Abstract
Background:
To assess long-term structural and functional outcomes of intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea®) treatment for neovascular macular degeneration (nAMD) in a real-word setting.
Design and methods:
This was a retrospective, single-centre, non-randomized interventional cohort analysis. Data from treatment-naive patients with nAMD funded for treatment with intravitreal aflibercept in the period between 1 September 2013 and 28 February 2014 and who finished 4-year follow-up entered the analysis. Epidemiological data, visual acuity (VA) measured on ETDRS charts and injection numbers were recorded. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) data including presence or absence of macular fluid and automated central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) at year 1, 2, 3 and 4 were also recorded.
Results:
Ninety-four eyes of 89 patients finished 4-year follow-up. The mean number of aflibercept injections received over 4 years was 19.3. At baseline, the mean VA (SD) (Snellen) was 54.1 ± 15.5 (20/100) ETDRS letters whilst the mean CSM (SD) was 296 ± 81 µm. At 4 years, the mean VA (SD) (Snellen) was 60.4 ± 20.0 (20/63) ETDRS letters (p < 0.0001). Mean CSMT (SD) was 218 ± 79 μm (p < 0.0001). Thirty-three percent of eyes gained ⩾15 ETDRS letters at end of 4 years, and 66 (70%) eyes had no macular fluid at the end of the follow-up.
Conclusion and relevance:
The results suggest that good long-term morphological and functional treatment outcomes can be achieved using intravitreal aflibercept for nAMD in a real-life clinical setting.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
