Hybridization of face, core and their combination is of great interest to develop high performance composite sandwich panels. In this regards, hybrid core of ‘polyester pin-reinforced foam filled honeycomb sandwich panels’ was fabricated and compared with unreinforced ‘foam filled honeycomb sandwich panels’ in terms of compressive and low velocity impact performances. MATLAB image processing techniques was applied to determine the impact damage area. Incorporating reinforcing pins for connecting faces and core is an effectual way to improve interfacial bonding, also imparts through thickness properties for sandwich panels. Compression tests performed on the sandwich panels revealed that the polyester pin reinforcement in foam filled honeycomb sandwich panel enhanced the load bearing capacity considerably. The low velocity impact properties such as load at initial damage, total absorbed energy were greatly improved and impact damage area reduced significantly by the addition of the pins.
AbrateS.Localized impact on sandwich structures with laminated facings. Appl Mech Rev1997;
50: 69–82.
4.
CantwellWJScudamoreRRatcliffeJ, et al.
Interfacial fracture in sandwich laminates. Compos Sci Technol1999;
59: 2079–2085.
5.
WangJWaasAMWangH.Experimental and numerical study on the low-velocity impact behavior of foam-core sandwich panels. Compos Struct2013;
96: 298–311.
6.
JiGOuyangZLiG.Debonding and impact tolerant sandwich panel with hybrid foam core. Compos Struct2013;
103: 143–150.
7.
MoradaGOuaddayRVadeanA, et al.
Low-velocity impact resistance of ATH/epoxy core sandwich composite panels: Experimental and numerical analyses. Compos B Eng2017;
114: 418–431.
8.
LiuJHeWXieD, et al.
The effect of impactor shape on the low-velocity impact behavior of hybrid corrugated core sandwich structures. Compos B Eng2017;
111: 315–331.
9.
LiuLFengHTangH, et al.
Impact resistance of Nomex honeycomb sandwich structures with thin fibre reinforced polymer facesheets. J Sandwich Struct Mater2016; 20: 531–552.
10.
RajuKSSmithBLTomblinJS, et al.
Impact damage resistance and tolerance of honeycomb core sandwich panels. J Compos Mater2008;
42: 385–412.
ZenkertDShipshaABullP, et al.
Damage tolerance assessment of composite sandwich panels with localised damage. Compos Sci Technol2005;
65: 2597–2611.
13.
RamakrishnanKRGuerardSViotP, et al.
Effect of block copolymer nano-reinforcements on the low velocity impact response of sandwich structures. Compos Struct2014;
110: 174–182.
14.
AvilaAFCarvalhoMGRDiasEC, et al.
Nano-structured sandwich composites response to low-velocity impact. Compos Struct2010;
92: 745–751.
15.
ReisPNBSantosPFerreiraJAM, et al.
Impact response of sandwich composites with nano-enhanced epoxy resin. J Reinf Plast Compos2013;
32: 898–906.
16.
WangHRamakrishnanKRShankarK.Experimental study of the medium velocity impact response of sandwich panels with different cores. Mater Des2016;
99: 68–82.
17.
LuoRKGreenERMorrisonCJ.An approach to evaluate the impact damage initiation and propagation in composite plates. Compos B Eng2001;
32: 513–520.
18.
KursunASenelMEnginsoyHM, et al.
Effect of impactor shapes on the low velocity impact damage of sandwich composite plate: Experimental study and modelling. Compos B Eng2016;
86: 143–151.
19.
SaklyALaksimiAKebirH, et al.
Experimental and modelling study of low velocity impacts on composite sandwich structures for railway applications. Eng Fail Anal2016;
68: 22–31.
20.
ChenYHouSFuK, et al.
Low-velocity impact response of composite sandwich structures: Modelling and experiment. Compos Struct2017;
168: 322–334.
21.
PegorinFPingkarawatKDaynesS, et al.
Influence of z-pin length on the delamination fracture toughness and fatigue resistance of pinned composites. Compos B Eng2015;
78: 298–307.
22.
HenaoAde VilloriaRGCuarteroJ, et al.
Enhanced impact energy absorption characteristics of sandwich composites through tufting. Mech Adv Mater Struct2015;
22: 1016–1023.
23.
NanayakkaraAFeihSMouritzAP.Experimental analysis of the through-thickness compression properties of z-pinned sandwich composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2011;
42: 1673–1680.
24.
AbdiBAzwanSAbdullahMR, et al.
Flatwise compression and flexural behavior of foam core and polymer pin-reinforced foam core composite sandwich panels. Int J Mech Sci2014;
88: 138–144.
25.
AbdiBAzwanSAbdullahMR, et al.
Comparison of foam core sandwich panel and through-thickness polymer pin–reinforced foam core sandwich panel subject to indentation and flatwise compression loadings. Polym Compos2016;
37: 612–619.
26.
MarascoAICartiéDDRPartridgeIK, et al.
Mechanical properties balance in novel Z-pinned sandwich panels: Out-of-plane properties. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2006;
37: 295–302.
27.
VaidyaUKKamathMVHosurM, et al.
Low-velocity impact response of cross-ply laminated sandwich composites with hollow and foam-filled Z-pin reinforced core. J Compos Technol Res1999;
21: 84–97.
28.
HanFYanYMaJ.Experimental study and progressive failure analysis of stitched foam-core sandwich composites subjected to low-velocity impact. Polym Compos2016; 39: 624–635.
29.
WallaceBTSankarBVIfjuPG.Pin reinforcement of delaminated sandwich beams under axial compression. J Sandwich Struct Mater2001;
3: 117–129.
30.
BurlayenkoVNSadowskiT.Analysis of structural performance of sandwich plates with foam-filled aluminum hexagonal honeycomb core. Comput Mater Sci2009;
45: 658–662.
NagarajanVASundaramSRajaduraiJS.A novel approach based on digital image analysis to evaluate refined delamination factor for E-Glass 21xK43 Gevetex/LY556/DY063 epoxy composite laminates. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf2011;
225: 1977–1982.
36.
WangBWuLJinX, et al.
Experimental investigation of 3D sandwich structure with core reinforced by composite columns. Mater Des2010;
31: 158–165.
37.
Alavi NiaASadeghiMZ.The effects of foam filling on compressive response of hexagonal cell aluminum honeycombs under axial loading-experimental study. Mater Des2010;
31: 1216–1230.
38.
AtasCSaymanO.An overall view on impact response of woven fabric composite plates. Compos Struct2008;
82: 336–345.
39.
KimT-WandHwangS-S. Damage evolution and mechanical properties of woven glass fiber\polymer composites under low-velocity impact. In: 25th annual conference on composites, advanced ceramics, materials, and structures: A: Ceramic engineering and science proceedings, New Jersey, 2001, pp.323–329. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
40.
UdeAUAriffinAKAzhariCH.Impact damage characteristics in reinforced woven natural silk/epoxy composite face-sheet and sandwich foam, coremat and honeycomb materials. Int J Impact Eng2013;
58: 31–38.
41.
NanayakkaraAFeihSMouritzAP.Experimental impact damage study of a z-pinned foam core sandwich composite. J Sandwich Struct Mater2012;
14: 469–486.
42.
Al-ShamaryAKJKarakuzuROzdemirO.Low-velocity impact response of sandwich composites with different foam core configurations. J Sandwich Struct Mater2016;
18: 754–768.
