Classical assimilation theory states that migrants’ identification with a receiving country strengthens over generations, whilst identification with the home country weakens. A Flemish survey of first (G1), second (G2), 2.5 (G2.5) and third (G3) generation immigrant youths (n = 1,587) reveals that the findings for adolescents with a background in the oldest 15 member states of the European Union (EU15) seem to align with classical assimilation theory. In the non-EU15 group, those of G2 and G2.5 show the strongest identification with both countries. The Belgian context also prompted an investigation of the identification with Flanders, which proved to be even more exclusionary than Belgian national identification. Last, the young people’s identification with their city of residence was not as strong as expected from the literature, probably because it was the neighbourhood, rather than the city as a whole, that mattered to them. At the least, nuancing the classical assimilation theory is thus necessary.
Agentschap voor Binnenlands Bestuur en Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap [Agency for Home Affairs and Government of Flanders Research Centre]. (2013). Lokale Inburgerings- en Integratiemonitor 2013. Sint-Niklaas [Local citizenisation and integration monitor 2013. Sint-Niklaas]. Brussels: Author.
2.
AlbaR. (1990). Ethnic identity: The transformation of white America. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.
3.
AlbaR.FonerN. (2015). Strangers no more. Immigration and the challenges of integration in North America and Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
AndreS.DronkersJ. (2017). Perceived in-group discrimination by first and second generation immigrants from different countries of origin in 27 EU member-states. International Sociology, 32(1), 105–129. doi:10.1177/0268580916676915.
5.
AntonsichM. (2012). Exploring the demands of assimilation among white ethnic majorities in Western Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(1), 59–76. doi:10.1080/1369183x.2012.640015.
6.
BentonG.GomezE. T. (2014). Belonging to the nation: generational change, identity and the Chinese diaspora. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(7), 1157–1171. doi:10.1080/01419870.2014.890236.
7.
BerryJ. W. (2008). Globalisation and acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(4), 328–336.
8.
BillietJ.MaddensB.FrognierA-P. (2006). Does Belgium (still) exist? Differences in political culture between Flemings and Walloons. West European Politics, 29(5), 912–932.
9.
BoonenJ.HoogheM. (2014). Do nationalist parties shape or follow sub-national identities? A panel analysis on the rise of the nationalist party in the Flemish Region of Belgium, 2006–11. Nations and Nationalism, 20(1), 56–79. doi:10.1111/nana.12044.
10.
Bouverne-De BieM.Van de WalleT.BradtL. (2014). Bij wie kunnen jongeren terecht? Over informele steun en toegankelijkheid van sociale voorzieningen [Who can young people turn to? About informal support and access to social services]. In BradtL.PleysierS.PutJ.SiongersJ.SpruytB. (Eds.), Jongeren in cijfers en letters. Bevindingen uit de JOP-monitor 3 en de JOP-schoolmonitor 2013 [Young people in numbers and letters. Findings from the JOP monitor 3 and the JOP school monitor 2013] (pp. 91–110). Louvain: Acco.
11.
BrubakerR. (2001). The return of assimilation? Changing perspectives on immigration and its sequels in France, Germany and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4), 531–548. doi:10.1080/01419870120049770.
12.
BrubakerR. (2009). Ethnicity, race, and nationalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 21–42. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-l15916.
13.
Colic-PeiskerV.TilburyF. (2007). Integration into the Australian labour market: The experience of three “visibly different” groups of recently arrived refugees. International Migration, 45(1), 59–85. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2435.2007.00396.x.
14.
ColomboE.LeoniniL.RebughiniP. (2009). Different but not stranger: Everyday collective identifications among adolescent children of immigrants in Italy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(1), 37–59. doi:10.1080/13691830802489101.
15.
ConnollyP. (2011). Using survey data to explore preschool children’s ethnic awareness and attitudes. Journal of early childhood research, 9(2), 175–187.
16.
CostiganC. L.DokisD. P. (2006). Similarities and differences in acculturation among mothers, fathers, and children in immigrant Chinese families. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(6), 723–741. doi:10.1177/0022022106292080.
CrulM.SchneiderJ. (2010). Comparative integration context theory: participation and belonging in new diverse European cities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(7), 1249–1268. doi:10.1080/01419871003624068.
19.
De BockJ. (2018). Parallel lives revisited. Mediterranean guest workers and their families at work and in the neighbourhood 1960–1980. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
20.
EspirituY. L. (1994). The intersection of race, ethnicity, and class: The multiple identities of second-generation Filipinos. Identities Global Studies in Culture and Power, 1(2–3), 249–273.
FibbiR.WannerP.TopgülC.UgrinaD. (2015). The new second generation in Switzerland. Youth of Turkish and Former Yugoslav descent in Zürich and Basel. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
23.
GansH. J. (1979). Symbolic ethnicity: The future of ethnic groups and cultures in America. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2(1), 1–20.
24.
GansH. J. (1992). Second-generation decline: Scenarios for the economic and ethnic futures of the post-1965 American immigrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 15(2), 173–192.
25.
HoskinsB.JanmaatJ. G.HanC.MuijsD. (2016). Inequalities in the education system and the reproduction of socioeconomic disparities in voting in England, Denmark and Germany: The influence of country context, tracking and self-efficacy on voting intentions of students age 16–18. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(1), 69–92.
26.
HoxJ. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
ImoageneO. (2012). Being British vs being American: Identification among second-generation adults of Nigerian descent in the US and UK. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(12), 2153–2173. doi:10.1080/01419870.2011.631556.
28.
International Labour Organization. (2012). International standard classification of occupations—ISCO-08. Geneva: International Labour Office.
29.
KeatingM. (1996). Nations against the State. The new politics of nationalism in Quebec, Catalonia and Scotland. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
30.
MarsdenA. (2014). Chinese descendants in Italy: Emergence, role and uncertain identity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(7), 1239–1252. doi:10.1080/01419870.2014.883082.
31.
MeeusJ.DuriezB.VanbeselaereN.BoenF. (2010). The role of national identity representation in the relation between in-group identification and out-group derogation: Ethnic versus civic representation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 305–320.
32.
MeinhofU. H.GalasinskiD. (2002). Reconfiguring East-West identities: Cross-generational discourses in German and Polish border communities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(1), 63–82.
33.
MeulemanB.BillietJ. (2003). De houding van Vlamingen tegenover ‘oude’ en ‘nieuwe’ migranten: Diffuus of specifiek? [The attitude of Flemish people towards ‘old’ and ‘new’ migrants: Diffuse or specific?] In APS (Ed.), Vlaanderen gepeild! [Flanders surveyed!] (pp. 137–176). Brussels: Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap [Ministry of the Flemish Community].
34.
PhinneyJ. S. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: Review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 499–514.
35.
PhinneyJ. S.Devich-NavarroM. (1997). Variations in bicultural identification among African American and Mexican American adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 7(1), 3–32.
36.
PhinneyJ. S.OngA. D. (2007). Conceptualization and measurement of ethnic identity: Current status and future directions. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 54(3), 271–281. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.54.3.271.
37.
PlattL. (2014). Is there assimilation in minority groups’ national, ethnic and religious identity?Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(1), 46–70. doi:10.1080/01419870.2013.808756
38.
PortesA.RumbautR. G. (2001). Legacies. The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley, CA and New York, NY: University of California Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
39.
PortesA.ZhouM. (1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 530(1), 74–96. doi:10.1177/0002716293530001006.
40.
PortesA.Fernandez-KellyP.HallerW. (2009). The adaptation of the immigrant second generation in America: Theoretical overview and recent evidence. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(7), 1077–1104. doi:10.1080/13691830903006127.
41.
RunforsA. (2016). What an ethnic lens can conceal: The emergence of a shared racialised identity position among young descendants of migrants in Sweden. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(11), 1846–1863.
42.
SchneiderJ.FokkemaT.MatiasR.StojcicS.UgrinaD.Vera-LarruceaC. (2012). Identities. Urban belonging and intercultural relations. In CrulM.SchneiderJ.LelieF. (Eds.), The European second generation vompared (pp. 285–340). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
43.
Van HeelsumA.KoomenM. (2015). Ascription and identity. Differences between first- and second-generation Moroccans in the way ascription influences religious, national and ethnic group identification. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(2), 277–291. doi:10.1080/1369183x.2015.1102044.
44.
Van KerckemK. (2016). ‘How can I feel Belgian if Belgians don’t accept me?’ Ethnic boundary perception and national identity among Turkish Belgians. In VerdugoR. R.MilneA. (Eds.), National identity. Theory and research (pp. 273–309). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
45.
Van NieuwenhuyseK.WilsK. (2015). Historical narratives and national identities. A qualitative study of young adults in Flanders. Journal of Belgian History, 45(4), 40–73.
46.
Van PraagL.BooneS.StevensP. A.Van HoutteM. (2015). How tracking structures attitudes towards ethnic out-groups and interethnic interactions in the classroom: An ethnographic study in Belgium. Social Psychology of Education, 18(1), 165–184.
47.
VanduynslagerL.WetsJ.NoppeJ.DoyenG. (2013). Vlaamse migratie- en integratiemonitor 2013 [Flemish migration and integration monitor 2013]. Antwerp: Steunpunt Inburgering en Integratie, Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering [Policy Research Centre Integration, Government of Flanders Research Centre].
48.
VathiZ. (2015). Migrating and settling in a mobile world: Albanian migrants and their children in Europe (IMISCOE Research). Dordrecht: Springer.
49.
VerkuytenM. (2005). The social psychology of ethnic identity. Hove: Psychology Press.
50.
Vlaams Economisch Sociaal Overlegcomité [Flemish Economic | Social Consultation Committee]. (2014). Advies monitoren van personen van allochtone afkomst op basis van administratieve databanken [Advice regarding the monitoring of persons of immigrant origin on the basis of administrative databases]. Brussels: Commissie Diversiteit [Commission of Diversity].
51.
WarnerW. L.SroleL. (1945). The social system of American ethnic groups. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
52.
WatersM. C. (1990). Ethnic options. Choosing identities in America. Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA and Oxford: University of California Press.
