Diurnal Variation of Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure in Normal Subjects

Abstract

Purpose

To assess and investigate the relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure (IOP) and biomechanical properties of cornea.

Methods

Sixty-two healthy volunteers were recruited. Corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc), Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg), corneal resistance factor (CRF), and corneal hysteresis (CH) parameters were recorded by the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured using an ultrasonic pachymeter. Three consecutive measurements of IOPcc, IOPg, CRF, CH, and CCT were recorded at 8:00 AM, 11:00 AM, 2:00 PM, and 5:00 PM. One-way analysis of variance and Pearson correlation tests were used for statistical analysis. Intra device repeatability was evaluated using Scheffe multiple comparison.

Results

IOPcc, IOPg, CRF, CH, and CCT measurements displayed a stable profile during daytime acquisitions and no statistically significant variation was noted (p>0.05). All measurements of IOPcc, IOPg, CRF, and CH recorded by ORA at 8:00 AM, 11:00 AM, 2:00 PM, and 5:00 PM were all found to be highly repeatable (p>0.05). There was a statistically significant and inverse correlation between IOPcc and CH (p=0.001), and a positive correlation was detected between IOPcc and CRF (p=0.001). CRF and CH were both found to be positively correlated to CCT (p=0.001).

Conclusions

IOPcc readings and recordings of corneal biomechanics were constant throughout the day in healthy eyes. CRF and CH seem to exert different effects on IOPcc as diverse correlations were detected between CRF, CH, and IOPcc. Assessment of IOP and corneal biomechanics using ORA was found to be a highly repeatable. (Eur J Ophthalmol 2009; 19: 798–803)

Keywords

Corneal biomechanics Corneal hysteresis Diurnal variation Intraocular pressure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Liu

J.H.

, Kripke

D.F.

, Twa

M.D.

Twenty-four-hour pattern of intraocular pressure in young adults with moderate to severe myopia.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 2351–5.

Pointer

J.S.

. Human intraocular pressure and its diurnal variation in healthy subjects. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1999; 19(Suppl 2): S43–8.

Syam

P.P.

, Mavrikakis

, Liu

. Importance of early morning intraocular pressure recording for measurement of diurnal variation of intraocular pressure. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 926–7.

Wilensky

J.T.

. Diurnal variations in intraocular pressure. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1991; 89: 757–90.

Luce

D.A.

. Determining in-vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 156–62.

Laiquzzaman

, Bhojwani

, Cunliffe

. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006; 34: 114–8.

Martinez-de la-Casa

J.M.

, Garcia-Feijoo

, Fernandez-Vidal

. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 4410–4.

Brown

K.E.

, Congdon

N.G.

. Corneal structure and biomechanics: Impact on the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006; 17: 338–43.

Pepose

J.S.

, Feigenbaum

S.K.

, Qazi

M.A.

, Sanderson

. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143: 39–47.

10.

Kirwan

, O'Keefe

. Corneal hysteresis using the Reichert ocular response analyzer: findings pre- and post-LASIK and LASEK. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 2008; 86: 215–8.

11.

Shah

, Laiquzzaman

, Bhojwani

, Mantry

, Cunliffe

. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 3026–31.

12.

Kida

, Liu

J.H.K.

, Weinreb

R.N.

. Effect of 24-hour corneal biomechanical changes on intraocular pressure measurement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 4422–6.

13.

Gonzalez-Meijome

J.M.

, Queiros

, Jorge

, Diaz-Rey

, Parafta

M.A.

. Intraoffice variability of corneal biomechanical parameters and intraocular pressure (IOP). Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 457–62.

14.

Brubaker

R.F.

. Tonometry and corneal thickness. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117: 104–5.

15.

Kiely

P.M.

, Carney

L.G.

, Smith

. Diurnal variations of corneal topography and thickness. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1982; 59: 976–82.

16.

Harper

C.L.

, Boulton

M.E.

, Bennett

Diurnal variations in human corneal thickness.

Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80: 1068–72.

17.

Shah

, Spedding

, Bhojwani

, Kwartz

, Henson

, McLeod

. Assessment of the diurnal variation in central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for patients with suspected glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 1191–3.

18.

Giasson

, Forthomme

. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements between optical and ultrasound pachometers. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 236–41.

19.

Wilensky

J.T.

, Gieser

D.K.

, Dietsche

M.L.

, Mori

M.T.

, Zeimer

. Individual variability in the diurnal pressure curve. Ophthalmology 1993; 100: 940–4.

20.

David

, Zangwill

, Briscoe

, Dagan

, Yagev

, Yassur

. Diurnal intraocular pressure variations: an analysis of 690 diurnal curves. Br J Ophthalmol 1992; 76: 280–3.

21.

Phelps

C.D.

, Woolson

R.F.

, Kolker

A.E.

, Becker

. Diurnal variation in intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 1974; 77: 367–77.

22.

Liu

J.H.

, Kripke

D.F.

, Hofman

R.E.

Nocturnal elevation of intraocular pressure in young adults.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39: 2707–12.

23.

Frampton

, Da Rim

, Brown

. Diurnal variation of intraocular pressure and the overriding effects of sleep. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64: 54–61.

24.

Drance

S.M.

. The significance of the diurnal tension variation in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1960; 64: 494–501.

25.

Liu

J.H.

, Kripke

D.F.

, Hofmann

R.E.

Elevation of human intraocular pressure at night under moderate illumination.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 2439–42.

26.

Kitazawa

, Horie

. Diurnal variation of intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1975; 79: 557–66.

27.

Shah

, Laiquzzaman

, Cunlife

, Mantry

. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyzer to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006; 29: 257–62.

28.

Broman

A.T.

, Congdon

N.G.

, Bandeen-Roche

, Quigley

H.A.

. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma 2007; 16: 581–8.

29.

Edmund

. Assessment of an elastic model in the pathogenesis of keratoconus. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1987; 65: 545–50.

30.

Silver

D.M.

, Geyer

. Pressure-volume relation for the living human eye. Curr Eye Res 2000; 20: 115–20.

31.

Friberg

T.R.

, Fourman

S.B.

. Scleral buckling and ocular rigidity: clinical ramifications. Arch Ophthalmol 1990; 108: 1622–7.

32.

Pallikaris

I.G.

, Kyminois

G.D.

, Ginis

H.S.

, Kounis

G.A.

, Tsilimbaris

M.K.

. Ocular rigidity in living human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 409–41.

33.

Shah

, Laiquzzaman

, Mantry

, Cunliffe

. Ocular response analyzer to assess hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in low tension, open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008; 36: 508–13.