In recent years, concerns about environmental pollution have led to the development of natural fiber sandwich structures as alternatives to petroleum-based ones. This paper reviews various studies on sandwich structures composed of non-wood cellulose-nature fibers. These fibers mainly include flax, hemp, jute, kenaf, sisal, coir, and bamboo. The studies are classified based on the type of fibers, the components in which they are used, and experimental tests/numerical investigations. Furthermore, a few suggestions for future research in the field of eco-friendly sandwich structures are made.
PlocherJPanesarA. Review on design and structural optimisation in additive manufacturing: towards next-generation lightweight structures. Mater Des2019; 183: 108164.
2.
CastaniéBBouvetCGinotM. Review of composite sandwich structure in aeronautic applications. Compos Part C: Open Access2020; 1: 100004.
3.
BirmanVKardomateasGA. Review of current trends in research and applications of sandwich structures. Compos Part B: Eng2018; 142: 221–240.
4.
SayyadASGhugalYM. Bending, buckling and free vibration of laminated composite and sandwich beams: a critical review of literature. Compos Structures2017; 171: 486–504.
5.
CaliriJrFerreiraAJMTitaFerreiraV, et al.A review on plate and shell theories for laminated and sandwich structures highlighting the finite element method. Compos Structures2016; 156: 63–77.
6.
KhanTAcarVAydinMR, et al.A review on recent advances in sandwich structures based on polyurethane foam cores. Polymer Compos2020; 41: 2355–2400.
7.
ZaidNZMRejabMRMMohamedNAN. Sandwich structure based on corrugated-core: a review. In: MATEC web of conferences, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia, 2016. EDP Sciences, 74, p. 00029.
8.
PuttegowdaMRangappaSMJawaidM, et al.Potential of natural/synthetic hybrid composites for aerospace applications. In: Sustainable composites for aerospace applications. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2018, pp. 315–351.
9.
PickeringK (ed). Properties and performance of natural-fibre composites. Cambridge, England: Elsevier, 2008.
10.
BledzkiAJochenG. Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog Polymer Science1999; 24(2): 221–274.
YuHNKimSSHwangUk. Application of natural fiber reinforced composites to trenchless rehabilitation of underground pipes. Compos Struct2008; 86(1–3): 285–290.
13.
KaliaSDufresneAMathewCB, et al.Cellulose-based bio-and nanocomposites: a review. Int J Polymer Science2011.
14.
HolberyJHoustonD. Natural-fiber-reinforced polymer composites in automotive applications. Jom2006; 58(11): 80–86.
15.
DittenberDBGangaRaoHVS. Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure. Compos Part A: Applied Science Manufacturing2012; 43(8): 1419–1429.
16.
VinsonJR. The behavior of sandwich structures of isotropic and composite materials. Boca Raton: Routledge, 1999.
17.
YangJGuDLinK, et al.Optimization of bio-inspired bi-directionally corrugated panel impact-resistance structures: Numerical simulation and selective laser melting process. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2019; 91: 59–67.
18.
WuYLiuQFuJ, et al.Dynamic crash responses of bio-inspired aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures with CFRP panels. Compos Part B: Eng2017; 121: 122–133.
19.
BragagnoloGCrocombeADOginSL, et al.Investigation of skin-core debonding in sandwich structures with foam cores. Mater Des2020; 186: 108312.
20.
ChenDJingLYangF. Optimal design of sandwich panels with layered-gradient aluminum foam cores under air-blast loading. Compos Part B: Eng2019; 166: 169–186.
21.
MouritzAP. Review of z-pinned laminates and sandwich composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2020; 139: 106128.
22.
RongYLiuJLuoW, et al.Effects of geometric configurations of corrugated cores on the local impact and planar compression of sandwich panels. Compos Part B: Eng2018; 152: 324–335.
23.
RejabMRMCantwellWJ. The mechanical behaviour of corrugated-core sandwich panels. Compos Part B: Eng2013; 47: 267–277.
24.
YangWXiongJFengL-J, et al.Fabrication and mechanical properties of three-dimensional enhanced lattice truss sandwich structures. J Sandwich Structures Mater2020; 22(5): 1594–1611.
25.
MonteiroJGSardinhaMAlvesF, et al.Evaluation of the effect of core lattice topology on the properties of sandwich panels produced by additive manufacturing. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L: J Mater Des Appl2020; 235: 1464420720958015.
26.
HaghparastEGhorbanpour-AraniAAraniAG. Effect of fluid–structure interaction on vibration of moving sandwich plate with balsa wood core and nanocomposite face sheets. Int J Appl Mech2020; 12(07): 2050078.
27.
TranVanLLegrandVCasariP, et al.Hygro-thermo-mechanical responses of balsa wood core sandwich composite beam exposed to fire. Processes2020; 8: 103–111.
28.
SargianisJKimHISuhrJ. Natural cork agglomerate employed as an environmentally friendly solution for quiet sandwich composites. Scientific Reports2012; 2(1): 403–406.
29.
ReisLSilvaA. Mechanical behavior of sandwich structures using natural cork agglomerates as core materials. J Sandwich Structures Mater2009; 11(6): 487–500.
30.
KumarAPandaS. Optimal damping in circular cylindrical sandwich shells with a three-layered viscoelastic composite core. J Vibration Acoust2017; 139: 6.
31.
Alavi NiaARanjbarzadehHKazemiM. An empirical study on ballistic resistance of sandwich targets with aluminum facesheets and composite core. Latin Am J Sol Structures2017; 14(6): 1085–1105.
32.
JohnMThomasS. Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydr Polymers2008; 713: 343–364.
33.
MethacanonPWeerawatsophonUSumransinN, et al.Properties and potential application of the selected natural fibers as limited life geotextiles. Carbohydr Polym2010; 82(4): 1090–1096.
34.
BegMDHPickeringKLPickeringKL. Accelerated weathering of unbleached and bleached Kraft wood fibre reinforced polypropylene composites. Polym Degrad Stab2008; 93(10): 1939–1946.
35.
SuardanaNPGKuMSLimKuJK, et al.Effects of diammonium phosphate on the flammability and mechanical properties of bio-composites. Mater Des2011; 32(4): 1990–1999.
36.
AkilHMlOmarMFMazukiAAM, et al.Kenaf fiber reinforced composites: a review. Mater Des2011; 32(8–9): 4107–4121.
37.
AzeezMAJoshuaIO. Bamboo, its chemical modification and products. Bamboo-Current and Future Prospects2018.
38.
AhmadFChoiHSParkMK. A review: natural fiber composites selection in view of mechanical, light weight, and economic properties. Macromolecular Materials Engineering2015; 3001: 10–24.
39.
RameshM. Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) fibre reinforced polymer composite materials: a review on preparation, properties and prospects. Prog Mater Sci2019; 102: 109–166.
40.
YanLChouwNJayaramanK. Flax fibre and its composites - a review. Compos Part B: Eng2014; 56: 296–317.
41.
MakKFamAMacDougallC. Flexural behavior of sandwich panels with bio-FRP skins made of flax fibers and epoxidized pine-oil resin. J Compos Construction2015; 19(6): 04015005.
42.
CoDyreLMakKFamA. Flexural and axial behaviour of sandwich panels with bio-based flax fibre-reinforced polymer skins and various foam core densities. J Sandwich Structures Mater2018; 20(5): 595–616.
43.
CoDyreLFamA. Axial strength of sandwich panels of different lengths with natural flax-fiber composite skins and different foam-core densities. J Compos Construction2017; 21(5): 04017042.
44.
TeoSCLanDNULeng TehP, et al.Mechanical behavior of palm oil–based composite foam and its sandwich structure with a flax–epoxy composite. J Appl Polym Sci2016; 133: 45.
45.
BettsDSadeghianPFamA. Experimental behavior and design-oriented analysis of sandwich beams with bio-based composite facings and foam cores. J Compos Construction2018; 22(4): 04018020.
46.
BettsDJSadeghianPFamA. Residual behavior of sandwich panels with flax FRP faces and foam cores after an impact event. In: Structures congress 2019: blast, impact loading, and research and education. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2019, pp. 22–30.
47.
BettsDSadeghianPFamA. Experiments and nonlinear analysis of the impact behaviour of sandwich panels constructed with flax fibre-reinforced polymer faces and foam cores. J Sandwich Struct Mater2020; 23: 1099636220925073.
48.
MakKFamA. Performance of flax-FRP sandwich panels exposed to different ambient temperatures. Construction Building Mater2019; 219: 121–130.
49.
ManobalaKSPrabhakaranSRamji GauthamDR, et al.Investigation of mechanical and thermal behaviour of natural sandwich composite materials for partition walls. Int J Res Rev; 7(5): 211–216.
50.
JiangQChenGKumarA, et al.Sustainable sandwich composites manufactured from recycled carbon fibers, flax fibers/PP skins, and recycled PET core. J Compos Sci2021; 5(1): 2.
51.
VenkatachalamGMehtaNShuklaS, et al.Experimental investigations on flexural and fracture behaviors of flax fiber reinforced sandwich panels, 2018.
52.
FuYSadeghianP. Flexural and shear characteristics of bio-based sandwich beams made of hollow and foam-filled paper honeycomb cores and flax fiber composite skins. Thin-Walled Structures2020; 153: 106834.
53.
AzzouzLChenYZarrelliM, et al.Mechanical properties of 3-D printed truss-like lattice biopolymer non-stochastic structures for sandwich panels with natural fibre composite skins. Compos Structures2019; 213: 220–230.
54.
GelbrichSPetzoldtCGliniorzR, et al.Interactive sandwich facade made of renewable resources. In: MATEC web of conferences, Opole, Poland, 2018. EDP Sciences, 174, p. 01026.
55.
McCrackenASadeghianP. Corrugated cardboard core sandwich beams with bio-based flax fiber composite skins. J Building Eng2018; 20: 114–122.
56.
BettsDSadeghianPFamA. Impact behavior of sustainable sandwich panels with flax FRP faces and cardboard cores. In: AEI 2019: integrated building solutions—the National agenda. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2019, pp. 80–85.
57.
BettsDSadeghianPFamA. Structural behavior of sandwich beams with flax fiber–reinforced polymer faces and cardboard cores under monotonic and impact loads. J Architectural Eng2020; 26(2).
58.
HotoRFurundarenaGTorresJP, et al.Flexural behavior and water absorption of asymmetrical sandwich composites from natural fibers and cork agglomerate core. Mater Lett2014; 127: 48–52.
59.
La RosaADReccaAGaglianoA, et al.Environmental impacts and thermal insulation performance of innovative composite solutions for building applications. Construction Building Mater2014; 55: 406–414.
60.
ColominaSBoronatTFenollarO, et al.High renewable content sandwich structures based on flax-basalt hybrids and biobased epoxy polymers. In: AIP conference proceedings, Nuremberg, Germany, 2014. American Institute of Physics, 1593(1): 467–470.
61.
MancusoAPitarresiGTuminoD. Mechanical behaviour of a green sandwich made of flax reinforced polymer facings and cork core. Proced Eng2015; 109(2): 144–153.
62.
SarasiniFTirillòJLampaniL, et al.Dynamic response of green sandwich structures. Proced Engineering2016; 167: 237–244.
63.
FernandesFAOTavaresJPAlves de SousaRJ, et al.Manufacturing and testing composites based on natural materials. Proced Manufacturing2017; 13: 227–234.
64.
SadeghianPHristozovDWroblewskiL. Experimental and analytical behavior of sandwich composite beams: comparison of natural and synthetic materials. J Sandwich Struct Mater2018; 20(3): 287–307.
65.
BoriaSRaponiESarasiniF, et al.Green sandwich structures under impact: experimental vs numerical analysis. Proced Struct Integrity2018; 12: 317–329.
66.
SarasiniFTirillòJLampaniL, et al.Impact behavior of sandwich structures made of flax/epoxy face sheets and agglomerated cork. J Nat Fibers2018; 17(2): 168–188.
67.
SarasiniFTirillòJLampaniL, et al.Static and dynamic characterization of agglomerated cork and related sandwich structures. Compos Struct2019; 212: 439–451.
68.
PrabhakaranSKrishnarajVSharmaS, et al.Experimental study on thermal and morphological analyses of green composite sandwich made of flax and agglomerated cork. J Therm Anal Calorim2020; 139(5): 3003–3012.
69.
PrabhakaranSKrishnarajVShankarK, et al.Experimental investigation on impact, sound, and vibration response of natural-based composite sandwich made of flax and agglomerated cork. J Compos Mater2020; 54(5): 669–680.
70.
PhillipsSLessardL. Application of natural fiber composites to musical instrument top plates. J Compos Materials2012; 46(2): 145–154.
71.
Le DuigouADeuxJ-MDaviesP, et al.PLLA/flax mat/balsa bio-sandwich manufacture and mechanical properties. Appl Compos Mater2011; 18(5): 421–438.
72.
Le DuigouADeuxJ-MDaviesP, et al.PLLA/flax mat/balsa bio-sandwich—environmental impact and simplified life cycle analysis. Appl Compos Materials2012; 19(3–4): 363–378.
73.
KandareELuangtriratanaPKandolaBK. Fire reaction properties of flax/epoxy laminates and their balsa-core sandwich composites with or without fire protection. Compos Part B: Eng2014; 56: 602–610.
74.
CastegnaroSGomieroCBattistiC, et al.A bio-composite racing sailboat: Materials selection, design, manufacturing and sailing. Ocean Eng2017; 133: 142–150.
75.
MontiAEl MahiAJendliZ, et al.Experimental and finite elements analysis of the vibration behaviour of a bio-based composite sandwich beam. Compos Part B: Eng2017; 110: 466–475.
76.
MontiAEL MahiAJendliZ, et al.Quasi-static and fatigue properties of a balsa cored sandwich structure with thermoplastic skins reinforced by flax fibres. J Sandwich Struct Mater2019; 21(7): 2358–2381.
77.
ZhangJShenYJiangB, et al.Sound absorption characterization of natural materials and sandwich structure composites. Aerosp2018; 5(3): 75.
78.
SusainathanJEymaFDe LuyckerE, et al.Manufacturing and quasi-static bending behavior of wood-based sandwich structures. Compos Struct2017; 182: 487–504.
79.
SusainathanJEymaFDe LuyckerE, et al.Experimental investigation of impact behavior of wood-based sandwich structures. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2018; 109: 10–19.
80.
SusainathanJEymaFDe LuyckerE, et al.Numerical modeling of impact on wood-based sandwich structures. Mech Adv Mater Struct2020; 27(18): 1583–1598.
81.
BagheriZSEl SawiISchemitschEH, et al.Biomechanical properties of an advanced new carbon/flax/epoxy composite material for bone plate applications. J Mechanical Behavior Biomedical Materials2013; 20: 398–406.
82.
ManteghiSMahboobZFawazZ, et al.Investigation of the mechanical properties and failure modes of hybrid natural fiber composites for potential bone fracture fixation plates. J Mechanical Behavior Biomedical Materials2017; 65: 306–316.
83.
PetroneGRaoSDe RosaS, et al.Initial experimental investigations on natural fibre reinforced honeycomb core panels. Compos Part B: Eng2013; 55: 400–406.
84.
ZuhriMYMGuanZWCantwellWJ. The mechanical properties of natural fibre based honeycomb core materials. Compos Part B: Eng2014; 58: 1–9.
85.
XuJGaoXZhangC, et al.Flax fiber-reinforced composite lattice cores: a low-cost and recyclable approach. Mater Des2017; 133: 444–454.
86.
YinSChenHWuY, et al.Introducing composite lattice core sandwich structure as an alternative proposal for engine hood. Compos Struct2018; 201: 131–140.
87.
RiccioARaimondoASaputoS, et al.A numerical study on the impact behaviour of natural fibres made honeycomb cores. Compos Struct2018; 202: 909–916.
88.
SarwarAMahboobZZderoR, et al.Mechanical characterization of a new Kevlar/Flax/epoxy hybrid composite in a sandwich structure. Polym Test2020; 90: 106680.
89.
AlsubariSZuhriMYMSapuanSM, et al.Quasi-static compression behaviour of interlocking core structures made of flax fibre reinforced polylactic acid composite. J Mater Res Technol2020; 9(6): 12065–12070.
90.
SelmiSHabibiMLaperrièreL, et al.Characterisation of natural flax fibers honeycomb: compression damage analysis using acoustic emission. J Nat Fibers2020; 1–10.
91.
EssassiK.RebiereJ.El MahiA., et al. Vibration behaviour of a bio-composite sandwich with auxetic core. In: MATEC web of conferences, Le Mans, France, 29–31 October 2018, vol. 283. EDP Sciences, 2019.
92.
EssassiKRebiereJ-LEl MahiA, et al.Dynamic characterization of a bio-based sandwich with auxetic core: experimental and numerical study. Int J Appl Mech2019; 11(02): 1950016.
93.
EssassiKRebiereJ-LEL MahiA, et al.Experimental and numerical analysis of the dynamic behavior of a bio-based sandwich with an auxetic core. J Sandwich Struct Mater2019; 23: 1099636219851547.
94.
EssassiKRebiereJ-lEl MahiA, et al.Experimental and analytical investigation of the bending behaviour of 3D-printed bio-based sandwich structures composites with auxetic core under cyclic fatigue tests. Compo Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2020; 131: 105775.
95.
EssassiKRebiereJ-LEl MahiA, et al.Investigation of the static behavior and failure mechanisms of a 3D printed bio-based sandwich with auxetic core. Int J Appl Mech2020; 12(05): 2050051.
96.
LachaudFBoutinMEspinosaC, et al.Failure prediction of a new sandwich panels based on flax fibres reinforced epoxy bio-composites. Compos Structures; 257(2021): 113361.
97.
ShahzadA. Hemp fiber and its composites–a review. J Compos Mater2012; 46(8): 973–986.
98.
MutjéPGironèsJLòpezA, et al.Hemp strands: PP composites by injection molding: effect of low cost physico-chemical treatments. J Reinforced Plastics Compos2006; 25(3): 313–327.
99.
MehtaGDrzalLTMohantyAK, et al.Effect of fiber surface treatment on the properties of biocomposites from nonwoven industrial hemp fiber mats and unsaturated polyester resin. J Applied Polymer Science2006; 99(3): 1055–1068.
100.
HuRLimJ-K. Fabrication and mechanical properties of completely biodegradable hemp fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites. J Compos Mater2007; 41(13): 1655–1669.
101.
TanasăFZănoagăMTeacăC‐A, et al.Modified hemp fibers intended for fiber‐reinforced polymer composites used in structural applications—A review. I. Methods of modification. Polym Compos2020; 41(1): 5–31.
102.
KumarNSinghTGrewalJS, et al.Experimental investigation on the physical, mechanical and tribological properties of hemp fiber-based non-asbestos organic brake friction composites. Mater Res Express2019; 6(8): 085710.
103.
CriniGLichtfouseEChanetG, et al.Traditional and new applications of hemp. In: Sustainable agriculture reviews 42. Cham: Springer, 2020, pp. 37–87.
104.
MechraouiARiedlBRodrigueD. Mechanical properties of polypropylene structural foams with fiber-reinforced skins. J Cellular Plastics2011; 47(2): 115–132.
105.
Scutarumlbabamtimarj. Flexural rigidity evaluation of composite sandwich panel of carbon-hemp, 2013.
106.
La RosaADReccaGSummerscalesJ, et al.Bio-based versus traditional polymer composites. A life cycle assessment perspective. J Cleaner Production2014; 74: 135–144.
107.
ChanKEYongLAKoY-F, et al.Experimental and numerical studies of sustainable sandwich bio-composites derived from plant-based resources. J Sandwich Struct Mater2017; 19(2): 192–215.
108.
KavianiboroujeniACloutierARodrigueD. Mechanical characterization of asymmetric high density polyethylene/hemp composite sandwich panels with and without a foam core. J Sandwich Struct Mater2015; 17(6): 748–765.
109.
KavianiboroujeniACloutierARodrigueD. Low velocity impact behaviour of asymmetric three-layer sandwich composite structures with and without foam core. Polym Polym Compos2017; 25(5): 381–394.
110.
FajrinJYanZFrankB, et al.Hybrid sandwich panel with natural fibre composite intermediate layer: manufacturing process and significance analysis. Malaysian J Civil Eng2013; 25(Special issue 1): 95–111.
111.
BoccarussoLDuranteMLangellaA. Lightweight hemp/bio-epoxy grid structure manufactured by a new continuous process. Compos Part B: Eng2018; 146: 165–175.
112.
KabirMMWangHLauKT, et al.Mechanical properties of chemically-treated hemp fibre reinforced sandwich composites. Compos Part B: Eng2012; 43(2): 159–169.
113.
AntonySCherouatAMontayG. Hemp fibre woven fabrics/polypropylene based honeycomb sandwich structure for aerospace applications. Adv Aircraft Spacecraft Sci2019; 6: 087–092.
114.
SelingerJWimmerR. A novel low-density sandwich panel made from hemp. In: InWood2015: innovations in wood materials and processes, 2015, p. 93.
115.
ManoJC. Effects of bio-composites in corrugated sandwich panels under edgewise compression loading, 2019.
116.
DragonettiRNapolitanoMBoccarussoL, et al.A study on the sound transmission loss of a new lightweight hemp/bio-epoxy sandwich structure. Appl Acoust2020; 167: 107379.
117.
AntonySAbelCMontayG. Fabrication and characterization of hemp fibre based 3D printed honeycomb sandwich structure by FDM process. Appl Compos Mater2020; 27: 1–19.
118.
GoriparthiBKSumanKNSMohan RaoN. Effect of fiber surface treatments on mechanical and abrasive wear performance of polylactide/jute composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2012; 43(10): 1800–1808.
119.
GuptaMKSrivastavaRKBisariaH. Potential of jute fibre reinforced polymer composites: a review. Int J Fiber Textile Res2015; 5(3): 30–38.
120.
GognaEKumarRAnuragAK, et al.A comprehensive review on jute fiber reinforced composites. In: Advances in industrial and production engineering. Singapore: Springer, 2019, pp. 459–467.
121.
RathoreAPradhanMK. Hybrid cellulose bionanocomposites from banana and jute fibre: a review of preparation, properties and applications. Mater Today Proc2017; 4(2): 3942–3951.
122.
ChandekarHChaudhariVWaigaonkarS. A review of jute fiber reinforced polymer composites. Mater Today Proc2020.
123.
ChengTCNanyanNAbUy LanDN, et al.Effect of reinforced hybrid palm shells on mechanical properties of polyurethane-jute woven/vinyl ester sandwich board. Malaysian J Anal Sci2014; 18(3): 651–659.
124.
ChengTSUy LanDNLengTP, et al.Falling weight impact properties of palm shell reinforced palm oil‐based polyurethane bio‐composite sandwich. Macromolecular Symposia2017; 371(1): 50–57.
125.
NiedermannPSzebényiGToldyA. Characterization of high glass transition temperature sugar-based epoxy resin composites with jute and carbon fibre reinforcement. Compos Sci Technol2015; 117: 62–68.
126.
KaradumanYOnalLFlexural behavior of commingled jute/polypropylene nonwoven fabric reinforced sandwich composites. Compos Part B: Eng2016; 93: 12–25.
127.
MatalkahFBharadwajHSoroushianP, et al.Development of sandwich composites for building construction with locally available materials. Construction Building Materials2017; 147: 380–387.
128.
MallaiahSKrishnaVSKrishnaM. Development and comparative studies of bio-based and synthetic fiber based sandwich structures. Int J Soft Compos Eng2012; 2: 332–335.
129.
VenkatachalamGReddyDMTiwariSK, et al.Fracture and flexural analysis of sandwich panel with polypropylene honeycomb as core and jute fabric reinforced epoxy matrix composite as skin layer. Mater Res Express2019; 6: 115348–115411.
130.
VenkatachalamGSuthenthiraveerappaVKant TiwariS, et al.Dynamic characteristics of a honeycomb sandwich beam made with jute/epoxy composite skin. Emerging Mater Res2020; 9(1): 132–140.
131.
ZhengZLiYYangW. Absorption properties of natural fiber-reinforced sandwich structures based on the fabric structures. J Reinforced Plastics Compos2013; 32(20): 1561–1568.
132.
ChenJ-CWuC-MHuangP-Y, et al.Mechanical properties of jute/pla sandwich composites with corrugated board as a core layer. In: 16th European conference on composite materials, Seville, Spain, 22–26 June 2014.
133.
ChenJ-C. Bending and impacting of sandwich composites with a corrugated paper core layer. Int J Mod Phys B2018; 32: 1840057–1840119.
134.
ChenJ-CLinY-T. Tension and compression of jute fabric/corrugated paper/reinforced polylactic acid resin sandwich composites. Mod Phys Lett B2019; 33: 14n151940003.
135.
ReisLGCarvalhoPAlvesC., et al. Mechanical behaviour of sandwich beams manufactured with glass or jute fiber in facings and cork agglomerates as core. In: Materials science forum. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2010, 636, pp. 245–252.
136.
HachemaneBZitouneRBezzaziB, et al.Sandwich composites impact and indentation behaviour study. Compos Part B: Eng2013; 51: 1–10.
137.
KaradumanY. Experimental investigation on the flexural and dynamic mechanical properties of jute fiber/cork-reinforced polyester sandwich composites. BioResources2018; 13(2): 3958–3970.
138.
FojtlLRusnákováSŽaludekM, et al.Manufacturing and mechanical characterization of bio-based laminates and sandwich structures. In: Materials Science Forum. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2017, 891, pp. 542–546.
139.
DoddamaniMRKulkarniSM. Behavior of sandwich beams with functionally graded rubber core in three point bending. Polym Compos2011; 32(10): 1541–1551.
140.
DoddamaniMRKulkarniSM. Instrumented ballistic performance of jute/epoxy sandwich with functionally graded rubber core. Int J Mater Eng Innovation2012; 3(2): 117–138.
141.
DoddamaniMRKulkarniSM. Compressive properties of sandwiches with functionally graded rubber core and jute-epoxy skins. Bull Mater Sci2013; 36(2): 319–328.
142.
BalcıoğluHE. Flexural behaviors of sandwich composites produced using recycled and natural material. Mugla J Sci Technol2018; 4(1): 64–73.
143.
BalcıoğluESakinR. Determination of mechanical properties of natural sandwich composites produced by using waste material. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi2019; 23(4): 569–582.
144.
RajoleSRavishankarKSKulkarniSM. Study on ballistic energy absorption capability of glass-epoxy and jute-epoxy-rubber sandwich composites. Mater Sci Forum2018; 928: 14–19.
145.
RajoleSRavishankarKSKulkarniSM. Performance study of jute-epoxy composites/sandwiches under normal ballistic impact. Defence Technology2020; 16(4): 947–955.
146.
ThitithanasarnSYamadaKIshiakuUS, et al.Jute fabric reinforced engineering thermoplastic sandwich composites. I. The effect of molding time. J Applied Polymer Science2013; 127(4): 2952–2959.
147.
HassaninAHHamoudaTCandanZ, et al.Developing high-performance hybrid green composites. Compos Part B: Eng2016; 92: 384–394.
148.
LiZWeiXGaoZ, et al.Manufacturing and mechanical characterisation of polyurethane resin based sandwich composites for three-dimensional fabric reinforcement. Mater Today Commun2020; 24: 101046.
149.
KamalRR. Experimental evaluation of the mechanical properties of a natural fiber reinforced sandwich structural panel. Long Beach: California State University, 2011.
150.
UgaleVSinghKMishraN, et al.Experimental studies on thin sandwich panels under impact and static loading. J Reinforced Plastics Compos2013; 32(6): 420–434.
151.
AnbusagarNRGiridharanPKPalanikumarK. Mechanical behavior of glass-jute sandwich nano polyester composites to flexural and impact loading. Eur J Scientific Res2012; 84(2): 148–155.
152.
AnbusagarNPalanikumarKJanaki RamuluP. Study of damage mechanism on OMT nanoclay polymer hybrid sandwich laminates. Mater Today Proc2019; 16: 262–267.
153.
AnbusagarN. Fabrication and vibration studies on OMT nano Polymer hybrid sandwich laminates. Mater Today Proc2019; 16: 268–276.
154.
Anbu SagarNRRPalanikumarK. Development and characterization of nano clay reinforced three-phase sandwich composite laminates. In: Nanoclay reinforced polymer composites. Singapore: Springer; 2016, pp. 357–391.
155.
PanditaSDYuanXMananMA, et al.Evaluation of jute/glass hybrid composite sandwich: water resistance, impact properties and life cycle assessment. J Reinforced Plastics Compos2014; 33(1): 14–25.
156.
LeeGHRohJULeeWI. Processing and flexural properties of chopped jute fiber reinforced PLA sandwich composites. Compos Res2014; 27(3): 96–102.
157.
StocchiAColabellaLCisilinoA, et al.Manufacturing and testing of a sandwich panel honeycomb core reinforced with natural-fiber fabrics. Mater Design2014; 55: 394–403.
158.
ZareeiNGeranmayehAEslami-FarsaniR. Interlaminar shear strength and tensile properties of environmentally-friendly fiber metal laminates reinforced by hybrid basalt and jute fibers. Polym Test2019; 75: 205–212.
159.
WangXShiX-lMengQ-k, et al.Bending behaviors of three grid sandwich structures with wood facing and jute fabrics/epoxy composites cores. Compos Struct2020; 252: 112666.
160.
HussainMImadASaouabA, et al.Properties and characterization of novel 3D jute reinforced natural fibre aluminium laminates. J Compos Mater2020; 55: 0021998320980044.
161.
UawongsuwanPOtaTYangY, et al.Mechanical properties of sandwich injection molded jute/glass fiber hybrid composites. J Solid Mech Mater Eng2011; 5(12): 945–955.
162.
ElbadryEAAly-HassanMSHamadaH. Mechanical properties and notch sensitivity of hybrid jute fiber mat/jute fabric/glass fabric sandwich composites
163.
VitaleJPFrancucciGXiongJ, et al.Failure mode maps of natural and synthetic fiber reinforced composite sandwich panels. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2017; 94: 217–225.
164.
LiSFengYWangM, et al.Mechanical behavior of natural fiber-based bi-directional corrugated lattice sandwich structure. Materials2018; 11: 2578–2612.
165.
LiSHuRChengJ, et al.Compressive effect of jute fiber corrugated lattice sandwich structure. J Reinforced Plastics Compos2020; 39(5–6): 209–218.
166.
LiSFengYQinJ, et al.Bending performance of a jute fiber and epoxy resin composite sandwich structure with a bi-directional corrugated truss core. Fibers Polym2019; 20(10): 2166–2174.
167.
DastanTSafianASheikhzadehM. The crashworthiness performance of integrally woven sandwich composite panels made using natural and glass fibers. J Compos Mater2020; 55: 0021998320964847.
168.
VitaleJPFrancucciGStocchiA. Thermal conductivity of sandwich panels made with synthetic and vegetable fiber vacuum-infused honeycomb cores. J Sandwich Structures Mater2017; 19(1): 66–82.
169.
MeintsPDSmithCA. Kenaf seed storage duration on germination, emergence, and yield. Ind Crops Prod2003; 17(1): 9–14.
170.
QatuMS. Application of kenaf-based natural fiber composites in the automotive industry. No. 2011-01-0215. SAE Technical Paper, 2011.
171.
RameshM. Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) fibre based bio-materials: a review on processing and properties. Prog Mater Sci2016; 78–79: 1–92.
172.
HamidonMHSultanMTHAriffinAH, et al.Effects of fibre treatment on mechanical properties of kenaf fibre reinforced composites: a review. J Mater Res Technology2019; 8(3): 3327–3337.
173.
GuoASunZSatyavoluJ. Impact of chemical treatment on the physiochemical and mechanical properties of kenaf fibers. Ind Crops Prod2019; 141: 111726.
174.
HaoAZhaoHChenJY. Kenaf/polypropylene nonwoven composites: The influence of manufacturing conditions on mechanical, thermal, and acoustical performance. Compos Part B: Eng2013; 54: 44–51.
175.
AzizMHalimZOthmanM. Effect of different concentration of sodium hydroxide [NaOH] on Kenaf sandwich structures. Mater Sci Eng2018; 290(1): 012080.
176.
AshrafWIshakMRZuhriMYM, et al.Investigation of mechanical properties of honeycomb sandwich structure with Kenaf/glass hybrid composite facesheet. J Nat Fibers2021; 3: 1–15.
177.
HalimZAbdul RahmanSK. Flexural properties of Kenaf sandwich panel. In: advanced materials research. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2012, 567, pp. 216–219.
178.
RahmanSKAHalimZ. Thermal analysis of kenaf sandwich core panel. In: Advanced materials research. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 576, 2012, pp. 488–491.
179.
OthmanMNBukhariMHalimZ, et al.Sandwich structure composites: effect of kenaf on mechanical properties. Int J Mater Metallurgical Eng2015; 9(1): 189–192.
180.
OsmanEWarikhARMYahayaSH, et al.Effects of different pre-treatments on the performance of kenaf fiber reinforced aluminum laminates sandwich composite. J Adv Manufacturing Technol (Jamt)2019; 13: 2.
181.
Zainol AbidinMHMohamadMAHZaidiAMA, et al.Experimental study on ballistic resistance of sandwich panel protection structure with kenaf foam as a core material against small arm bullet. In: Applied mechanics and materials. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2013, 315, pp. 612–615.
182.
SharbaMJLemanZSultanMTH, et al.Tensile and compressive properties of woven kenaf/glass sandwich hybrid composites. Int J Polym Sci2016; 2016: 1235048.
183.
FengNLDharMalingamSZakariaKA, et al.Investigation on the fatigue life characteristic of kenaf/glass woven-ply reinforced metal sandwich materials. J Sandwich Structures Mater2019; 21(7): 2440–2455.
184.
Dhar MalingamSJumaatFANgLF, et al.Tensile and impact properties of cost-effective hybrid fiber metal laminate sandwich structures. Adv Polymer Technol2018; 37(7): 2385–2393.
185.
MalingamSDFengNLKhoonaLC, et al.The influences of fibre parameters on the tensile and flexural response of lightweight thermoplastic kenaf fibre reinforced metal composites. J Nat Fibers2018; 17: 966–978.
186.
SallihNLescherPBhattacharyyaD. Flatwise compressive properties of kenaf/polypropylene honeycomb Core. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, Batu Ferringhi, Penang, Malaysia, 21–22 November 2017. Institute of Physics Publishing, 370(1).
187.
BakhoriSHassanMZDaudY, et al.Mechanical behavior of Kenaf/Epoxy corrugated sandwich structures. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia, 18–19 August 2015; 100(1): 012011.
188.
MishraSMohantyAKDrzalLT, et al.A review on pineapple leaf fibers, sisal fibers and their biocomposites. Macromolecular Mater Eng2004; 28911: 955–974.
189.
GuptaMKSrivastavaRK. Properties of sisal fibre reinforced epoxy composite, 2016.
190.
ZhaoXLiRKYBaiS-L. Mechanical properties of sisal fiber reinforced high density polyethylene composites: effect of fiber content, interfacial compatibilization, and manufacturing process. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2014; 65: 169–174.
LiYMaiY-WYeL. Sisal fibre and its composites: a review of recent developments. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60(11): 2037–2055.
193.
SaxenaMPappuAHaqueR, et al.Sisal fiber based polymer composites and their applications. In: Cellulose fibers: Bio-and nano-polymer composites. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011, pp. 589–659.
194.
AlemayehuZNallamothuRBLibenM, et al.Experimental investigation on characteristics of sisal fiber as composite material for light vehicle body applications. Mater Today Proc2020; 38: 2439–2444.
195.
SahuPGuptaM. Sisal (Agave sisalana) fibre and its polymer-based composites: a review on current developments. J Reinforced Plastics Compos2017; 36(24): 1759–1780.
196.
CaldasBGSPenaRVAKercheEF, et al.Vacuum infused sandwich structures based on sisal fabrics.
197.
FrazãoCBarrosJToledo FilhoR, et al.Development of sandwich panels combining sisal fiber-cement composites and fiber-reinforced lightweight concrete. Cement and Concrete Compos2018; 86: 206–223.
198.
JeyanthijManjus. Experimental study on sandwich panel using sisal and basalt fiber, 2019.
199.
WaddarSPitchaimaniJDoddamaniM. Effect of thermal loading on syntactic foam sandwich composite. Polym Compo2020; 41(5): 1774–1784.
200.
WaddarSPitchaimaniJDoddamaniM, et al.Buckling and vibration behaviour of syntactic foam core sandwich beam with natural fiber composite facings under axial compressive loads. Compos Part B: Eng2019; 175: 107133.
201.
MahadevappaNShankarVKSehgalS, et al.Study the impact of drilling process parameters on natural fiber reinforced herringbone epoxy composites. Ann de Chimie-Science des Matériaux2020; 44(5): 339–345.
202.
RaoSJayaramanKBhattacharyyaD. Micro and macro analysis of sisal fibre composites hollow core sandwich panels. Compos Part B: Eng2012; 43(7): 2738–2745.
203.
VieiraGomesLMGdos SantosJCPanzeraTH, et al.Novel fibre metal laminate sandwich composite structure with sisal woven core. Ind Crops Prod2017; 99: 189–195.
204.
ArumugamSKandasamyJMd ShahAU, et al.Investigations on the mechanical properties of glass fiber/sisal fiber/chitosan reinforced hybrid polymer sandwich composite scaffolds for bone fracture fixation applications. Polymers2020; 12(7): 1501.
205.
ArumugamSKandasamyJHameed SultanMT, et al.Investigations on fatigue analysis and biomimetic mineralization of glass fiber/sisal fiber/chitosan reinforced hybrid polymer sandwich composites. J Mater Res Technol2021; 10: 512–525.
206.
HaqueMMAliMEHasanM, et al.Chemical treatment of coir fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. Ind Eng Chemistry Res2012; 51(10): 3958–3965.
207.
TaiCKAhmadRAkilHM, et al.Effect of alkali treatment and molding temperature on flexural and impact properties of coir-fibre-epoxy composite. Adv Compos Lett2015; 24(4): 096369351502400403.
208.
ZhouQOuZRaoX, et al.Lignin-carbohydrate complexes from coconut (cocos nucifera) coir: fractionation, structural elucidation, and potential applications. BioResources2020; 153: 7100–7117.
209.
AdeniyiAGOnifadeDVIghaloJO, et al.A review of coir fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos Part B: Eng2019; 176: 107305.
210.
BuiHSebaibiNBoutouilM, et al.Determination and review of physical and mechanical properties of raw and treated coconut fibers for their recycling in construction materials. Fibers2020; 8(6): 37.
211.
MauricioGOHua LunBNathalyA, et al.Innovative bio-composite sandwich wall panels made of coconut bidirectional external veneers and balsa lightweight core as alternative for eco-friendly and structural building applications in high-risk seismic regions. In: By-products of palm trees and their applications, 2019, 11, p. 88.
212.
OliveiraPRdos SantosJCRibeiro FilhoSLM, et al.Eco-friendly sandwich panel based on recycled bottle caps core and natural fibre composite facings. Fibers Polym2020; 21(8): 1798–1807.
213.
AzmiMAAbdullahHZIdrisMI. Sandwich composites of glass fibre panel and polyurethane/coconut coir foam core (GFRP-PUC). In: Key engineering materials. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2011, 471–472, pp. 391–396.
214.
AzmiMAAbdullahHZIdrisMI. Properties of polyurethane foam/coconut coir fiber as a core material and as a sandwich composites component. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia, 1–4 July 2013. IOP Publishing, 2013, 50(1), p. 012067.
215.
Alavez-RamirezRChiñas-CastilloFMorales-DominguezVJ, et al.Thermal conductivity of coconut fibre filled ferrocement sandwich panels. Construction Building Mater2012; 37: 425–431.
216.
YaoJHuYCLuW. A wood replacement material of sandwich structure using coir fiber mats and fiberglass fabrics as core layer. BioResources2012; 7(1): 0663–0674.
217.
NarendarRDasanKP. Effect of chemical treatment on the mechanical and water absorption properties of coir pith/nylon/epoxy sandwich composites. Int J Polymer Analysis Characterization2013; 18(5): 369–376.
218.
JennisetttSihombingHYuhazriM. Flatwise compression analysis of sandwich structures made from chopped strand mat coconut fiber filled polyurethane foam as a core material, 2014.
219.
SoehardjoKABasukiA. Utilization of bagasse and coconut fibers waste as fillers of sandwich composite for bridge railway sleepers. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, Medan, Indonesia, 7–10 November 2016. Medan, 2017, 223, p. 012036.1
220.
LiuTHouSNguyenX, et al.Energy absorption characteristics of sandwich structures with composite sheets and bio coconut core. Compos Part B: Eng2017; 114: 328–338.
221.
HamoudaTHassaninAHKilicA, et al.Hybrid composites from coir fibers reinforced with woven glass fabrics: Physical and mechanical evaluation. Polym Compos2017; 38(10): 2212–2220.
222.
MahdaviMCloustonPLArwadeSR. A low-technology approach toward fabrication of laminated bamboo lumber. Construction Building Mater2012; 29: 257–262.
223.
PalmaBGLeãoRACde SouzaROMA, et al.Immobilization of lipases on lignocellulosic bamboo powder for biocatalytic transformations in batch and continuous flow. Catal Today2020.
224.
LiuXSmithGDJiangZ, et al."Nomenclature for engineered bamboo." (2016). batch and continuous flow. Catal Today2020.
225.
SharmaBvan der VegteA. Engineered bamboo for structural applications. In: Nonconventional and vernacular construction materials. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing; 2020, pp. 597–623.
226.
SunXHeMLiZ. Novel engineered wood and bamboo composites for structural applications: State-of-art of manufacturing technology and mechanical performance evaluation. Construction Building Mater2020; 249: 118751.
227.
SongKRenXZhangL. Bamboo fiber-polymer composites: overview of fabrications, mechanical characterizations and applications. In: Green biocomposites. Cham: Springer; 2017, pp. 209–246.
228.
JanssenJJA. Mechanical properties of bamboo. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media, 1991, Vol. 37.
229.
HuangPChangW-SSheaA, et al.Non-homogeneous thermal properties of Bamboo. In: Materials and joints in timber structures. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014, pp. 657–664.
230.
BiswasSShahinurSHasanM, et al.Physical, mechanical and thermal properties of jute and bamboo fiber reinforced unidirectional epoxy composites. Proced Eng2015; 105: 933–939.
231.
SrivaroS. Utilization of bamboo as lightweight sandwich panels. Mater Sci2016; 22(1): 60–64.
232.
IswantoAHAnjaraniHD. The properties of sandwich particleboard (SPB) made from Bamboo Belangke and Corn Stalk Bagasse Bonded with Isocyanat in various levels. IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, Bogor, Indonesia,1–2 August 2018. IOP Publishing, 2018, 209(1), p. 012031.
233.
SargianisJJKimH-IAndresE, et al.Sound and vibration damping characteristics in natural material based sandwich composites. Compos Struct2013; 96: 538–544.
234.
UmerRBalawiSRajaP, et al.The energy-absorbing characteristics of polymer foams reinforced with bamboo tubes. J Sandwich Struct Mater2014; 16(1): 108–122.
235.
GonzálezOMGarcíaAGuachambalaM, et al.Innovative sandwich-like composite biopanels–towards a new building biomaterials concept for structural applications in nonconventional building systems. Wood Material Science & Engineering2021; 16(2): 132–148.
236.
FangHSunHLiuW, et al.Mechanical performance of innovative GFRP-bamboo-wood sandwich beams: experimental and modelling investigation. Compo Part B: Eng2015; 79: 182–196.
237.
SuiGXYuTXKimJK, et al.Mechanical behavior and failure modes of aluminum/bamboo sandwich plates under quasi-static loading. J Mat Sci2000; 35(6): 1445–1452.
238.
OsmanSAhmadM. Flexural and impact properties of bamboo-aluminum sandwich composites. In: Advanced materials research. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2013, pp. 1728–1731, vol. 608.
239.
YangYFahmyMPanZ, et al.Experimental study on basic mechanical properties of new BFRP-bamboo sandwich structure. Construction Building Mater2020; 264.
240.
KamarulzamanNBahariSAZakariaMN, et al.Environmental-friendly sandwich panel using Bamboo skin wastes as core material. In: Key engineering materials. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2007, pp. 41–44, 334–335.
241.
YangFFeiB. The research on bamboo-wood corrugated sandwich panel. In Proceeding of the 55th international convention of society of wood science and technology, Beijing, China,27–31 August 2012.
SenoAHKoswaraESyamsudinH, et al.Analysis of bending loads on Bamboo-Balsa and Bamboo-Polypropylene honeycomb composite sandwiches. In: Advanced materials research. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2015, 1125, pp. 94–99.
244.
CaturADSuartikaIMTriadiAAA, et al.Effect of insertion angle and distance of bamboo z-pin n shear and compressive strengths of sandwich composites.
245.
SetyawanPDSugimanSSaputraY. Characterization of compressive and short beam shear strength of bamboo opened cell foam core sandwich composites. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, Solo, Indonesia, 11–12 November 2015. AIP Publishing LLC, 2016, 1717(1), p. 040016.
246.
SetyawanPDSugimanJAchmadSL. Effect of bamboo fiber length in opened cell foam core sandwich composite on water absorption and their mechanical properties. In: AIP conference proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC, 1977(1), 2018, p. 030021.
247.
ShahMdAinUSultanMTH, et al.Sandwich-structured bamboo powder/glass fibre-reinforced epoxy hybrid composites–mechanical performance in static and dynamic evaluations. J Sandwich Struct Mater2019; 23: 1099636218822740.
248.
KaliNPathakSKorlaS. Effect on vibration characteristics of fiber metal laminates sandwiched with natural fibers. Mater Today Proc2020; 28: 1092–1096.
249.
HartoniJFAnshariBCaturAD. Effect of core and skin thicknesses of bamboo sandwich composite on bending strength. Int J Mech Eng Technol2017; 8: 551–560.
250.
DarziSKarampourHGilbertBtP, et al.Flexural behaviour of a novel bamboo-plywood sandwich composite panel. In: World conference on timber engineering (WCTE 2018), Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2018.
251.
DarziSKarampourHGilbertBP, et al.Numerical study on the flexural capacity of ultra-light composite timber sandwich panels. Compos Part B: Eng2018; 155: 212–224.
252.
DarziSKarampourHGilbertBP, et al.Efficiency of sandwich bamboo-plywood floor panels with various core configurations. In: ACMSM25. Singapore: Springer, 2020, pp. 91–101.
253.
DarziSKarampourHBailleresH, et al., Load bearing sandwich timber walls with plywood faces and bamboo core. Structures2020; 27: 2437–2450.
254.
DarziSKarampourHBailleresH, et al. Experimental study on bending and shear behaviours of composite timber sandwich panels. Constr Build Mater2020; 259: 119723.
255.
Ávila de OliveiraLCouraGLCPassaiaTonattoML, et al.A novel sandwich panel made of prepreg flax skins and bamboo core. Compo Part C: Open Access2020; 3: 100048.
256.
JarusombutiSHizirogluSBauchongkolP, et al.Properties of sandwich-type panels made from bamboo and rice straw. For Products J2009; 59(10): 52–57.
257.
RoslanSAHHassanMZRasidZA, et al.Mechanical properties of bamboo reinforced epoxy sandwich structure composites. Int J Automotive Mech Eng2015; 12: 2882–2892.
258.
PozzerTGaussCAment BarbiratoGH, et al.Trapezoidal core sandwich panel produced with sugarcane bagasse. Constr Build Mater2020; 264: 120718.
259.
MoreS. Finite modelling of impact behaviour of sandwich panel with bagasse composite core. The UNSW Canberra ADFA J Undergraduate Eng Res2015; 7(2).
260.
Heidari-shahmalekiEZeinediniA. Application of cotton/epoxy laminated composites to fabricate the uni-and bi- directional cosine corrugated cores sandwich panels. J Sci Technol Compo2020; 7(2): 863–872.
261.
SubagyoAAminTM. Impact modeling of bio-textile composite from agave and pineapple leaf fibers with sandwich structure. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 23–24 October 2019, 722(1). IOP Publishing, 2020, p. 012073.
262.
ChandaANam KimKWijayaW, et al.Fire reaction of sandwich panels with corrugated and honeycomb cores made from natural materials. J Sandwich Struct Mater2020; 23: 1099636221989234.
263.
De BoerJGGMHofmeyerMMaljaarsJ, et al.Two-way coupled CFD fire and thermomechanical FE analyses of a self-supporting sandwich panel façade system. Fire Saf J2019; 105: 154–168.
264.
ChenC-TGuGX. Machine learning for composite materials. MRS Commun2019; 9(2): 556–566.
265.
DabetwarSEkwaro-OsireSPaulo DiasJ. Damage classification of composites using machine learning. In: ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 11–14 November 2019, 83501. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2019, p. V013T13A017.
266.
GuilleminotJDolbowJE. Data-driven enhancement of fracture paths in random composites. Mech Res Commun2020; 103: 103443.
267.
OliveiraPRMayMPanzeraTH, et al.Reinforced biobased adhesive for eco-friendly sandwich panels. Int J Adhes Adhesives2020; 98: 102550.
268.
KimuraTTakeuchiMNagaiN, et al.Compression molding of sandwich plate using waste cord assemblage of synthetic fabrics. J Soc Mater Sci Jpn1998; 47(6appendix): 124–129.
269.
WongYCMahyuddinNAminuddinAMR. Development of thermal insulation sandwich panels containing end-of-life vehicle (ELV) headlamp and seat waste. Waste Management2020; 118: 402–415.
270.
KayaGHaytaN. characteristic properties and behavior under flexural and impact loadings of packaging-waste/E-Glass/epoxy sandwich composites for construction applications. Int J Adv Eng Pure Sci2019; 312: 84–91.
