This article explores youth narratives concerning the effects of internet anonymity on social ties online. Using an essay-based study of 78 youth (mean age 15.5 years), the effects of internet anonymity on relationships were examined. Results of the qualitative thematic approach showed that anonymity online has led to new forms of relational risk, stemming from misplaced trust or deception. Anonymity was also seen as lessening barriers to relational intimacy, as weak ties could transition to strong ties based on shared interests or social validation. Anonymity was also viewed as enhancing interactive courage and self-expression. Harassment and other negative behaviours were strengthened through anonymity. The dynamics between strong and weak ties were central to risks; here, social tie deception was found to cause harm where an aggressor feigned strong ties in the pursuit of instrumental gain. The findings point to the prominence of the online social effects youth attribute to anonymity.
AllenJ.SzwedoD.MikamiA. (2012) ‘Social Networking Site Use Predicts Changes in Young Adults’ Psychological Adjustment’, Journal of Research on Adolescence22 (3): 453–66.
2.
BarretoManuelaNaomiEllemers (2002) ‘The Impact of Anonymity and Group Identification on Progroup Behavior in Computer-mediated Groups’, Small Group Research33 (5): 590–610.
3.
BerkowitzS. (1982) An Introduction to Structural Analysis: The Network Approach to Social Research. Toronto: Butterworth.
4.
BoydD. (2008) ‘Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life’, in BuckinghamD. (ed.) Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, pp. 119–42. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
ByrneSaharaTheodoreLee (2011) ‘Toward Predicting Youth Resistance to Internet Risk Prevention Strategies’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media55 (1): 90–113.
6.
DavidsonJ.MartelozzoE. (2013) ‘Exploring Young People’s Use of Social Networking Sites and Digital Media in the Internet Safety Context’, Information, Communication & Society16 (9): 1456–76.
7.
DeciE.RyanR. (2000) ‘The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-determination of Behavior’, Psychological Inquiry11 (4): 227–68.
8.
DeciE.RyanR. (2008) ‘Self-determination Theory: A Macrotheory of Human Motivation, Development and Health’, Canadian Psychology49 (3): 182–85.
9.
EllisonN.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2007) ‘The Benefits of Facebook “Friends”: Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12 (4): 1143–68.
10.
FatimahA.GauntlettD. (2013) ‘Young People’s Uses and Understandings of Online Social Networks in their Everyday Lives’, Young21 (2): 111–32.
11.
FrankA. (2002) ‘Why Study People’s Stories? The Dialogical Ethics of Narrative Analysis’, International Institute of Qualitative Methods1 (1): 109–17.
GranovetterM. (1973) ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology73 (1): 1361–80.
14.
GuanS.-S.SubrahmanyamK. (2009) ‘Youth Internet Use: Risks and Opportunities’, Current Opinion in Psychiatry22 (4): 351–56.
15.
HaythornthwaiteC. (1996) ‘Social Network Analysis: An Approach and Technique for the Study of Information Exchange’, Library and Information Science Research18 (4): 323–42.
16.
HaythornthwaiteC. (2002) ‘Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media’, Information Society18 (5): 385–401.
17.
HaythornthwaiteC.WellmanB. (1998) ‘Work, Friendship and Media Use for Information Exchange in a Networked Organization’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science46 (12): 1101–14.
18.
HoltzP.AppelM. (2011) ‘Internet Use and Video Gaming Predict Problem Behavior in Early Adolescence’, Journal of Adolescence34 (1): 49–58.
19.
JoinsonA. (2001) ‘Self-disclosure in Computer-mediate Communication: The Role of Self-awareness and Visual Anonymity’, European Journal of Social Psychology31 (2): 177–92.
20.
JonesL.MitchellK.FinkelhorD. (2011) ‘Trends in Youth Internet Victimization: Findings from Three Youth Internet Safety Surveys 2000–2010’, Journal of Adolescent Health50 (2): 179–86.
21.
KaplanA.HaenleinM. (2009) ‘Consumer Use and Business Potential of Virtual Worlds: The Case of “Second Life”’, International Journal on Media Management11 (3): 93–101.
22.
KavanaughA.ReeseD.CarrollJ.RossonB. (2005) ‘Weak Ties in Networked Communities’, Information Society: An International Journal21 (2): 119–31.
23.
KaveriS.ReichS.WaechterN.EspinozaG. (2008) ‘Online and Offline Social Networks: Use of Social Networking Sites by Emerging Adults’, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology29 (6): 420–33.
24.
KeipiT.OksanenA. (2014) ‘Self-exploration, Anonymity and Risks in the Online Setting: Analysis of Narratives by 14–18-Year Olds’, Journal of Youth Studies17 (8): 1097–113.
25.
KeipiT.OksanenA.RäsänenP. (2015) ‘Who Prefers Anonymous Self-expression Online? A Survey-based Study of Finns Aged 15–30 Years’, Information, Communication & Society18 (6): 717–32.
26.
KimJ.LaroseR.PengW. (2009) ‘Loneliness as the Cause and the Effect of Problematic Internet Use: The Relationship Between Internet Use and Psychological Well-being’, Cyberpsychology & Behavior12 (4): 451–55.
27.
KuntscheE.Simons-MortonB. terBogtT.QueijaI.TinocoV.GaaspardeMatosM.SantinelloM.LenziM. (2009) ‘Electronic Media Communication with Friends from 2002 to 2006 and Links to Face-to-Face Contacts in Adolescence: An HBSC Study in 31 European and North American Countries and Regions’, International Journal of Public Health54 (2): 243–50.
28.
LehdonvirtaV.RäsänenP. (2011) ‘How Do Young People Identify with Online and Offline Peer Groups? A Comparison Between UK, Spain, and Japan’, Journal of Youth Studies14 (1): 91–108.
29.
LeaMartinRussellSpearsde GrootDaphne (2001) ‘Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27 (5): 526–37.
30.
LivingstoneS. (2003) ‘Childrens’ Use of the Internet: Reflections on the Emerging Research Agenda’, New Media & Society5 (2): 147–66.
31.
LivingstoneS. (2008) ‘Taking Risky Opportunities in Youthful Content Creation: Teenagers’ Use of Social Networking for Intimacy, Privacy, and Self-expression’, New Media & Society10 (3): 393–411.
32.
LivingstoneS. (2009) Children and the Internet: Great Expectations and Challenging Realities. Cambridge: Polity.
33.
LivingstoneS.HaddonL. (2009) Kids Online: Opportunities and Risks for Children. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
34.
LivingstoneS.HelsperE. (2010) ‘Balancing Opportunities and Risks in Teenagers’ Use of the Internet: The Role of Online Skills and Internet Self-efficacy’, New Media Society12 (2): 309–29.
35.
MerchantG. (2012) ‘Unraveling the Social Network: Theory and Research’, Learning, Media & Technology37 (1): 4–19.
36.
MorrillC.YaldaC.AdelmanM.MushenoM.BejaranoC. (2000) ‘Telling Tales in School: Youth Culture and Conflict Narratives’, Law and Society Review34 (1): 521–65.
37.
NäsiM.RäsänenP.LehdonvirtaV. (2011) ‘Identification with Online and Offline Communities: Understanding ICT Disparities in Finland’, Technology in Society33 (1): 4–11.
38.
NevesB.de MatosJ.RenteR.MartinsS. (2015) ‘The “non-aligned”: Young People’s Narratives of Rejection of Social Networking Sites’, Young23 (2): 116–35.
39.
OksmanV.TurtiainenJ. (2004) ‘Mobile Communication as a Social Stage Meanings of Mobile Communication in Everyday Life among Teenagers in Finland’, New Media & Society6 (1): 319–39.
40.
PanekE.NardisY.KonrathS. (2013) ‘Mirror or Megaphone? How Relationships between Narcissism and Social Networking Site Use Differ on Facebook and Twitter’, Computers in Human Behavior29 (5): 2004–12.
41.
PfitzmannA.KöhntoppM. (2000) ‘Anonymity, Unobservability, and Pseudonymity: A Proposal for Terminology’, in FederrathH. (ed.) Anonymity. Berlin: Springer.
42.
PostmesTomRussellSpearsKhaledSakhelDe GrootDaphne (2001) ‘Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27 (10): 1243–54.
RäsänenP.KouvoA. (2007) ‘Linked or Divided by the Web? Internet and Sociability in Four European Countries’, Information, Communication & Society10 (2): 219–41.
45.
RourkeL.AndersonT.GarrisonR. (1999) ‘Assessing Social Presence in Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing’, Journal of Distance Education14 (2): 50–71.
46.
RybergT.LarsenM. (2008) ‘Networked Identities: Understanding Relationships between Strong and Weak Ties in Networked Environments’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning24 (2): 103–15.
47.
SheldonPavica (2009) ‘I’ll poke you. You’ll poke me! Self-disclosure, social attraction, predictability and trust as important predictors of Facebook relationships’, Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace3 (2). URL: www.cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2009111101&article=1
48.
SproullL.KieslerS. (1991) Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49.
SteffesE.BurgeeL. (2009) ‘Social Ties and Online Word of Mouth’, Internet Research19 (1): 42–59.
50.
SubrahmanyamK.LinG. (2007) ‘Adolescence on the Net: Internet Use and Well-being’, Adolescence42 (168): 659–77.
51.
ValenzuelaS.ParkN.KeeK. (2009) ‘Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site? Facebook Use and College Students’ Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication14 (4): 875–901.
52.
van der NagelE.FrithJ. (2015) ‘Anonymity, Pseudonymity, and the Agency of Online Identity: Examining the Social Practices of r/Gonewild’, First Monday20 (3). URL: http://firstmonday.org/article/view/5615/4346
53.
WellmanB. (1982) ‘Studying Personal Communities’, in MarsdenP.LinN. (eds) Social Structure and Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
54.
WellmanB.SalaffJ.DimitrovaD.GartonL.GuliaM.HaythornthwaiteC. (1996) ‘Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative work, Telework, and Virtual Community’, Annual Review of Sociology22 (1): 213–38.
55.
WellsM.MitchellK. (2008) ‘How Do High-risk Youth Use the Internet? Characteristics and Implications for Prevention’, Child Maltreatment13 (3): 227–34.
56.
WestlundO.BjurJ. (2014) ‘Media Life of the Young’, Young22 (1): 21–41.
57.
WhiteM. (2000) Reflections on Narrative Practice: Essays and Interviews. Adelaide, Australia: Dulwich Centre Publications.
58.
WhiteM. (2002) ‘Possible Selves: Exploring the Utility of a Narrative Approach’, Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research2 (3): 213–30.
59.
WolakJ.FinkelhorD.MitchellK. (2008) ‘Is Talking to Unknown People Always Risky? Distinguishing Online Interaction Styles in a National Sample of Youth Internet Users’, Cyberpsychology and Behavior11 (3): 340–43.
