Visual Recognition Time in Strabismus: Small-Angle versus Large-Angle Deviation

Abstract

Purpose

To measure the possible differences in monocular detection time of a threshold visual acuity stimulus (recognition time [RT]) between patients with small-angle and large-angle strabismus.

METHODS

Ten patients with free alternating esotropia were tested (10 to 18 years old): five with small-angle esotropia (≤7°), five with large-angle esotropia (15° to 20°). Six age-matched normal subjects served as controls. The RT of the threshold stimulus was measured in both eyes sequentially for stimuli presented in the center of a computer monitor (RT 1). Moreover, we measured the time necessary for identifying the same threshold visual acuity stimulus generated on the computer screen in the moment in which fixation is taken up by one eye after occlusion of the second eye (RT 2). Using the same setting, RT was also measured monocularly in all strabismic and normal subjects who were originally looking at a luminous fixation point positioned horizontally at 6.5 and 15 degrees from the center of the monitor (RT 3).

Results

The multivariate analysis of variance for repeated measures indicated that there was no statistical difference in RT 1 between groups. The mean RT2 was significantly longer (p<0.001) in large-angle strabismic eyes when compared with that of normal control eyes. The mean RT 2 in small-angle strabismic eyes did not differ significantly from that of normal eyes. Finally, RT 3 (both at 6.5° and 15° of eccentricity) did not show any significant difference in the three different study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors hypothesized that alternating strabismus patients may have a significant advantage in maintaining a small-angle deviation, as a large-angle deviation would require longer RT in the moment the deviated eye takes up fixation. It can be speculated that the extension of re-fixation movement, obviously shorter in small-angle strabismus patients, is the main factor responsible for longer RT occurring in large-angle strabismus patients.

Keywords

Extraocular muscle surgery Proprioception Saccade Strabismus Visual discrimination

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

von Noorden

G.K.

, Campos

E.C.

. Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility. Theory and Management of Strabismus. 6th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 2002: 222–39.

Campos

E.C.

. Amblyopia. Surv Ophthalmol 1995; 40: 23–39.

Lennerstrand

, Tian

, Han

. Effects of eye muscle proprioceptive activation on eye position in normal and exotropic subjects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1997; 235: 63–9.

van Leeuwen

A.F.

, Collewijn

, de Faber

J-TNH

, van der Steen

. Saccadic binocular coordination in alternating exotropia. Vision Res 2001; 41: 3425–35.

Steinbach

M.J.

. Alternating exotropia: temporal course of the switch in suppression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 20: 129–33.

Ciuffreda

K.J.

, Kenyon

R.V.

, Stark

. Increased saccadic latencies in amblyopic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978; 17: 697–702.

Ciuffreda

K.J.

, Kenyon

R.V.

, Stark

Abnormal saccadic substitution during small-amplitude pursuit tracking in amblyopic eyes.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1979; 18: 506–16.

Kapoula

, Bucci

M.P.

, Eggert

, Garraud

. Impairment of the binocular coordination of saccades in strabismus. Vision Res 1997; 37: 2757–66.

Bagolini

. Part I. Sensorial anomalies in strabismus: suppression, anomalous correspondence, amblyopia. Doc Ophthalmol 1976; 41: 1–22.

10.

Bagolini

. Part II. Sensorio-motorial anomalies in strabismus: anomalous movements. Doc Ophthalmol 1976; 41: 23–41.

11.

Bucci

M.P.

, Kapoula

, Yang

, Roussat

, Bremond-Gignac

. Binocular coordination of saccades in children with strabismus before and after surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 1040–7.

12.

Campos

E.C.

, Zanasi

M.R.

. Die anomalen Fusionsbewegungen: der senso-motorische Aspekt des anomalen Binokularsehens. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1978; 205: 101–11.