The effects of yield stress of poplar (Poplar × euramericana cv. ‘Neva’) on temperature (60–210°C), moisture content (oven dry-30%) and grain response mechanism and as well as its role in the formation of sandwich compressed wood were studied in this paper. The results showed that the yield stress of wood was significantly affected by moisture content(MC), temperature and their interaction. Compared with temperature, the relative change rate of yield stress was nearly 10 times higher for each 1% increase in MC than for each 1°C increase in temperature. The experimental data revealed that the relative change rate of yield stress depended on the softening effect of wood by moisture and temperature. The asymmetry of yield stress in different grain direction also depended on wood hydrothermal softening effect. Raising the temperature or increasing the MC could make wood radial vs tangential asymmetry decrease and radial vs radial tangential asymmetry disappear. In the process of hydrothermal compression, the yield stress gradient caused by the hydrothermal softening inside the wood was the main reason for the formation of sandwich compressed wood, and provided a scientific basis for the controllability of the position and thickness of the compressed layer(s).
LabansEKalninsKBisagniC.Flexural behavior of sandwich panels with cellular wood, plywood stiffener/foam and thermoplastic composite core. J Sandwich Struct Mater2019; 21: 784–805.
2.
ToubiaEAEmamiSKlostermanD.Degradation mechanisms of balsa wood and PVC foam sandwich core composites due to freeze/thaw exposure in saline solution. J Sandwich Struct Mater2019; 21: 990–1008.
3.
Estrada-MartínezSMollónVBonhommeJ.Proposals to improve the durability assessment after ageing tests for wood-based sandwich panels. J Sandwich Struct Mater2017; 19: 216–230.
4.
BachMRChalivendraVBAlvesC, et al. Mechanical characterization of natural biodegradable sandwich materials. J Sandwich Struct Mater2017; 19: 482–496.
5.
HuangRFWangYWZhaoYK, et al. Sandwich compression of wood by hygro-thermal control. Mokuzai Gakkaishi2012; 58: 84–89 (in Japanese).
6.
LiRGaoZQFengSH, et al. Effects of preheating temperatures on the formation of sandwich compression and density distribution in the compressed wood. J Wood Sci2018; 64: 751–757.
7.
GaoZQHuangRFChangJM, et al. Sandwich compression of wood: effects of preheating time and moisture distribution on the formation of compressed layer(s). Eur J Wood Prod2019; 77: 219–227.
8.
GaoZQHuangRFChangJM, et al. Effects of pressurized superheated-steam heat treatment on set recovery and mechanical properties of surface-compressed wood. Bioresources2019; 14: 1718–1730.
9.
GaoZQHuangRFLuJX, et al. Sandwich compression of wood: control of creating gradient on lumber thickness and properties of compressed wood. Wood Sci Technol2016; 50: 833–844.
10.
WuYMQinLHuangRF, et al. Effects of preheating temperature, preheating time and their interaction on the sandwich structure formation and density profile of sandwich compressed wood. J Wood Sci2019; 65: 11.
11.
FurutaYNakajimaMNakaniiE, et al. The effects of lignin and hemicelluloses on thermal-softening properties of water-swollen wood. Mokuzai Gakkaishi2010; 56: 132–138 (in Japanese).
12.
SalménLBurgertI.Cell wall features with regard to mechanical performance. A review. COST action E35 2004–2008: wood machining – micromechanics and fracture. Holzforschung2009; 63: 121–129.
13.
StevanicJSSalménL.Orientation of the wood polymers in the cell wall of spruce wood fibres. Holzforschung2009; 63: 497–503.
14.
SalménLStevanicJSOlssonAM.Contribution of lignin to the strength properties in wood fibres studied by dynamic FTIR spectroscopy and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). Holzforschung2016; 70: 1155–1163.
15.
SunLPCuiYZLiuYX.Analysis on loading differences between radial and tangential during compression process of wood in transverse direction. Forest Sci Technol1997; 3: 38–41.
16.
ÖstbergGSalménLTerleckiJ.Softening temperature of moist wood measured by differential calorimetry. Holzforschung1990; 44: 223–225.
LiJ.Analysis on the bending mechanism and influencing factors of solid wood bending. China Forest Sci Technol1998; 6: 16–18.
19.
PlacetVCisseOBoubakarML.Influence of environmental relative humidity on the tensile and rotational behavior of hemp fibres. J Mater Sci2012; 47: 3435–3446.
20.
OlssonASalménL. Viscoelasticity of in situ lignin as affected by structure. In: ACS symposium Series No. 489, 1992, p.133. USA: American Chemical Society.
21.
HuntDG.Creep trajectories for beech during moisture changes under load. J Mater Sci1984; 19: 1456–1467.
22.
HanhijärviA.Advances in the knowledge of the influence of moisture changes on the long-term mechanical performance of timber structures. Mat Struct2000; 33: 43–49.
23.
KamkeFAKutnarA.Transverse compression behavior of wood in saturated steam at 150 to 170°C. Wood Fiber Sci2010; 42: 1–11.
24.
UhmeierAMorookaTNorimotoM.Influence of thermal softening and degradation on the radial compression behavior of wet spruce. Holzforschung1998; 52: 77–81.
25.
TabarsaTChuiYH.Stress-strain response of wood under radial compression: part I. Test method and influences of cellular properties. Wood Fiber Sci2000; 32: 144–152.
26.
ReitererAStanzl-TscheggSE.Compressive behaviour of softwood under uniaxial loading at different orientations to the grain. Mech Mater2001; 33: 705–715.
27.
EllisSSteinerP.The behaviour of five wood species in compression. IAWA J2002; 23: 201–211.
28.
KärenlampiPPTynjäläPStrömP.Effect of temperature and compression on the mechanical behavior of steam-treated wood. J Wood Sci2003; 49: 298–304.
29.
WangJYCooperPA.Effect of grain orientation and surface wetting on vertical density profiles of thermally compressed fir and spruce. Holz Roh Werkst2005; 63: 397–402.
30.
NairnJA.Numerical simulations of transverse compression and densification in wood. Wood and fiber science. J Soc Wood Sci Technol2006; 38: 122–139.
31.
PlacetVPassardJPerréP.Viscoelastic properties of green wood across the grain measured by harmonic tests in the range 0–95°C: hardwood vs. softwood and normal wood vs. reaction wood. Holzforschung2007; 61: 548–557.
32.
ZhongWZHuangXCHaoZM, et al. Energy absorption of spruce wood under three kinds of quasi-static compression conditions. Adv Mater Res2011; 250–253: 3–9.
33.
WuYMHuangRFGaoZQ, et al. Research development of influencing factors of stress-strain relationship under wood transverse compression. China Forest Products Ind2018; 45: 11–16.
34.
GongMLamasonCLiL.Interactive effect of surface densification and post–heat–treatment on aspen wood. J Mater Process Tech2010; 210: 293–296.
35.
RautkariLLaineKLaflinN, et al. Surface modification of scots pine: the effect of process parameters on the through thickness density profile. J Mater Sci2011; 46: 4780–4786.
36.
OzyharTHeringSNiemzP.Moisture-dependent orthotropic tensioncompression asymmetry of wood. Holzforschung2013; 67: 395–404.
37.
PeresMLDDelucisRDÁGattoDA, et al. Mechanical behavior of wood species softened by microwave heating prior to bending. Eur J Wood Prod2016; 74: 143–149.
38.
CaiZY.A new method of determining moisture gradient in wood. For Prod J2008; 58: 41–45.
39.
Takahashi A and Nakayama Y.Wood science series 3: physics. Ootu: Kaisei, 1995, pp.36–37.
40.
BaoFCLuJX.A study on fluid permeability of important Chinese wood. Sci Silvae Sin1992; 28: 237–245.
41.
WolcottMPShutlerEL.Temperature and moisture influence on compression recover behavior of wood. Wood Fiber Sci2003; 35: 540–551.
42.
AlenRKotilainenRZamanA.Thermochemical behavior of Norway spruce (Picea abies) at 180–225°C. Wood Sci Tech2002; 36: 163–171.
43.
JiangJLLuJXHuangRF, et al. Effects of time and temperature on the viscoelastic properties of Chinese fir wood. Drying Technol2009; 27: 1229–1234.
44.
WinandyJEKrzysikAM.Thermal degradation of wood fibers during hot-pressing of MDF composites: part I. Relative effects and benefits of thermal exposure. Wood Fiber Sci2007; 39: 450–461.
45.
SalménLLarssonPA.On the origin of sorption hysteresis in cellulosic materials. Carbohydr Polym2018; 182: 15–20.
46.
MouteeMFortinYLaghdirA, et al. Cantilever experimental setup for rheological parameter identification in relation to wood drying. Wood Sci Technol2010; 44: 31–49.
47.
ZhanTYJiangJLLuJX, et al. Influence of hygrothermal condition on dynamic viscoelasticity of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata). part 1: moisture adsorption. Holzforschung2018; 72: 567–578.
