The Veterans Affairs Low-Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire-48 (VA LV VFQ-48): Performance of the Italian version

Abstract

Purpose:

The Veterans Affairs Low-Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire-48 is among the most validated tools to collect patient-reported outcomes in a low-vision population. We have aimed to conduct a pilot validation of the Italian version of the Veterans Affairs Low-Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire-48.

Methods:

The Veterans Affairs Low-Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire-48 was translated using a standardized procedure and then administered to consecutive low-vision patients attending rehabilitation services in three centers. Patients were interviewed by a trained psychologist regarding the individual items of the tool.

Results:

We included 131 patients with a mean visual acuity of 0.91 logMAR (standard deviation: 0.42 logMAR), mostly affected by age-related macular degeneration. The Veterans Affairs Low-Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire-48 showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.98) and good item-test and item-rest correlation (median: 0.73 and 0.71, respectively). Both the overall score and the subscale (reading, visual motor, mobility and visual information) scores significantly correlated with visual acuity, reading acuity and speed. Reading speed achieved the best absolute correlation with the Veterans Affairs Low-Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire-48 scores (Spearman r: 0.39–0.49).

Conclusion:

The Italian version of the Veterans Affairs Low-Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire-48 is a valid tool to assess patients attending low-vision services. Revising a few items may further improve the tool.

Keywords

Low-vision rehabilitation quality of life activities of daily living questionnaires

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ehrlich

Spaeth

Carlozzi

, et al. Patient-centered outcome measures to assess functioning in randomized controlled trials of low-vision rehabilitation: a review. Patient 2017; 10(1): 39–49.

Massof

. A systems model for low vision rehabilitation: II. Measurement of vision disabilities. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75(5): 349–373.

Becker

Lambert

Schulz

, et al. An instrument to measure the activity level of the blind. Int J Rehabil Res 1985; 8(4): 415–424.

Weih

Hassell

Keeffe

. Assessment of the impact of vision impairment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 927–935.

Wolffsohn

Cochrane

. Design of the low vision quality-of life questionnaire (LVQOL) and measuring the outcome of low vision rehabilitation. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 130(6): 793–802.

Stelmack

Szlyk

Stelmack

, et al. Psychometric properties of the veterans affairs low-vision visual functioning questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45(11): 3919–3928.

Khadka

McAlinden

Pesudovs

. Quality assessment of ophthalmic questionnaires: review and recommendations. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90(8): 720–744.

Szlyk

Stelmack

Massof

, et al. Performance of the veterans affairs low vision visual functioning questionnaire. J Vis Impair Blind 2004; 98: 261–275.

Stelmack

Rosenbloom

Brenneman

, et al. Patient’s perception of need for low vision devices. J Vis Impair Blind 2003; 97: 521–535.

10.

Stelmack

Szlyk

Stelmack

, et al. Measuring outcomes of vision rehabilitation with the veterans affairs low vision visual functioning questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47(8): 3253–3261.

11.

Stelmack

Tang

Reda

, et al. Outcomes of the veterans affairs low vision intervention trial (LOVIT). Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126: 608–617.

12.

Stelmack

Tang

Reda

, et al. VA LOVIT II: a protocol to compare low vision rehabilitation and basic low vision. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012; 32(6): 461–471.

13.

Van de Vijver

Tanzer

. Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: an overview. Eur Rev Appl Psychol 2004; 54: 119–135.

14.

Beck

Steer

Carbin

. Psychometric properties of the beck depression inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 1988; 8: 77–100.

15.

Diener

Emmons

Larsen

, et al. The satisfaction with life scale. J Personal Assess 1985; 49: 71–75.

16.

Snyder

Harris

Anderson

, et al. The will and the ways: development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. J Pers Soc Psychol 1991; 60(4): 570–585.

17.

Scheier

Carver

Bridges

. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the life orientation test. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994; 67(6): 1063–1078.

18.

Norton

Weiss

. The role of courage on behavioral approach in a fear-eliciting situation: a proof-of-concept pilot study. J Anxiety Disord 2009; 23(2): 212–217.

19.

Wang

Weiss

. Robustness of parameter estimation to assumptions of normality in the multidimensional graded response model. Multivariate Behav Res 2018; 53(3): 403–418.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB