Homogenization-based topology optimization of auxetic honeycomb sandwich beams

Abstract

While topology optimization has gained substantial popularity in recent times, its application in the design of functionally graded auxetic sandwich beams is still relatively limited. This study presents a topology optimization framework for the design of functionally graded auxetic honeycomb sandwich beams and systematically investigates their flexural behaviour, energy absorption characteristics, and deformation modes under three-point bending loading. To support the optimization process, expressions for the homogenized in-plane mechanical properties of honeycomb cellular materials with various microstructures maintained within a fixed unit cell confined space were derived analytically and validated experimentally. Topology-optimized, standard auxetic, and Poisson’s ratio-coupled hybrid sandwich beams were numerically modelled and comprehensively compared under identical relative density and boundary conditions. The topology-optimized sandwich beams demonstrate superior performance across all sandwich beams, achieving superior flexural stiffness, load bearing, and energy absorption capabilities while exhibiting a combined local-global deformation mode that engages a substantially greater number of unit cells compared to the predominantly localized deformation observed in standard beams. Von Mises stress analysis confirms broader spatial stress engagement and more efficient material utilization in the topology-optimized beams. Moreover, the hybrid sandwich beams outperform the standard sandwich beams in flexural and energy absorption properties. Unit cell orientation in standard beams and the relative positioning of unit cells in hybrid sandwich beams are identified as significant design parameters influencing flexural properties. These findings demonstrate that integrating an auxetic lattice core with topology optimization constitutes an effective and versatile strategy for designing lightweight sandwich structures with enhanced mechanical performance.

Keywords

sandwich beams homogenization topology optimization additive manufacturing cellular materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bendsøe

Kikuchi

. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 1988; 71(2): 197–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2

Bendsøe

. Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim 1989; 1(4): 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01650949

Coluccia

Meyer

Liseni

, et al. Functionally graded lattice structures for energy absorption: numerical analysis and experimental validation. Compos Struct 2025; 360: 119013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119013

Teik

CLIM

. Functionally graded beam for attaining Poisson-curving. J Mater Sci Lett 2002; 21(24): 1899–1901.

Shen

H-S

Wang

. Nonlinear bending of sandwich beams with functionally graded negative Poisson’s ratio honeycomb core. Compos Struct 2019; 212: 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.020

Boldrin

Hummel

Scarpa

, et al. Dynamic behaviour of auxetic gradient composite hexagonal honeycombs. Compos Struct 2016; 149: 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.044

Georges

García Solera

Aguilar Borasteros

, et al. Mechanical performance comparison of sandwich panels with graded lattice and honeycomb cores. Biomimetics 2024; 9(2): 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9020096

Chen

Liu

Wang

, et al. Multi-scale topology optimization using neural networks. Eng Comput 2025; 41(5): 3313–3327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-025-02156-6

Jiang

Teng

. Two-scale concurrent topology optimization of lattice structures with multiple microstructures subjected to dynamic load. Optim Eng 2025; 26(3): 1669–1698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-024-09950-z

10.

Chen

, et al. Crashworthiness and optimization of novel concave thin-walled tubes. Compos Struct 2022; 283: 115109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115109

11.

du Plessis

Broeckhoven

Yadroitsava

, et al. Beautiful and functional: a review of biomimetic design in additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 2019; 27: 408–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.033

12.

Plocher

Panesar

. Review on design and structural optimisation in additive manufacturing: towards next-generation lightweight structures. Mater Des 2019; 183: 108164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108164

13.

Xue

Wei

, et al. Mechanics of inner core debonding of composite sandwich beam with CFRP hexagonal honeycomb. Int J Solid Struct 2024; 293: 112760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2024.112760

14.

Strek

Jopek

Nienartowicz

. Dynamic response of sandwich panels with auxetic cores. Physica Status Solidi (B) 2015; 252(7): 1540–1550. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.201552024

15.

Najafi

Ahmadi

Liaghat

. Investigation on the flexural properties of sandwich beams with auxetic core. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 2022; 44(2): 61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03368-3

16.

Teimouri

Alinia

Kamarian

, et al. Design optimization of additively manufactured sandwich beams through experimentation, machine learning, and imperialist competitive algorithm. J Eng Des 2024; 35(3): 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2024.2309862

17.

Shen

H-S

Yang

. Multi-scale modeling and numerical analysis of sandwich beams with FG auxetic 3D lattice cores and GRC face sheets subjected to drop-weight impacts. Eng Struct 2022; 265: 114486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114486

18.

Shen

H-S

Yang

. Design and nonlinear dynamics of FG curved sandwich beams with self-adapted auxetic 3D double-V meta-lattice core. Eng Struct 2022; 272: 115023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115023

19.

Zhao

Wei

Wen

, et al. Bending response and energy absorption of sandwich beams with novel auxetic honeycomb core. Eng Struct 2021; 247: 113204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113204

20.

Wang

Shao

Zhang

, et al. Three-point bending response and energy absorption of novel sandwich beams with combined re-entrant double-arrow auxetic honeycomb cores. Compos Struct 2023; 326: 117606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117606

21.

Wang

. Bending behavior of sandwich composite structures with tunable 3D-printed core materials. Compos Struct 2017; 175: 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.001

22.

Shaoyu

Tiantian

Zian

, et al. Mechanical properties of sandwich composites with 3d-printed auxetic and non-auxetic lattice cores under low velocity impact mechanical properties of sandwich composites with 3d-printed auxetic and non-auxetic lattice cores under low velocity impact. Mater Des 2018; 160: 1305–1321.

23.

Goswami

. On the prediction of effective material properties of cellular hexagonal honeycomb core. J Reinforc Plast Compos 2006; 25(4): 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684405060567

24.

Gibson

Ashby

Schajer

, et al. The mechanics of two-dimensional cellular materials. Proc Roy Soc Lond A 1982; 382(1782): 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1982.0087

25.

Abd El-Sayed

Jones

Burgess

. A theoretical approach to the deformation of honeycomb based composite materials. Composites 1979; 10(4): 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(79)90021-1

26.

Masters

Evans

. Models for the elastic deformation of honeycombs. Compos Struct 1996; 35(4): 402–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0263-8223(96)00054-2

27.

Marchal

Shujie

Zhang

, et al. Multiscale periodic homogenization for additive manufacturing of honeycomb lattices. Int J Solid Struct 2024; 302: 112974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2024.112974

28.

Zamani

Heidari-Rarani

Mirkhalf

. Design, optimization and additive manufacturing of an innovative bike helmet using auxetic metastructures. Int J Solid Struct 2025; 310: 113240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2025.113240

29.

Jin

Korkolis

. Shear resistance of an auxetic chiral mechanical metamaterial. Int J Solid Struct 2019; 174-175: 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.06.005

30.

Veisi

Farrokhabadi

. Investigation of the equivalent material properties and failure stress of the re-entrant composite lattice structures using an analytical model. Compos Struct 2021; 257: 113161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113161

31.

Khan

Rahman

Khraisheh

, et al. Advances in 3D printed periodic lattice structures for energy research: energy storage, transport and conversion applications. Mater Des 2024; 239: 112773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2024.112773

32.

Liu

Yang

, et al. In-plane elastic properties of a 2D chiral cellular structure with V-shaped wings. Eng Struct 2020; 210: 110384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110384

33.

Moeini

Begon

Lévesque

. Numerical homogenization of a linearly elastic honeycomb lattice structure and comparison with analytical and experimental results. Mech Mater 2022; 167: 104210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2022.104210

34.

Alomarah

Zhang

Ruan

, et al. Mechanical properties of the 2D Re-entrant honeycomb made via direct metal printing. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2017; 229(1): 12038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/229/1/012038

35.

Jin

Zhou

Wang

, et al. Experimental study on the effects of specimen in-plane size on the mechanical behavior of aluminum hexagonal honeycombs. Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process 2015; 635: 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.03.053

36.

Bruson

Galati

Calignano

, et al. Mechanical characterisation and simulation of the tensile behaviour of polymeric additively manufactured lattice structures. Exp Mech 2023; 63(7): 1117–1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-023-00976-5

37.

Andreassen

Clausen

Schevenels

, et al. Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code. Struct Multidiscip Optim 2011; 43(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0594-7

38.

Wang

Zhu

, et al. Concurrent design of hierarchical structures with three-dimensional parameterized lattice microstructures for additive manufacturing. Struct Multidiscip Optim 2020; 61: 869–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02408-2

39.

Sigmund

. A 99 line topology optimization code written in matlab. Struct Multidiscip Optim 2001; 21(2): 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001580050176

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.21 MB

0.00 MB