This article reports on original laboratory and numerical investigations into the static axial pull-out behaviour of blind rivets from a sandwich roof panel. Laboratory testing identified three primary failure mechanisms: core shear, pulling of the blind rivet through the facing, and rivet rupture. Force and displacement measurements were recorded using transducers and digital image correlation. Material tests were also conducted on the facings and the core of the sandwich panel. On the basis of the laboratory tests, a numerical model of the experiment was developed in the Abaqus CAE environment. Very good agreement was achieved between the laboratory and numerical test results.
LabaranYHMathurVSMuhammadSU, et al.Carbon footprint management: a review of construction industry. Clean Eng Technol2022; 9: 100531.
2.
MaierPLDurhamSA. Beneficial use of recycled materials in concrete mixtures. Constr Build Mater2012; 29: 428–437.
3.
QasimOAHilalNAl BiajawiMI, et al.Studying the usability of recycled aggregate to produce new concrete. J Eng Appl Sci2024; 71: 129.
4.
BoldriniAKoolenDCrijns-GrausW, et al.The impact of decarbonising the iron and steel industry on European power and hydrogen systems. Appl Energy2024; 361: 122902.
5.
LiJTianJZhanD, et al.Designing a new ultra-high strength steel with multicomponent precipitates under material genetic design. J Mater Res Technol2024; 33: 4449–4461.
6.
EN 1993-1-1:2022 eurocode 3 - design of steel structures - part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings.
7.
CarrollPChesserMLyonsP. Air source heat pumps field studies: a systematic literature review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2020; 134: 110275.
8.
DadaMPopoolaP. Recent advances in solar photovoltaic materials and systems for energy storage applications: a review. Beni Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci2023; 12: 66.
9.
StudzińskiR. Experimental investigation of the use of blind rivets in sandwich panels. J Sandw Struct Mater2021; 23(8): 3669–3684.
10.
StudzińskiRCiesielczykK. Use of Blind Rivets in Sandwich Panels – Experimental Investigation of Static and Quasi-Cyclic Loading Buildings2020; 10/9: 155.
11.
MisiekTKäppleinS. Fastening to face sheets of sandwich panels. Ce/Papers2017; 1: 1746–1755.
12.
BiccariDGenoveseKPappalettereC. Static and fatigue behaviour of sandwich composite panels joined by blind fasteners. Key Eng Mater2001; 221–222: 61–70.
13.
EN ISO 6892-1:2020-05 metallic materials – tensile testing – part 1: method of test at room temperatureEuropean Committee for Standardization, Brussels, 2020.
14.
EN 14509: 2013 self-supporting double skin metal faced insulating panels - factory made products – specificationsEuropean Committee for Standardization, Brussels, 2013.
15.
EN ISO 29469:2023-05 compressive strength and modulus of the core material. European Committeefor Standardization (CEN), Brussels, 2023.
16.
Chuda-KowalskaMPozorskiZGarsteckiA. Experimental determination of shear rigidity of sandwich panels with soft core. In: 10th international conference modern buildings materials, structures and techniques, Lithuania, 19–21 May 2010, Springer, pp. 56–63.
17.
TuwairHHopkinsMVolzJ, et al.Evaluation of sandwich panels with various polyurethane foam-cores and ribs. Composites Part B2015; 79: 262–276.
18.
da Costa DiasTOttoniTPWink de MenezesEA, et al.Experimental and numerical investigation of shear strain and failure in sandwich panels with foamcore and jute/glass composite faces under 3-point bending. Mech Adv Mater Struct2024; 32(15): 1–24.
19.
CaliskanUApalakMK. Flexural impact response and damage detection of composite sandwich beam with various PVC foam cores. Mech Adv Mater Struct2022; 29: 1276–1293.
20.
StudzińskiRCiesielczykK. Connection stiffness between thin-walled beam and sandwich panel. J Sandw Struct Mater2019; 21: 2042–2056.
21.
SharafTFamA. Analysis of large scale cladding sandwich panels composed of GFRP skins and ribs and polyurethane foam core. Thin-Walled Struct2013; 71: 91–101.
22.
DinuFNeaguCSenilaM. Wall sandwich panels with steel facings and PUR foam core under transverse loading: experimental testing and numerical model calibration. Eng Struct2024; 321: 119014.
23.
NaikRKPandaSKRacherlaV. Failure analysis of metal-polymer-metal sandwich panels with wire mesh interlayers: finite element modeling and experimental validation. Compos Struct2022; 280: 114813.
24.
GhimireSChenJ. Predicting fracture mechanisms in synthetic foam sandwiches with multi-layered cores using extended cohesive damage model. Eng Fract Mech2020; 223: 106719.
25.
SaeidAADonaldsonSL. Experimental and finite element evaluations of debonding in composite sandwich structure with core thickness variations. Adv Mech Eng2016; 8: 18.
26.
ApostolDAStuparuFConstantinescuDM, et al.Experimental and xfem analysis of mode II propagating crack in a polyurethane foam. Mater Plast2016; 53(4): 685-688.
27.
MarsavinaLConstantinescuDMLinulE, et al.Experimental and numerical crack paths in PUR foams. Eng Fract Mech2016; 167: 68–83.
KropfBCvahtePArzenšekM, et al.Cold rolling technology optimization for EN AW 4343/3003/4343 cladded aluminum alloys and influence of parameters on microstructure, mechanical properties and sustainable recyclability. Metals2024; 14(2): 230.
