This study investigates the interfacial bonding reliability of CFRP/PVC foam core sandwich composites fabricated via a one-shot co-curing process without adhesive film, aiming to overcome the limitations of conventional multi-step bonding methods. Various types of carbon fiber prepregs were co-cured with a PVC foam core in a single-step process using either an oven or a hot press. To assess the bonding strength, mechanical testing, optical microscopy, and ultrasonic testing were conducted, focusing on the resin impregnation into the core. The results showed that the 3K and 12K configurations achieved sufficient bonding strength even without adhesive film, with failures mainly occurring within the foam core. The strengths of the adhesive-less composite was as acceptable as only 0–3.63% difference in average was observed with 5.75–9.34% weight reduction and 19.22–29.74% cost saving in compared to the conventional composite. In contrast, the UD and 6K configurations exhibited interfacial debonding because of insufficient resin impregnation to the foam core. Ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation analyzed the interfacial bonding at the interface. This study revealed the structural feasibility of adhesive-free one-shot co-curing. The proposed method enables reliable sandwich composite manufacturing without adhesive film, enhancing the lightweight and cost.
AbdalslamS.Impact damage analysis of balsa wood sandwich composite materials, 2013.
5.
JangWCRohHD. Sandwich composites manufacturing: a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Int J Precis Eng Manuf2025; 26: 2093–2109.
6.
MorettiLOlivierPCastaniéB, et al.Experimental study and in-situ FBG monitoring of process-induced strains during autoclave co-curing, co-bonding and secondary bonding of composite laminates. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2021; 142: 106224.
7.
YalkinHEIctenBMAlpyildizT. Enhanced mechanical performance of foam core sandwich composites with through the thickness reinforced core. Compos B Eng2015; 79: 383–391.
8.
OngMSilvaA. Effects of low-velocity-impact on facesheet-core debonding of natural-core composite sandwich structures—A review of experimental research. J Compos Sci2024; 8(1): 23.
9.
CheonSYuSKimKY, et al.Improvement of interfacial bonding force between PMI foam and CFRP in PMI foam-cored CFRP sandwich composites. Fibers Polym2021; 22: 2281–2284.
10.
UddinMGandyHTNRahmanMM, et al.Adhesiveless honeycomb sandwich structures of prepreg carbon fiber composites for primary structural applications. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater2019; 2: 339–350.
11.
PappadaSRamettaRPassaroA, et al.Processing, mechanical properties, and interfacial bonding of a thermoplastic core-foam/composite-skin sandwich panel. Adv Polym Technol2010; 29(3): 137–145.
12.
GalehdariSAKadkhodayanM. Collapse of honeycomb cell as a result of buckling or plastic hinges: analytical, numerical and experimental study. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2019; 41: 154.
13.
WangZLiZZhouW, et al.On the influence of structural defects for honeycomb structure. Compos B Eng2018; 142: 183–192.
GarayACSouzaJAAmicoSC. Evaluation of mechanical properties of sandwich structures with polyethylene terephthalate and polyvinyl chloride core. J Sandw Struct Mater2016; 18(2): 229–241.
16.
LiuHAntwi-AfariMFMiH, et al.Research on the feasibility of polyethylene terephthalate foam used in wind turbine blades. Environ Prog Sustain Energy2023; 42(1): e13956.
17.
HooFMSVedireARPakalaAK. Effect of temperature on the mechanical behavior of pvc foams. J Cell Plast2024; 60(5-6): 261–281.
18.
RazaliNMansorMROmarG, et al.Out-of-autoclave as a sustainable composites manufacturing process for aerospace applications. In: SapuanSMMansorMR (eds). Design for Sustainability. Elsevier, 2021, pp. 395–413.
19.
EkuaseOAAnjumNEzeVO, et al.A review on the out-of-autoclave process for composite manufacturing. J Compos Sci2022; 6(6): 172.
RochaHRochaAMalheiroJ, et al.Development and manufacturing of a fibre reinforced thermoplastic composite spar produced by oven vacuum bagging. Polymers2024; 16(15): 2216.
bin YaakobMYJenniseTTTSihombingH, et al.Tensile properties of angle cured laminated composites structures under gravity effects. Appl Mech Mater2013; 465–466: 101–105.
25.
HaschenburgerAMenkeNStüveJ. Sensor-based leakage detection in vacuum bagging. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2021; 116(5–6): 2413–2424. doi:10.1007/s00170-021-07505-5.
26.
ZhaoCHZhangGC. Effect of gravity on resin flow behavior by VARI process. Adv Mat Res2012; 557–559: 1471–1474.
27.
YanCLiYSuX, et al.Resin flow analysis for the foam core sandwich spoiler by vacuum-assisted resin injection process. Materials2022; 15(15): 5279.
28.
ASTM International. ASTM C297/C297M: standard test method for flatwise tensile strength of sandwich constructions. ASTM International, 2016.
29.
ASTM International. ASTM E2580-17: standard practice for ultrasonic testing of flat panel composites and sandwich core materials. ASTM International, 2017.
30.
CenderTASimacekPAdvaniSG. Resin film impregnation in fabric prepregs with dual length scale permeability. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2013; 53: 118–128.
KarabutovAAPodymovaNB. Quantitative analysis of the influence of voids and delaminations on acoustic attenuation in CFRP composites by the laser-ultrasonic spectroscopy method. Compos B Eng2014; 56: 238–244.
33.
HidayatDSetiantoS. Control of tungsten-epoxy composite porosity prepared using a high-energy ball milling method: an engineering aspect of backing layer fabrication. J Sci Adv Mater Devices2024; 9: 100793.
34.
YilmazBAsokkumarAJasiūnienėE, et al.Air-coupled, contact, and immersion ultrasonic non-destructive testing: Comparison for bonding quality evaluation. Appl Sci2020; 10(19): 6757.
35.
Vijaya KumarRLBhatMRMurthyCRL. Some studies on evaluation of degradation in composite adhesive joints using ultrasonic techniques. Ultrasonics2013; 53(4): 1150–1162.
36.
RokhlinSILavrentyevAILiB. Research: ultrasonic evaluation of environmental durability of adhesive joints.
37.
DequineDLRushC. Continuous fiber composite part cost vs production volume by manufacturing process and material. Lockheed Martin, 2014, p. 23.
