To review the published scientific literature concerning clinical and material degradations of intraocular lenses after implantation in cataract surgery.
Methods:
A search was undertaken using the following databases: CENTRAL (including Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; The Cochrane Library: Issue 2 of 12 February 2019), Ovid MEDLINE (R) without Revisions (1996 to February week 2, 2019), Ovid MEDLINE (R) (1946 to February week 2, 2019), Ovid MEDLINE (R) Daily Update 19 February 2019, MEDLINE and MEDLINE non-indexed items, Embase (1980–2019, week 7), Embase (1974–2019, 19 February), Ovid MEDLINE (R) and Epub Ahead of Print, in-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily (1946 to 19 February 2019), Web of Science (all years), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrial.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). Only published articles in English were selected. Search terms/keywords included ‘IOL’ or ‘intraocular lens’, combined with ‘opacification’, degradation, glistenings, nanoglistenings, whitening, transmittance, light scatter, discolouration/discoloration, performance, quality, material, biocompatibility, calcification, explantation and ultraviolet/UV radiation. Relevant in-article references not returned in our searches were also considered.
Results:
After review of the available articles, the authors included 122 publications in this review, based on the quality of their methodology and their originality. The studies included in this review were randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-controlled studies, case series, case reports, laboratory studies and review papers. Differing material degradations of intraocular lenses have been described and their associated pathophysiology studied. Reported anomalies include photochemical alterations, water vacuoles, internal and surface calcific deposits, surface coatings and discolouration. The nature of such changes has been shown to depend on the type of intraocular lenses material used and/or manufacturing processes and storage conditions employed. Changes in the intraocular lens can also be influenced by surgical technique, coexisting ocular pathologies and topical and systemic medications. The clinical significance of these degradations is variable, with some resulting in significant visual disturbance and the need for intraocular lens explantation and others producing only minimal visual impairments. Failure to recognize the precise nature of the problem may lead to unnecessary laser capsulotomy procedures.
Conclusion:
Clinical degradations of intraocular lenses are uncommon but have been reported following the implantation of intraocular lenses made of differing biomaterials. Their correct identification and thorough investigation to determine the underlying cause is necessary for optimal patient management and the prevention of such problems. Choosing a lens made of a particular material may be important in patients with certain ocular conditions.
KuopamnS. The global intraocular lens market is forecast to reach $3.1 billion. ASD Reports, www.asdreports.com (accessed 14 September 2015).
2.
DayACDonachiePHSparrowJM, et al. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 1, visual outcomes and complications. Eye2015; 29(4): 552–560.
3.
PagerCK.Expectations and outcomes in cataract surgery: a prospective test of 2 models of satisfaction. Arch Ophthalmol2004; 122(12): 1788–1792.
4.
WilliamsH.Sir Harold Ridley’s vision. Br J Ophthalmol2001; 85(9): 1022–1023.
5.
AppleDJPengQArthurSN, et al. Snowflake degeneration of polymethyl methacrylate posterior chamber intraocular. Ophthalmology2002; 109(9): 1666–1675.
6.
WernerL.Causes of intraocular lens opacification or discoloration. J Cataract Refract Surg2007; 33: 713–726.
7.
DahleNWernerLFryL, et al. Localized, central optic snowflake degeneration of a polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lens: clinical report with pathological correlation. Arch Ophthalmol2006; 124(9): 1350–1353.
8.
PatelHChaleffAPatelN, et al. Snowflake degeneration of a poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lens. JCRS Online Case Rep2017; 5(1): 9–11.
9.
GarrottHO’DayJ.Snowflake degeneration of an intraocular lens. Clin Exp Ophthalmol2004; 32(5): 534–535.
10.
TanLTShuttleworthGN.Asymptomatic snowflake degeneration in a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) intraocular lens implant. Ann Ophthalmol2008; 40(3–4): 173–174.
11.
MaiaOOJrNakashimaAFBarbosaEP, et al. Late opacification of a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) intraocular lens: case report. Arq Bras Oftalmol2005; 68(5): 683–685.
12.
KatoKNishidaMYamaneH, et al. Glistening formation in an AcrySof lens initiated by spinodal decomposition of the polymer network by temperature change. J Cataract Refract Surg2001; 27(9): 1493–1498.
13.
ChristiansenGDurcanFJOlsonRJ, et al. Glistenings in the AcrySof intraocular lens: pilot study. J Cataract Refract Surg2001; 27(5): 728–733.
14.
HenriksenBSKinardKOlsonRJ.Effect of intraocular lens glistening size on visual quality. J Cataract Refract Surg2015; 41(6): 1190–1198.
15.
BallinN.Glistenings in injection-moulded lens (Letter). J Am Intraocul Implant Soc1984; 10: 473.
16.
TognettoDTotoLSanguinettiG, et al. Glistenings in foldable intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2002; 28(7): 1211–1216.
17.
RønbeckMBehndigATaubeM, et al. Comparison of glistenings in intraocular lenses with three different materials: 12-year follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol2013; 91(1): 66–70.
18.
HayashiKHirataAYoshidaM, et al. Long-term effect of surface light scattering and glistenings of intraocular lenses on visual function. Am J Ophthalmol2012; 154(2): 240–251.e2.
19.
GregoriNZSpencerTSMamalisN, et al. In vitro comparison of glistening formation among hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2002; 28(7): 1262–1268.
20.
WilkinsEOlsonRJ.Glistenings with long-term follow-up of the surgidev B20/20 polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol2001; 132(5): 783–785.
21.
Cisneros-LanuzaAHurtado-SarrióMDuch-SamperA, et al. Glistenings in the Artiflex phakic intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg2007; 33(8): 1405–1408.
22.
ChangAKugelbergM.Glistenings 9 years after phacoemulsification in hydrophobic and hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2015; 41(6): 1199–1204.
23.
DavisonJA.Clinical performance of Alcon SA30AL and SA60AT single-piece acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2002; 28(7): 1112–1123.
24.
WaiteAFaulknerNOlsonRJ.Glistenings in the single-piece, hydrophobic, acrylic intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol2007; 144(1): 143–144.
25.
LeydoltCSchrieflSStifterE, et al. Posterior capsule opacification with the iMics1 NY-60 and AcrySof SN60WF 1-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses: 3-year results of a randomized trial. Am J Ophthalmol2013; 156(2): 375–381.
26.
KahramanGFerdinaroCWetzelB, et al. Intraindividual comparison of capsule behavior of 2 hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses during a 5-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg2017; 43(2): 228–233.
27.
DhaliwalDKMamalisNOlsonRJ, et al. Visual significance of glistenings seen in the AcrySof intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg1996; 22(4): 452–457.
28.
ColinJOrignacITouboulD.Glistenings in a large series of hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2009; 35(12): 2121–2126.
29.
JohanssonB.Glistenings, anterior/posterior capsular opacification and incidence of Nd:YAG laser treatments with two aspheric hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses – a long-term intra-individual study. Acta Ophthalmol2017; 95(7): 671–677.
30.
Moreno-MontañésJAlvarezARodriguez-CondeR, et al. Clinical factors related to the frequency and intensity of glistenings in AcrySof intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2003; 29(10): 1980–1984.
31.
BehndigAMönestamE.Quantification of glistenings in intraocular lenses using Scheimpflug photography. J Cataract Refract Surg2009; 35(1): 14–17.
32.
WernerL.Glistenings and surface light scattering in intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2010; 36: 1398–1420.
33.
SaylorDMColeman RichardsonDDairBJ, et al. Osmotic cavitation of elastomeric intraocular lenses. Acta Biomater2010; 6(3): 1090–1098.
34.
TetzMJorgensenMR.New hydrophobic IOL materials and understanding the science of glistenings, current eye research2015; 40(10): 969–981.
35.
BlumeISchweringPJFMulderMHV, et al. Vapour sorption and permeation properties of poly (dimethylsiloxane) films. J Memb Sci1991; 61: 85–97.
36.
MiyataAYaguchiS.Equilibrium water content and glistenings in acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2004; 30(8): 1768–1772.
37.
MiyataKOgataMHonboM, et al. Suppression of surface light scattering in intraocular lenses manufactured with improved production process. J Cataract Refract Surg2016; 42(12): 1716–1720.
38.
ThomesBECallaghanTA.Evaluation of in vitro glistening formation in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol2013; 7: 1529–1534.
39.
DickHBOlsonRJAugustinAJ, et al. Vacuoles in the AcrySofTM intraocular lens as factor of the presence of serum in aqueous humor. Ophthalmic Res2001; 33(2): 61–67.
40.
ManuchehriKMohamedSCheungD, et al. Brown deposits in the optic of foldable intraocular lenses in patients with uveitis. Eye2004; 18(1): 54–58.
41.
ArshinoffS.Does a tight capsular bag cause glistenings. J Cataract Refract Surg1998; 24(1): 6.
42.
MönestamEBehndigA.Impact on visual function from light scattering and glistenings in intraocular lenses, a long-term study. Acta Ophthalmol2011; 89(8): 724–728.
43.
ColinJPraudDTouboulD, et al. Incidence of glistenings with the latest generation of yellow-tinted hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2012; 38(7): 1140–1146.
44.
ChangABehndigARønbeckM, et al. Comparison of posterior capsule opacification and glistenings with 2 hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses: 5- to 7-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg2013; 39(5): 694–698.
45.
StanojcicNO’BrartDPSMaycockN, et al. Effects of intraocular lens glistenings on visual function: a prospective study and presentation of a new glistenings grading methodology. BMJ Open Ophthalmol2019; 4(1): e000266.
46.
XiLLiuYZhaoF, et al. Analysis of glistenings in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses on visual performance. Int J Ophthalmol2014; 7(3): 446–451.
47.
GunencUOnerFHTongalS, et al. Effects on visual function of glistenings and folding marks in AcrySof intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2001; 27(10): 1611–1614.
48.
SchweitzerCOrignacIPraudD, et al. Glistening in glaucomatous eyes: visual performances and risk factors. Acta Ophthalmol2014; 92(6): 529–534.
49.
BiwerHSchuberEHonigM, et al. Objective classification of glistenings in implanted intraocular lenses using Scheimpflug tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg2015; 41(12): 2644–2651.
DogruMTetsumotoKTagamiY, et al. Optical and atomic force microscopy of an explanted AcrySof intraocular lens with glistenings. J Cataract Refract Surg2000; 26(4): 571–575.
53.
WernerLStorsbergJMaugerO, et al. Unusual pattern of glistening formation on a 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg2008; 34(9): 1604–1609.
54.
WernerLDornellesFHilgertCR, et al. Early opacification of silicone intraocular lenses: laboratory analyses of 6 explants. J Cataract Refract Surg2006; 32(3): 499–509.
55.
ElgoharyMZaheerAWernerL, et al. Opacification of Array SA40N silicone multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg2007; 33(2): 342–347.
56.
TanakaTSaikaSHashizumeN, et al. Brown haze in an Allergan SI-40NB silicone intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg2004; 30(1): 250–252.
KochDDHeitLE.Discoloration of silicone intraocular lenses. Arch Ophthalmol1992; 110(3): 319–320.
59.
WernerLMamalisNOlsonRJ. Postoperative optic opacification of silicone IOLs: analyses of 20 explants. In: Free papers, cataract session, American academy of ophthalmology annual meeting, New Orleans, LA, 11November2007.
60.
JonesDFIrwinAEI. Discoloration of intraocular lens subsequent to rifabutin use. Arch Ophthalmol2002; 120(9): 1211–1212.
61.
StevensSWernerLMamalisN.Corneal edema and permanent blue discoloration of a silicone intraocular lens by methylene blue. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging2007; 38(2): 136–141.
62.
KataiNYokoyamaRYoshimuraN.Progressive brown discoloration of silicone intraocular lenses after vitrectomy in a patient on amiodarone. J Cataract Refract Surg1999; 25(3): 451–452.
63.
SathyanPMyintKSinghG, et al. Late green discoloration of Allergan SI-40NB silicone intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg2006; 32(9): 1584–1585.
64.
VenkateshRKumarTTRavindranRD.Greenish discoloration of silicone intraocular lens. Indian J Ophthalmol2008; 24(3): 614–614.
65.
WernerLAppleDJCremaAS, et al. Permanent blue discoloration of a hydrogel intraocular lens by intraoperative trypan blue. J Cataract Refract Surg2002; 28(7): 1279–1286.
66.
GhoshYKGoodallKL.Total opacification of intraocular lens implant after uncomplicated cataract surgery: a case series. Arch Ophthalmol2004; 122(5): 782–784.
67.
WongMHYSuDHWCheeSP.Brown discoloration of acrylic hydrophobic intraocular lens. Can J Ophthalmol2016; 51(4): 277–281.
68.
MilauskasAT.Brown discoloration of acrylic multifocal, monofocal, and blue light-filtering IOLs. J Cataract Refract Surg2012; 38(1): 176–177.
69.
NeuhannIMKleinmannGAppleDJ.A new classification of calcification of intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology2008; 115(1): 73–79.
70.
BarraDWernerLCostaJL, et al. Light scattering and light transmittance in a series of calcified single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses of the same design. J Cataract Refract Surg2014; 40(1): 121–128.
71.
WackernagelWEttingerKWeitgasserU, et al. Opacification of a silicone intraocular lens caused by calcium deposits on the optic. J Cataract Refract Surg2004; 30(2): 517–520.
72.
FootLWernerLGillsJP, et al. Surface calcification of silicone plate intraocular lenses in patients with asteroid hyalosis. Am J Ophthalmol2004; 137(6): 979–987.
73.
WernerLKollaritsCRMamalisN, et al. Surface calcification of a 3-piece silicone intraocular lens in a patient with asteroid hyalosis: a clinicopathologic case report. Ophthalmology2005; 112(3): 447–452.
74.
StringhamJWernerLMonsonB, et al. Calcification of different designs of silicone intraocular lenses in eyes with asteroid hyalosis. Ophthalmology2010; 117(8): 1486–1492.
75.
EspandarLMukherjeeNWernerL, et al. Diagnosis and management of opacified silicone intraocular lenses in patients with asteroid hyalosis. J Cataract Refract Surg2015; 41(1): 222–225.
76.
AppleDJWernerLEscobar-GomezM, et al. Deposits on the optical surfaces of Hydroview intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2000; 26(6): 796–797.
77.
WernerLAppleDJEscobar-GomezM, et al. Postoperative deposition of calcium on the surfaces of a hydrogel intraocular lens. Ophthalmology2000; 107(12): 2179–2185.
78.
NeuhannIMWernerLIzakAM, et al. Late postoperative opacification of a hydrophilic acrylic (hydrogel) intraocular lens: a clinicopathological analysis of 106 explants. Ophthalmology2004; 111(11): 2094–2101.
79.
WernerLAppleDJKaskalogluM, et al. Dense opacification of the optical component of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens: a clinicopathological analysis of 9 explanted lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2001; 27(9): 1485–1492.
80.
DoreyMWBrownsteinSHillVE, et al. Proposed pathogenesis for the delayed postoperative opacification of the hydroview hydrogel intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol2003; 135(5): 591–598.
81.
HaymoreJZaidmanGWernerL, et al. Misdiagnosis of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens optic opacification: report of 8 cases with the MemoryLens. Ophthalmology2007; 114(9): 1689–1695.
82.
WernerLHunterBStevensS, et al. Role of silicon contamination on calcification of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol2006; 141(1): 35–43.
83.
GuanXTangRNancollasGH.The potential calcification of octacalcium phosphate on intraocular lens surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A2004; 71(3): 488–496.
84.
WuWGuanXTangR, et al. Calcification of intraocular implant lens surfaces. Langmuir2004; 20(4): 1356–1361.
85.
HunterBWernerLMemmenJE, et al. Postoperative localized opacification of the new MemoryLens design: analyses of an explant. J Cataract Refract Surg2005; 31(9): 1836–1840.
86.
GartaganisSPKanellopoulouDGMelaEK, et al. Opacification of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens attributable to calcification: investigation on mechanism. Am J Ophthalmol2008; 146(3): 395–403.
87.
WernerLWilbanksGNieuwendaalCP, et al. Localized opacification of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses after procedures using intracameral injection of air or gas. J Cataract Refract Surg2015; 41(1): 199–207.
88.
GiersBCTandoganTAuffarthGU, et al. Hydrophilic intraocular lens opacification after posterior lamellar keratoplasty – a material analysis with special reference to optical quality assessment. BMC Ophthalmol2017; 17(1): 150.
89.
MarcovichALTandoganTBareketM, et al. Opacification of hydrophilic intraocular lenses associated with vitrectomy and injection of intraocular gas. BMJ Open Ophthalmol2018; 3(1): e000157.
FungSSSykakisEIslamNM, et al. Intraocular lens opacification following intracameral injection of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator to treat inflammatory membranes after cataract surgery. J Ophthalmol2015; 2015: 975075.
92.
TandoganTKhoramniaRChoiCY, et al. Optical and material analysis of opacified hydrophilic intraocular lenses after explantation: a laboratory study. BMC Ophthalmol2015; 15: 170.
93.
ZuberbuhlerBCarifiG.Pigment deposits on hydrophilic intraocular lenses after phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Saudi J Ophthalmol2012; 26(1): 109–111.
94.
GartaganisSPPrahsPLazariED, et al. Calcification of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses with a hydrophobic surface: laboratory analysis of 6 cases. Am J Ophthalmol2016; 168: 68–77.
95.
GurabardhiMHäberleHAurichH, et al. Serial intraocular lens opacifications of different designs from the same manufacturer: clinical and light microscopic results of 71 explant cases. J Cataract Refract Surg2018; 44(11): 1326–1332.
96.
NishiharaHYaguchiSOnishiT, et al. Surface scattering in implanted hydrophobic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2003; 29(7): 1385–1388.
97.
MatsushimaHMukaiKNagataM, et al. Analysis of surface whitening of extracted hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2009; 35(11): 1927–1934.
98.
NagataMMatsushimaHMukaiK, et al. Clinical evaluation of the transparency of hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens optics. J Cataract Refract Surg2010; 36(12): 2056–2060.
99.
OngMDCallaghanTAPeiR, et al. Etiology of surface light scattering on hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2012; 38(10): 1833–1844.
100.
MiyataKOtaniSNejimaR, et al. Comparison of postoperative surface light scattering of different intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol2009; 93(5): 684–687.
101.
MiyataKHonboMOtaniS, et al. Effect on visual acuity of increased surface light scattering in intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2012; 38(2): 221–226.
102.
TakahashiYKawamoritaTMitaN, et al. Optical simulation for subsurface nanoglistening. J Cataract Refract Surg2015; 41(1): 193–198.
103.
SokolSMoskowitzASkarfB, et al. Contrast sensitivity in diabetics with and without Background retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol1985; 103(1): 51–54.
104.
WernerLStoverJCSchwiegerlingJ, et al. Light scattering, straylight, and optical quality in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses with subsurface nanoglistenings. J Cataract Refract Surg2016; 42(1): 148–156.
105.
BeheregaraySYamamotoTHiraokaT, et al. Influence on visual function of forward light scattering associated with subsurface nanoglistenings in intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2014; 40(7): 1147–1154.
106.
RulloJLloydJC.Clinically significant deterioration in the quality of vision as a result of subsurface nanoglistenings in a hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg2014; 40(2): 336–337.
107.
AppleDJFedermanJLKrolickiTJ, et al. Irreversible silicone oil adhesion to silicone intraocular lenses. A clinicopathologic analysis. Ophthalmology1996; 103(10): 1555–1561.
108.
AppleDJIsaacsRTKentDG, et al. Silicone oil adhesion to intraocular lenses: an experimental study comparing various biomaterials. J Cataract Refract Surg1997; 23(4): 536–544.
109.
YamanASaatciAOSarioğluS, et al. Interaction with intraocular lens materials: does heavy silicone oil act like silicone oil. J Cataract Refract Surg2007; 33(1): 127–129.
110.
OnerFHSaatciOASarioğluS, et al. Interaction of intraocular lenses with various concentrations of silicone oil: an experimental study. Ophthalmologica2003; 217(2): 124–128.
111.
WernerLSherJHTaylorJR, et al. Toxic anterior segment syndrome and possible association with ointment in the anterior chamber following cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg2006; 32(2): 227–235.
112.
ChewJJWernerLMackmanG, et al. Late opacification of a silicone intraocular lens caused by ophthalmic ointment. J Cataract Refract Surg2006; 32(2): 341–346.
113.
ChenKHLinSYLiMJ, et al. Retained antibiotic ophthalmic ointment on an intraocular lens 34 months after sutureless cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol2005; 139(4): 743–745.
114.
FraunfelderFTHannaC.Ophthalmic ointment. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol1973; 77(4): 467–475.
115.
GarzoziHJMuallemMSHarrisA.Recurrent anterior uveitis and glaucoma associated with inadvertent entry of ointment into the anterior chamber after radial keratotomy. J Cataract Refract Surg1999; 25(12): 1685–1687.
116.
AralikattiAKNeedhamADLeeMW, et al. Entry of antibiotic ointment into the anterior chamber after uneventful phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg2003; 29(3): 595–597.
117.
GaytonJLAppleDJPengQ, et al. Interlenticular opacification: clinicopathological correlation of a complication of posterior chamber piggyback intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2000; 26(3): 330–336.
118.
WernerLShugarJKAppleDJ, et al. Opacification of piggyback IOLs associated with an amorphous material attached to interlenticular surfaces. J Cataract Refract Surg2000; 26(11): 1612–1619.
119.
WernerLAppleDJPandeySK, et al. Analysis of elements of interlenticular opacification. Am J Ophthalmol2002; 133(3): 320–326.
120.
EleftheriadisHMarcantonioJDuncanG, et al. Interlenticular opacification in piggyback AcrySof intraocular lenses: explantation technique and laboratory investigations. Br J Ophthalmol2001; 85(7): 830–836.
121.
WernerLMamalisNStevensS, et al. Interlenticular opacification: dual-optic versus piggyback intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg2006; 32(4): 655–661.
122.
JacksonDWKochDD.Interlenticular opacification associated with asymmetric haptic fixation of the anterior intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol2003; 135(1): 106–108.
