This article examines young people’s narratives of rejection of social networking sites (SNSs). It draws upon data of 30 semi-structured interviews with young people aged 18–26 from Portugal. The findings show that reasons for rejecting SNSs are related to three main categories: perceived usefulness of SNSs; specific social practices in SNSs (e.g., disclosure of personal data and gossip); and self-presentation and identity. In addition, our data point to four types of non-users: resisters, rejecters, surrogate users, and potential converts. This typology challenges dichotomies, such as, usage versus non-usage, access versus non-access, and consumption versus non-consumption. Finally, we explore feelings of missing out and social strategies set in place by non-users to cope with the pervasive use of SNSs among young people. We contribute, therefore, to the limited literature on rejection of social media amongst this group, by giving voice to young non-users and their choices.
BourdieuP. (1972) Esquisse d’Une Théorie de la Pratique, Précéde de trois Etudes d’Ethnologie Kabyle. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
2.
BourdieuP. (1979) La Distinction: Critique Sociale du Jugement. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
3.
boydDanah (2008) ‘Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life’, in BuckinghamDavid (ed.) The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning: Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, pp. 119–42. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
4.
boydDanahEllisonNicole (2007) ‘Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(1): 210–30.
BuckinghamDavid (2008) ‘Introducing Identity’, in BuckinghamDavid (ed.) Youth, Identity, and Digital Media: The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, pp. 1–24. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
7.
CooleyC.H. (1992) Human Nature and the Social Order. New Jersey: Transaction Books.
8.
DavisF.D. (1989) ‘Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology’, MIS Quarterly13(3): 319–40.
9.
EllisonN.B.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2007) ‘The Benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(4): 1143–68.
EynonR.GenietsA. (2012) On the Periphery? Understanding Low and Discontinued Internet Use Amongst Young People in Britain. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, Report for the Nominet Trust.
12.
GoffmanE. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
13.
GreifM. (2010) ‘The Hipster in the Mirror’, New York Times, November12.
14.
GreifM.RossK.TortoriciD. (eds) (2010) What Was the Hipster? A Sociological Investigation. n+ 1 Foundation.
15.
HargittaiE. (2007) ‘Whose Space? Differences among Users and Non-users of Social Network Sites’, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication13(1): 276–97.
16.
HaythornthwaiteC. (2005) ‘Social Networks and Internet Connectivity Effects’, Information, Communication & Society8(2): 125–47.
17.
HoofnagleC.KingJ.LiS.TurowJ. (2010) ‘How Different are Young Adults from Older Adults When it Comes to Information Privacy Attitudes and Policies?’, Available at SSRN 1589864.
18.
KollockP.SmithM. (1994) ‘Managing the Virtual Commons’, in HerringSusan (ed) Computer-mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-cultural Perspectives, pp. 109–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19.
ItoM. (2010) Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
20.
JenkinsR. (2004) Social Identity. 2nd edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
21.
KingN.HorrocksC. (2010) Interviews in Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.
22.
LampeC.VitakJ.EllisonN. (2013) ‘Users and Nonusers: Interactions between Levels of Adoption and Social Capital’, in Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative work, pp. 809–20. ACM.
23.
LenhartA.PurcellK.SmithA.ZickuhrK. (2010) Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
MichaelJ. (2013) ‘It’s Really Not Hip to be a Hipster: Negotiating Trends and Authenticity in the Cultural Field, Journal of Consumer Culture, doi: 10.1177/1469540513493206.
29.
MorseJanice M. (2004) ‘Theoretical Saturation’, inLewis-BeckM.BrymanA.E.LiaoT.F. (eds) The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods (Vol. 1), pp. 1123–24. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
30.
NevesB.B. (2009) ‘Are Digital Cities Intelligent? The Portuguese Case’, International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development1(4): 443–63.
31.
NevesB.B. (2013) ‘Social Capital and Internet Use: The Irrelevant, the Bad, and the Good’, Sociology Compass7(8): 599–611.
32.
NevesB.B.AmaroF.FonsecaJ.R. (2013) ‘Coming of (Old) Age in the Digital Age: ICT Usage and Non-usage among Older Adults’, Sociological Research Online18(2): 6.
33.
Portwood-StacerL. (2012) ‘Media Refusal and Conspicuous Non-consumption: The Performative and Political Dimensions of Facebook Abstention’, New Media & Society, 15(7): 1041–57.
34.
ReckwitzA. (2002) ‘Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing’, European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2): 243–63.
35.
SeidmanI. (2006) Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
SpradleyJ. (1979) The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
37.
SteinfieldC.EllisonN.B.LampeC. (2008) ‘Social Capital, Self-esteem, and Use of Online Social Network Sites: A Longitudinal Analysis’, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology29(6): 434–45.
38.
TufekciZ. (2008). ‘Grooming, Gossip, Facebook and MySpace: What Can we Learn About these Sites from those Who Won’t Assimilate?’, Information, Communication & Society11(4): 544–64.
39.
WardeA. (2005) ‘Consumption and Theories of Practice’, Journal of Consumer Culture5(2): 131–53.
40.
WeschM. (2009) ‘YouTube and You: Experiences of Self-awareness in the Context Collapse of the Recording Webcam’, Explorations in Media Ecology8(2): 19–34.
41.
WhiteJoseph R. (2012) ‘Non-aligned Movement’, in ArnoldJ.R.WienerR. (eds) Cold War, pp. 143–55. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
42.
WyattSally (2003) ‘Non-users also Matter: The Construction of Users and Non-users of the Internet’, in OudshoornN.PinchT. (eds) How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technology, pp. 67–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
WyattS.ThomasG.TerranovaT. (2002) ‘They Came, They Surfed, They Went Back to the Beach: Conceptualizing Use and Non-use of the Internet’, in WoolgarS. (ed) Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality, pp. 23–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
