen

, et al. Five-year results of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK (FS-LASIK) for myopia. Acta Ophthalmol 2019; 97: e373–e380.

21.

Zhang

Shen

Jia

, et al. Clinical outcomes of SMILE and FS-LASIK used to treat myopia: a meta-analysis. J Refract Surg 2015; 32: 256–265.

22.

Yildirim

Olcucu

Alagoz

, et al. Visual and refractive outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia. J Refract Surg 2016; 32: 604–610.

23.

Pedersen

Ivarsen

Hjortdal

. Three-year results of small incision lenticule extraction for high myopia: refractive outcomes and aberrations. J Refract Surg 2015; 31: 719–724.

24.

Han

Shang

Zhou

, et al. Refractive outcomes comparing small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2020; 46: 419–427.

25.

Tervo

TMT

Holopainen

. Seven-year follow-up of LASIK for myopia waldir neira zalentein. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 312–318.

26.

Sekundo

Bönicke

Mattausch

, et al. Six-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate and extreme myopia using a first-generation excimer laser and microkeratome. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 1152–1158.

27.

Ikeda

Shimizu

Igarashi

, et al. Twelve-Year follow-Up of Laser In situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. Biomed Res Int [Internet] 2017; 2017: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9391436. Available from: .

28.

O’doherty

O’keeffe

. Five year follow up of laser in situ keratomileusis for all levels of myopia. Br J Ophthalmol [Internet] 2006;90:20–23. [cited 2021 Mar 14] Available from: http://bjo.bmj.com/ last access 2021 Apr 23.

29.

Alió

Muftuoglu

Ortiz

, et al. Ten-Year follow-up of Laser In situ keratomileusis for myopia of up to −10 diopters. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 145: 46-54.

30.

Alió

Soria

Abbouda

, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for −6.00 to −18.00 diopters of myopia and up to −5.00 diopters of astigmatism: 15-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015; 41: 33–40.