Purpose: To evaluate the visual acuity, defocus curve and visual quality of life following bilateral implantation of a new hybrid extended depth of focus (EDOF)-multifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: Patients who underwent cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of Tecnis Synergy IOL were enrolled in this study. The main outcomes were defined as uncorrected distant, intermediate and near visual acuities (UDVA, UIVA and UNVA, respectively), defocus curve and VF-14 questionnaire aimed for visual performance. Results: The mean ± SD values for binocular UDVA, UIVA and UNVA were −0.01 ± 0.04, 0.05 ± 0.03 and 0.03 ± 0.05 logMAR, respectively. Defocus curve showed a continuous vision above 0.16 logMAR between +0.50 D and −2.50 D. Patients had good visual performance with mean VF-14 scores above 3 points. Driving at night (3.47 ± 0.64) was found to be the most difficult task to perform. Spectacle independence was 100% for both distant and near vision. Conclusion: Bilateral implantation of Tecnis Synergy IOL in cataract patients shows good visual acuity and performance, covering a good visual range without any need of spectacles.
BeardJROfficerAde CarvalhoIA, et al.The world report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet2016; 387: 2145–2154.
2.
BourneRRAFlaxmanSRBraithwaiteT, et al.Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health2017; 5: e888–e897.
3.
LuoBPBrownGCLuoSC, et al.The quality of life associated with presbyopia. Am J Ophthalmol2008; 145: 618–622.
4.
FrickKDJoySMWilsonDA, et al.The global burden of potential productivity loss from uncorrected presbyopia. Ophthalmology2015; 122: 1706–1710.
5.
BerdahlJBalaCDhariwalM, et al.Patient and economic burden of presbyopia: a systematic literature review. Clin Ophthalmol2020; 14: 3439–3450.
6.
AlioJLPlaza-PucheABFernandez-BuenagaR, et al.Multifocal intraocular lenses: an overview. Surv Ophthalmol2017; 62: 611–634.
AkmanAAsenaLOzturkC, et al.Evaluation of quality of life after implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg2019; 45: 130–134.
9.
AlioJLPlaza-PucheABDel Barrio JLA, et al.Clinical outcomes with a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens. Eur J Ophthalmol2018; 28: 419–424.
10.
CillinoGCasuccioAPastiM, et al.Working-age cataract patients: visual results, reading performance, and quality of life with three diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology2014; 121: 34–44.
11.
KohnenTBohmMHemkepplerE, et al.Visual performance of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens for treatment selection. Eye (Lond)2019; 33: 1556–1563.
12.
KohnenTHerzogMHemkepplerE, et al.Visual performance of a quadrifocal (trifocal) intraocular Lens following removal of the crystalline Lens. Am J Ophthalmol2017; 184: 52–62.
13.
KohnenTTitkeCBohmM. Trifocal intraocular Lens implantation to treat visual demands in Various distances following Lens removal. Am J Ophthalmol2016; 161: 71–7771.
14.
MencucciRFavuzzaECaporossiO, et al.Comparative analysis of visual outcomes, reading skills, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction with two models of trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses and an extended range of vision intraocular lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol2018; 256: 1913–1922.
15.
RosenEAlioJLDickHB, et al.Efficacy and safety of multifocal intraocular lenses following cataract and refractive lens exchange: metaanalysis of peer-reviewed publications. J Cataract Refract Surg2016; 42: 310–328.
16.
Ruiz-MesaRBlanch-RuizJRuiz-SantosM, et al.Optical and visual quality assessment of an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens based on spherical aberration of different sign. Int Ophthalmol2021; 41: 1019–1032.
17.
ViljanenAKoskelaKKoskelaH,et al.One-year results of health-related and vision-related quality of life after clear Lens extraction and multifocal IOL implantation. Am J Ophthalmol2021; 227: 240–244. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.023
18.
GilMAVaronCCardonaG, et al.Visual acuity and defocus curves with six multifocal intraocular lenses. Int Ophthalmol2020; 40: 393–401.
19.
OzulkenKKiziltoprakHYukselE, et al.A comparative evaluation of diffractive trifocal and New refractive/extended depth of focus intraocular lenses for refractive Lens exchange. Curr Eye Res2021; 46: 1–7. DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2020.1833347
20.
PaikDWParkJSYangCM, et al.Comparing the visual outcome, visual quality, and satisfaction among three types of multi-focal intraocular lenses. Sci Rep2020; 10: 14832.
21.
PedrottiECaronesFAielloF, et al.Comparative analysis of visual outcomes with 4 intraocular lenses: monofocal, multifocal, and extended range of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg2018; 44: 156–167.
Altemir-GomezIMillanMSVegaF, et al.Comparison of visual and optical quality of monofocal versus multifocal intraocular lenses. Eur J Ophthalmol2020; 30: 299–306.
24.
CardonaGVegaFGilMA, et al.Visual acuity and image quality in 5 diffractive intraocular lenses. Eur J Ophthalmol2018; 28: 36–41.
25.
TaribIDiakonisVFBreyerD, et al.Outcomes of combining a trifocal and a low-addition bifocal intraocular lens in patients seeking spectacle independence at all distances. J Cataract Refract Surg2019; 45: 620–629.
26.
YangCMLimDHHwangS, et al.Prospective study of bilateral mix-and-match implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses in Koreans. BMC Ophthalmol2018; 18: 73.
27.
TurhanSASevikMOTokerE. Comparison of reading performance with low add bifocal and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses implanted with mini-monovision. Int Ophthalmol2021; 41: 315–323.
28.
CochenerBConcerto StudyG. Clinical outcomes of a new extended range of vision intraocular lens: international multicenter concerto study. J Cataract Refract Surg2016; 42: 1268–1275.
29.
DellSJ. Evaluation of visual and subjective outcomes with Mix-and-match of three One-piece tecnis multifocal IOLs of varying Add powers. Clin Ophthalmol2020; 14: 2903–2911.
30.
MesciCErbilHHOlgunA, et al.Visual performances with monofocal, accommodating, and multifocal intraocular lenses in patients with unilateral cataract. Am J Ophthalmol2010; 150: 609–618.
31.
RibeiroFJFerreiraTBSilvaD, et al.Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantation of a presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens that combines EDOF and multifocal profiles. J Cataract Refract Surg2021; 47: 1448–1453. DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000659
32.
GabricNGabricIGabricK, et al.Clinical outcomes With a New continuous range of vision presbyopia-correcting intraocular Lens. J Refract Surg2021; 37: 256–262.
33.
DonmezOAsenaBSKaskalogluM, et al.Patients satisfaction and clinical outcomes of binocular implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens. Int Ophthalmol2020; 40: 1069–1075.
34.
SandovalHPPotvinRSolomonKD. Visual acuity, defocus curve, reading speed and patient satisfaction with a combined extended depth of focus intraocular Lens and multifocal intraocular Lens modality. Clin Ophthalmol2020; 14: 2667–2677.
