Composite foam sandwich structures are widely employed in aerospace and other advanced engineering fields due to excellent mechanical properties. During manufacturing and service, composite foam sandwich structures are inevitably subjected to various impacts, including flexible and repeated impacts, which introduce complex damage and severely threaten structural integrity and service life. This study presents an experimental investigation into the response of CFRP/PMI foam sandwich panels subjected to single and repeated flexible impacts. The impact response, energy absorption efficiency, and interlaminar damage evolution (characterized via C-scan) were analyzed under varying impact energies and numbers of impacts. The residual compressive strength after impact was further investigated through compression-after-impact (CAI) tests on impacted and inspected foam sandwich panels. Residual strength values and failure modes of the panels were obtained under different impact energies and numbers of impacts. In addition, correlations between single-impact energy and repeated impacts at equivalent damage levels were established. The results indicate that a limited number of repeated low-energy impacts resulted in damage comparable to that from a moderate-energy single impact, while a greater number of such repeated impacts produced damage equivalent to a high-energy single impact.
LuoZ. Study on multiple low velocity impact properties of stitched foam sandwich composites. Nanchang university, 2022.
2.
ZhangYWangZWangC, et al.Investigation on low-velocity impact performance of composite sandwich structure. Electro-Mechanical Engineering2024; 40(02): 1–5+29.
3.
WeiMChengLMuhuoYU, et al.Low-velocity impact properties of foam sandwich composites with different thicknesses prepared via thermal expansion molding process. Acta Mater Compos Sin2024; 41(03): 1611–1625.
4.
YangKZhangZYangL, et al.Influence of foam core thickness on impact performance of carbon fiber composite sandwich panel. Materials Reports2021; 35(S2): 579–582.
5.
ZhuY. Study on low-velocity impact resistance of aluminum foam sandwich composite structure. Harbin Institute of Technology, 2021.
6.
SadighiMAlderliestenR. Impact fatigue, multiple and repeated low-velocity impacts on FRP composites: a review. Compos Struct2022; 297: 115962.
7.
ZanganaSEpaarachchiJFerdousW, et al., Behaviour of continuous fibre composite sandwich core under low-velocity impact. Thin-Walled Struct2021; 158: 107157.
MaWTuoHDengQ, et al.Damage behavior of composite honeycomb sandwich structure subject to low-velocity impact and compression-after-impact using experimental and numerical methods. Thin-Walled Struct2024; 205(Part C): 112594.
10.
FengDAymerichF. Effect of core density on the low-velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich composites. Compos Struct2020; 239: 112040.
11.
TopkayaTSolmazYM. Investigation of low velocity impact behaviors of honeycomb sandwich composites[J]. J Mech Sci Technol2018; 32(7): 3161–3167.
12.
Cagla BalabanATeeKFEvren ToygarM. Low velocity impact behaviour of sandwich composite structures with E-Glass/Epoxy facesheets and PVC foam. Procedia Struct Integr2019; 18: 577–585.
13.
LiuXQuJMaoJ, et al.Mechanical responses and damage characteristics of the high-velocity impact of ice projectiles on foam sandwich structure. Int J Impact Eng2024; 191: 104994.
14.
AhmadiEAtrianAJafari FesharakiJ, et al.Experimental and numerical assessment of high-velocity impact behavior of syntactic foam core sandwich structures. Eur J Mech Solid2021; 90: 104355.
15.
LiJZhangWWangZ, et al.Dynamic response and failure of CFRP kagome lattice core sandwich panels subjected to low-velocity impact. Int J Impact Eng2023; 181: 104737.
16.
ChenCFangHZhuL, et al.Low-velocity impact properties of foam-filled composite lattice sandwich beams: experimental study and numerical simulation. Compos Struct2023; 306: 116573.
17.
BalcıOÇobanOÖzgür BoraM, et al.Experimental investigation of single and repeated impacts for repaired honeycomb sandwich structures. Mater Sci Eng, A2017; 682: 23–30.
18.
HaghgooMSadighiMMohammadi AghdamM, et al.Repeated and multiple hail impacts on honeycomb sandwich panels: an experimental and numerical study. Compos Struct2025; 360: 119055.
19.
GuoKZhuLLiY, et al.Numerical study on mechanical behavior of foam core sandwich plates under repeated impact loadings. Compos Struct2019; 224: 111030.
20.
ZhuLGuoKLiY, et al.Experimental study on the dynamic behaviour of aluminium foam sandwich plates under single and repeated impacts at low temperature. Int J Impact Eng2018; 114: 123–132.
21.
CaiWZhuLZhengK, et al.Experimental and analytical investigations on single and repetitive impact failure responses of composite sandwich panels with orthogonal woven GFRP facesheets and PVC foam cores. Int J Impact Eng2024; 194: 105064.
22.
ZnikerHOuakiBSaidB, et al.Energy absorption and damage characterization of GFRP laminated and PVC-Foam sandwich composites under repeated impacts with reduced energies and quasi-static indentation. Case Stud Constr Mater2022; 16: e00844.
23.
HuangZ-CTangN-LJiangY-Q, et al.Effect of repeated impacts on the mechanical properties of nickel foam composite plate/AA5052 self-piercing riveted joints. J Mater Res Technol2023; 23: 4691–4701.
24.
ZhuKZhengXSunJ, et al.The relationship between repeated impacts and CAI strength of sandwich structure considering different impactor shape in individual impact. Eng Struct2024; 305: 117720.
25.
LiuXMaoJQuJ, et al.Dynamic response of foam sandwich structures under multiple ice projectiles impacts at high velocity. J Sandw Struct Mater2024; 26(7): 1015–1036.
26.
RanMZhuKNiH, et al.Effect of boundary constraint on damage competition and CAI strength of composite honeycomb sandwich structure under impact considering different positions. Thin-Walled Struct2026; 218: 114083.
27.
MunirajDSreehariVM. Damage assessment of sandwich structures with Al/SiC functionally graded plasma sprayed faceplates subjected to single and repeated impacts. Compos Struct2022; 287: 115369.
28.
AkatayABoraMÖÇobanO, et al.The influence of low velocity repeated impacts on residual compressive properties of honeycomb sandwich structures. Compos Struct2015; 125: 425–433.
29.
LiuKKangS-BGaoS. Experimental and analytical study on impact response of stainless steel-aluminium foam-alloy steel sandwich panels. Int J Impact Eng2023; 179: 104661.
30.
TangQHeQChenX. Mesoscopic simulation study on density gradient metallic foam sandwich panels under hypervelocity impact. Thin-Walled Struct2025; 208: 112762.
31.
SeyednouraniMAkgunSUlusH, et al.Impact damage and low temperature effects on carbon fiber/epoxy joints: a comparative study of hybrid bolted/bonded and bolted configurations with cross-ply and angle-ply laminates. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2025; 190: 108677.
32.
ASTM Committee D30 on Composite Materials. Standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight impact event: ASTM D7136/D7136 M-15. ASTM International, 2015.
33.
MaheshVJoladarashiSKulkarniSM. An experimental investigation on low-velocity impact response of novel jute/rubber flexible bio-composite. Compos Struct2019; 225: 111190.
34.
JanKThomasSVeidtM, et al.Impact and post-impact properties of hybrid-matrix laminates based on carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy and elastomer subjected to low-velocity impacts. Compos Struct2019; 208: 535–545.
35.
LiXLiangBLiuP, et al.Experimental and numerical analysis of low-velocity impact damage of CFRP laminates with rubber protective layer. Compos Struct2022; 300: 116152.
36.
ASTM Committee D30 on Composite Materials. Standard test method for compressive residual strength properties of damaged polymer matrix composite plates: ASTM D7137/D7137 M-17. ASTM International, 2017.
37.
MallekHMellouliHAllouchM, et al.Energy absorption of 3D-printed PETG and PETG/CF sandwich structures with cellular cores subjected to low-velocity impact: experimental and numerical analysis. Eng Struct2025; 327: 119653.
38.
AfrasiabiAMohammadiHHashemniaK. Optimized design of car frontal bumper with aluminum foam sandwich structure under low velocity impacts. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2024; 46(10): 591.
