The load response, energy absorption, different damage mechanisms and failure modes of sandwich panels subjected to complete perforation by quasi-static indentation and the insights gleaned are presented in this paper. The experimental campaign was carried out on samples made of different type of facesheets: Aluminium, glass fibre-reinforced plastic and metal-composite hybrid (combined aluminium and GFRP) with two different core heights. Reliable numerical models were developed with appropriate constitutive material and damage model for facesheets and honeycomb core to complement the experimental observations. Good agreement between experimental results and numerical predictions in terms of force-displacement response and perforation damage ensure the fidelity of the developed numerical model. Effects of facesheet type, core height, energy absorbed by the constituent layers, damage evolution history are briefly discussed. It was observed that the energy absorption of sandwich panels and peak indentation force resisted by the top and bottom facesheet are strongly dependent on its metal-volume fraction, whilst unaffected with the height of the core. Recommendations for developing computationally efficient numerical models were provided.
HawkJ. The Boeing 787 dreamliner: more than an airplane. In: Presented at the AIAA/AAAF aircraft noise and emissions reduction symposium, Monterey, California, 24–26 May 2005.
2.
BarberoESanchez-SaezSZaeraR, et al. Compression after impact of thin composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65: 1911–1919.
3.
SunGChenDHuoX, et al. Experimental and numerical studies on indentation and perforation characteristics of honeycomb sandwich panels. Compos Struct2018; 184: 110–124.
ManesAGilioliASbarufattiC, et al. Experimental and numerical investigations of low velocity impact on sandwich panels. Composite Structures2013; 99: 8–18.
12.
ZhuSChaiGB.Damage and failure mode maps of composite sandwich panel subjected to quasi-static indentation and low velocity impact. Composite Structures2013; 101: 204–214.
13.
ZhangTYanYLiJ, et al. Low-velocity impact of honeycomb sandwich composite plates. J Reinf Plast Compos2016; 35: 8–32.
14.
BaştürkSBTanoğluM.Mechanical and energy absorption behaviors of metal/polymer layered sandwich structures. J Reinf Plast Compos2011; 30: 1539–1547.
15.
LiuCZhangYXYeL.High velocity impact responses of sandwich panels with metal fibre laminate skins and aluminium foam core. Int J Impact Eng2017; 100: 139–153.
16.
AktayLJohnsonAFKröplinB-H.Numerical modelling of honeycomb core crush behaviour. Eng Fract Mech2008; 75: 2616–2630.
17.
ZhuFLuGRuanD, et al. Plastic deformation, failure and energy absorption of sandwich structures with metallic cellular cores. Int J Prot Struct2010; 1: 507–541.
18.
ZhouGHillMHookhamN.Investigation of parameters governing the damage and energy absorption characteristics of honeycomb sandwich panels. J Sandwich Struct Mater2007; 9: 309–342.
19.
VlotAGunninkJW.Fibre metal laminates: an introduction. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 2001.
20.
ChaiGBManikandanP.Low velocity impact response of fibre-metal laminates – a review. Compos Struct2014; 107: 363–381.
BalıkoğluFDemircioğluTKİnalO, et al. Compression after low velocity impact tests of marine sandwich composites: effect of intermediate wooden layers. Compos Struct2018; 183: 636–642.
23.
MamalisAGSpentzasKNPantelelisNG, et al. A new hybrid concept for sandwich structures. Compos Struct2008; 83: 335–340.
24.
ASTM D6264/D6264M − 12. Test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fiber-reinforced polymer-matrix composite to a concentrated quasi-static indentation force. West Conshohocken, PA:ASTM International.
25.
Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp. Abaqus Analysis User’s Guide, Version 2016. Providence, RI, USA, http://abaqus.software.polimi.it/v2016/ (accessed 1 February 2019).
26.
LopesCSCamanhoPPGürdalZ, et al. Low-velocity impact damage on dispersed stacking sequence laminates. Part II: Numerical simulations. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 937–947.
27.
LiuLMengPWangH, et al. The flatwise compressive properties of nomex honeycomb core with debonding imperfections in the double cell wall. Composites Part B2015; 76: 122–132.
28.
KhanSS. Low cycle lifetime assessment of Al2024 alloys. Report, Von der Fakultät Maschinenbau der Technischen Universität Dortmund, 2012.
29.
GonzálezEVMaimíPCamanhoPP, et al. Simulation of drop-weight impact and compression after impact tests on composite laminates. Compos Struct2012;94: 3364–3378.
30.
Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp. [QA9176e] how much hourglass energy is acceptable?. Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., 2017, https://onesearch.3ds.com (accessed 15 February 2021).
JohnsonAF.Modelling fabric reinforced composites under impact loads. Composites Part A2001; 32: 1197–1206.
33.
ManikandanPChaiGB.A layer-wise behavioral study of metal based interply hybrid composites under low velocity impact load. Compos Struct2014; 117: 17–31.
34.
SchwabMPettermannHE.Modelling and simulation of damage and failure in large composite components subjected to impact loads. Compos Struct2016; 158: 208–216.
35.
SchwabMTodtMWolfahrtM, et al. Failure mechanism based modelling of impact on fabric reinforced composite laminates based on shell elements. Compos Sci Technol2016; 128: 131–137.
GibsonLJAshbyMF.Cellular solids: structure and properties. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
41.
BitzerTN.Honeycomb technology: materials, design, manufacturing, applications and testing. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media, 1997.
42.
LiuLWangHGuanZ.Experimental and numerical study on the mechanical response of nomex honeycomb core under transverse loading. Compos Struct2015; 121: 304–314.
43.
RoyRParkS-JKweonJ-H, et al. Characterization of nomex honeycomb core constituent material mechanical properties. Compos Struct2014; 117: 255–266.
44.
GiglioMManesAGilioliA.Investigations on sandwich core properties through an experimental–numerical approach. Composites Part B2012; 43: 361–374.
45.
AbrateS.Impact on composite structures. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
46.
GonzálezEVMaimíPCamanhoPP, et al. Effects of ply clustering in laminated composite plates under low-velocity impact loading. Compos Sci Technol 2011; 71: 805–817.
