This study asks to what extent similarity in status characteristics (gender and ethnicity) is linked with similarity in anti-school behaviour. We argue that the social forces responsible for homophily-based selection are also at work with regard to homophily-based influence. We use data from the Flemish Educational Assessment Study, which collected complete network data from a representative sample of Flemish secondary school adolescents (N = 11,872). Results indicate that similarity on gender and ethnicity is linked with similarity on behavioural characteristics. Furthermore, the association between status homophily and behavioural homophily is stronger for boys than girls. For minorities, status heterophily on ethnicity is associated with behavioural heterophily, which may be an indication that minority students distance themselves from their majority-group friends.
AboudF.E.MendelsonM.J.PurdyK.T. (2003) ‘Cross-race Peer Relations and Friendship Quality’, International Journal of Behavioral Development27(2): 165–73.
2.
AgnewR. (2005) Pressured into Crime: An Overview of General Strain Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
AkersR.L. (1998) Social Learning and Social Structure. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
4.
Al-MethenA.WilkinsonW.J. (1998) ‘Perceived Causes of Failure among Secondary School Students’, Research in Education48: 26–41.
5.
AnselinL. (1988) Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
6.
BaerveldtC.VölkerB.Van RossemR. (2008) ‘Revisiting Selection and Influence: An Inquiry into the Friendship Networks of High School Students and Their Association with Delinquency’, Revue Canadienne de Criminologie et de Justice Pénale, Octobre, 559–87.
7.
BillyJ.O.G.UdryJ.R. (1985) ‘Patterns of Adolescent Friendship and Effects on Sexual Behavior’, Social Psychology Quarterly48(1): 27–41.
8.
BockE.W.BeeghleyL.MixonA.J. (1983) ‘Religion, Socioeconomic-status, and Sexual Morality: An Application of Reference Group Theory’, Sociological Quarterly24(4): 545–59.
9.
BrutsaertH. (2001) Co-educatie: Studiekansen en kwaliteit van het schoolleven (Coeducation: Study Chances and Quality of School Life). Leuven/Apeldoorn: Garant.
10.
BurtR.S. (1987) ‘A Note on Missing Network Data in the General Social Survey’, Social Networks9(1): 63–73.
11.
DemanetJ.Van HoutteM. (2011a) ‘School Belonging and School Misconduct: Does Sense of Futility Clarify the Picture?’, Sociological Spectrum31(2): 224–56.
12.
ElliottD.S.MenardS. (1996) ‘Delinquent Friends and Delinquent Behavior: Temporal and Developmental Patterns’, in HawkinsJ.D. (ed.) Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories, pp. 28–67. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
EnnettS.T.BaumanK.E. (1994) ‘The Contribution of Influence and Selection to Adolescent Peer Group Homogeneity: The Case of Adolescent Cigarette Smoking’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67(4): 653–66.
14.
EriksonR.GoldthorpeJ.H.PortocareroL. (1979) ‘Intergenerational Class Mobility in 3 Western European Societies: England, France and Sweden’, British Journal of Sociology30(4): 415–41.
15.
FestingerL. (1954) ‘A Theory of Social Comparison Processes’, Human Relations7(2): 117–40.
16.
GiordanoP.C. (2003) ‘Relationships in Adolescence’, Annual Review of Sociology29: 257–81.
17.
HallinanM.T. (1974) The Structure of Positive Sentiments. New York: Elsevier.
18.
HallinanM.T. (1979) ‘The Process of Friendship Formation’, Social Networks1(2): 193–210.
19.
HaynieD.L.OsgoodW.D. (2005) ‘Reconsidering Peers and Delinquency: How Do Peers Matter?’ Social Forces84(2): 1109–30.
20.
HirschiT. (1969) Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
21.
HoutzagerB.BaerveldtC. (1999) ‘Just like Normal: A Social Network Study of the Relation between Petty Crime and Intimacy of Adolescent Friendship’, Social Behavior and Personality27(2): 117–92.
22.
HoxJ. (2002) Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
23.
KandelD.B. (1996) ‘The Parental and Peer Contexts of Adolescent Deviance: An Algebra of Interpersonal Influences’, Journal of Drug Issues26(2): 289–315.
24.
KaoG.JoynerK. (2004) ‘Do Race and Ethnicity Matter among Friends? Activities among Interracial, Interethnic, and Intraethnic Adolescent Friends’, Sociological Quarterly45(3): 557–73.
25.
KnechtA. (2008) Friendship Selection and Friends’ Influence: The Dynamics of Networks and Actor Attributes in Early Adolescence. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.
26.
KuttlerA.La GrecaA.M.PrinsteinM.J. (1999) ‘Friendship Qualities and Social Emotional Functioning of Adolescents with Elose, Cross-sex Friendships’, Journal of Research on Adolescence9(3): 339–66.
27.
LandK.C.DeaneG. (1992) ‘On the Large-sample Estimation of Regression Models with Spatial Effects Terms: A Two-stage Least Squares Approach’, Sociological Methodology22: 221–48.
28.
LearyM.R.KochE.HechenbleiknerN. (2001) ‘Emotional Responses to Interpersonal Rejection’, in LearyM.R. (ed.) Interpersonal Rejection, pp. 145–66. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
LittleC.B.RankinA. (2001) ‘Why Do They Start It? Explaining Reported Early-teen Sexual Activity’, Sociological Forum16(4): 703–29.
30.
MarsdenP.V.FriedkinN.E. (1993) ‘Network Studies of Social Influence’, Sociological Methods and Research22(1): 127–51.
31.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ.M. (2001) ‘Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks’, Annual Review of Sociology27: 415–44.
32.
MertonR.K.RossiA.S. (1968) ‘Contributions to the Theory of Reference Group Behavior’, in MertonR.K. (ed.) Social Theory and Social Structure, pp. 279–334. New York: The Free Press.
33.
MullerC. (1998) ‘Gender Differences in Parental Involvement and Adolescents’ Mathematics Achievement’, Sociology of Education71(4): 336–56.
34.
NewcombT.M. (1961) The Acquaintance Process. New York: Holt.
35.
PiqueroN.L.GoverA.R.MacDonaldJ.M.PiqueroA.R. (2005) ‘The Influence of Delinquent Peers on Delinquency: Does Gender Matter?’ Youth & Society36(3): 251–75.
36.
RaudenbushS.BrykA. (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
37.
ReniersG. (1999) ‘On the History and Selectivity of Turkish and Moroccan Migration to Belgium’, International Migration37(4): 679–713.
38.
SherifM. (1968) ‘The Concept of Reference Groups in Human Relations’, in HymanH.H.SingerE. (eds) Readings in Reference Group Theory and Research, pp. 84–94. New York: The Free Press.
39.
ShrumW.CheekN.H.HunterS.M. (1988) ‘Friendship in School: Gender and Racial Homophily’, Sociology of Education61(4): 227–39.
40.
SievingR.E.EisenbergM.E.PettingellS.SkayC. (2006) ‘Friends’ Influence on Adolescents’ First Sexual Intercourse’, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health38(1): 13–19.
41.
SievingR.E.PerryC.L.WilliamsC.L. (2000) ‘Do Friendships Change Behaviors, or Do Behaviors Change Friendships? Examining Paths of Influence in Young Adolescents’ Alcohol Use’, Journal of Adolescent Health26(1): 27–35.
42.
SpencerM.B.DornbushS.M. (1990) ‘Challenges in Studying Minority Youth’, in FeldmanS.S.ElliottG.R. (eds) At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent, pp. 123–46. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
43.
StewartE.A. (2003) ‘School Social Bonds, School Climate, and School Misbehavior: A Multilevel Analysis’, Justice Quarterly20(3): 575–604.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. (1979) ‘An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict’, in AustinW.G.WorchelS. (eds) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, pp. 33–47. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
46.
UdryJ.R.BillyJ.O.G. (1987) ‘Initiation of Coitus in Early Adolescence’, American Sociological Review52(6): 841–55.
47.
Van HoutteM.StevensP. (2008) ‘Sense of Futility: The Missing Link between Track Position and Self-reported School Misconduct’, Youth and Society40(2): 245–64.
48.
Van HoutteM.Van RossemR. (2006)Vlaams Leerlingen Onderzoek 2004–2005: Verslag voor deelnemende scholen (Flemish Educational Assesment Study 2004–2005: Report for the participating schools). Universiteit Gent, Vakgroep Sociologie.
49.
WarrM. (1993) ‘Parents, Peers, and Delinquency’, Social Forces72(1): 247–64.
50.
WarrM. (2002) Companions in Crime: The Social Aspects of Criminal Conduct. New York: Cambridge University Press.
