The Effect of Familiarity on Distraction and Single Cue Use after Hippocampal Damage

Abstract

Spatial disorientation frequently occurs in conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease that damage the hippocampus, a brain structure necessary for learning and memory. Use of a single cue to mark a submerged escape platform in the Morris water test can reduce spatial disorientation in rats. If the cue used is a familiar one, disoriented rats perform the wayfinding task as well as control animals. However, in a real-world environment, cues rarely occur alone. This study examined whether rats with bilateral hippocampal lesions familiar with a cue performed the Morris water test as well as controls and faster than lesioned rats unfamiliar with the cue when a distracter was present. Bilateral electrolytic lesions were made in male rats that had received either familiarity with a cue or handling only. Familiar lesioned rats were introduced to the distracter on test days 1 (FB1) or 3 (FB3), and unfamiliar lesioned rats on day 3 (UB3). No significant differences were found for FB1 or FB3 rats and their respective controls. FB1 rats increased mean swim times on day 1 compared to preoperative day 4 (16.44 ± 4.3 vs. 4.06 ± 2.1 s, respectively, p< 0.03) but quickly adapted to the distracter. FB3 rats were slower than FB1 rats on day 3 (6.81 ± 1.0 vs. 4.56 ± 0.3 s, respectively, p < 0.05). UB3 rats were impaired on the task compared to FB1 rats on days 3-7 (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that cue familiarity is effective in the presence of a distracter and that the response of disoriented rats to a distracter is influenced by the amount of prior experience with the cue.

Keywords

Cue disorientation wayfinding hippocampus distraction familiarity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bellin C . 1990. Relocating adult day care: Its impact on persons with dementia. J Gerontol Nurs 16:11-14.

Bird M , Alexopoulos P , Adamowicz . 1995. Success and failure in five case studies: Use of cued recall to ameliorate behaviour problems in senile dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 10:305-311

Compton DM , Griffith HR , McDaniel WF , Foster RA , Davis BK . 1997. The flexible use of multiple cue relationships in spatial navigation: A comparison of water maze performance following hippocampal, medial septal, prefrontal cortex or posterior parietal cortex lesions. Neurobiol Learn Mem 68:117-132.

Corkin S . 1984. Lasting consequences of bilateral medial temporal lobectomy: Clinical course and experimental findings in H.M. Semin Neurol 4:249-259.

Coull JT , Nobre AC . 1998. Where and when to pay attention: The neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and MRI. J Neurosci 18:7426-7435.

DiMattia BD , Kesner RP . 1988. Spatial cognitive maps: Differential role of the parietal cortex and hippocampal formation. Behav Neurosci 102:471-480.

Fremouw T , Jackson-Smith P , Kesner RP . 1997. Impaired place learning and unimpaired cue learning in hippocampal-lesioned pigeons. Behav Neurosci 111:963-975.

Gage PD . 1985. Performance of hippocampectomized rats in a reference/working memory task: Effects of preoperative versus postoperative training. Physiol Psychol 13:235-242.

Hall JF . 1956. The relationship between external stimulation, food deprivation and activity. J Comp Physiol Psychol 49:339-341.

10.

Heston LL , White J . 1991. The vanishing mind: A practical guide to Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. New York: WH Freeman.

11.

Hetherington PA , Shapiro ML . 1997. Hippocampal place fields are altered by the removal of single visual cues in a distance dependent manner. Behav Neurosci 111:20-34.

12.

Holden JE , Therrien B . 1993. Cue familiarity reduces spatial disorientation following hippocampal damage. Nurs Res 42:338-343.

13.

Hughey DJ , Koppenaal RJ . 1987. Hippocampal lesions in rats alter learning about intramaze cues. Behav Neurosci 101:634-643.

14.

Jarrard LE , Okaichi H , Steward O , Goldschmidt RB . 1984. On the role of hippocampal connections in the performance of place and cue tasks: Comparisons with damage to hippocampus. Behav Neurosci 98:946-954.

15.

Kolb B , Walkey J . 1987. Behavioral and anatomical studies of the posterior parietal cortex in the rat. Behav Brain Res 23:127-145.

16.

Maguire EA , Burke T , Phillips J , Stauton H . 1996. Topographical disorientation following unilateral temporal lobe lesions in humans. Neuropsychologia 34:993-1001.

17.

Martin PD , O’Keefe J . 1998. Place field dynamics and directionality in a spatial memory task. Brain Res 783:249-261.

18.

Martino-Saltzman D , Blasch BB , Morris RD , McNeal LW . 1991. Travel behavior of nursing home residents perceived as wanderers and nonwanderers. Gerontologist 31:666-672.

19.

McNaughton BL , Barnes CA , O’Keefe J . 1983. The contributions of position, direction and velocity to single unit activity in the hippocampus of the freely moving rat. Exp Brain Res 52:41-49.

20.

Means LW , Douglas RJ . 1970. Effects of hippocampal lesions on cue utilization in spatial discrimination in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 73:254-260.

21.

Morris RGM , Garrud P , Rawlins JNP , O’Keefe J . 1982. Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature 297:681-683.

22.

Nightingale F . 1969. Notes on nursing: What it is and what it is not. New York: Dover.

23.

Keefe J , Nadel L . 1978. The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Clarendon.

24.

Pigott S , Milner B . 1990. Memory for different aspects of complex visual scenes after right anterior temporal lobectomy. Soc Neurosci Abstr 16:26-26.

25.

Raphaelson AC , Isaacson RL , Douglas RJ . 1965. The effect of distracting stimuli on the runway performance of limbic damaged rats. Psychon Sci 3:483-484.

26.

Riddell WI , Rothblat LA , Wilson WA Jr . 1969. Auditory and visual distraction in hippocampectomized rats. J Comp Physiol Psych 67:216-219.

27.

Samsonovich A , McNaughton BL . 1997. Path integration and cognitive mapping in a continuous attractor neural network model. J Neurosci 17:5900-5920.

28.

Savé E , Buhot M-C , Foreman N , Thinus-Blanc C . 1992. Exploratory activity and response to a spatial change in rats with hippocampal or posterior parietal cortical lesions. Behav Brain Res 47:113-127.

29.

Schenk F , Morris RGM . 1985. Dissociation between components of spatial memory in rats after recovery from the effects of retro-hippocampal lesions. Exp Brain Res 58:11-28.

30.

Scoville WB , Milner B . 1957. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20:11-21.

31.

Seigal AW. . 1981. The externalization of cognitive maps in children and adults: In search of ways to ask better questions. In: Liben LS , Patterson AH , Newcombe, N , editors. Spatial representation and behavior across the life span. New York: Academic Press. p 167-194.

32.

Speakman A , O’Keefe J . 1990. Hippocampal complex spike cells do not change their place fields if the goal is moved within a cue controlled environment. Eur J Neurosci 2:544-555.

33.

Swanson LW , Kohler C , Bjorkland A . 1987. The limbic region. 1: The septohippocampal system. In: Bjorkland A , Hokfelt T , Swanson LW , editors. Handbook of chemical neuroanatomy: Vol. 5. Integrated systems of the CNS part 1. New York: Elsevier. p 125-278.

34.

Taube JS . 1998. Head direction cells and the neurophysiological basis for a sense of direction. Prog Neurobiol 55:225-256.

35.

Winocur G . 1982. Radial arm maze behavior by rats with dorsal hippocampal lesions: Effects of cueing. J Comp Physiol Psych 96:155-169.

36.

Xavier GF , Stein C , Bueno OFA . 1990. Rats with dorsal hippocampal lesions do react to new stimuli but not to spatial changes of known stimuli. Behav Neural Biol 54:172-183.