Mechanical performance of marine sandwich panels comprising E-glass/vinyl ester face sheets and perforated poly-vinyl chloride foam core was evaluated and compared with conventional foam core sandwich panels. Circular holes through the foam core thickness were drilled with 12 different arrangements in square patterns and the holes were filled with the resin during the infusion process which created the through-the-thickness solid resin pins. The effect of each pattern on the flatwise compression and core shear properties of the sandwich panels were experimentally investigated. The three-point bending maximum failure load of perforated foam core sandwich panels was increased over 133.8% by increasing the diameter of the resin pins at the expense of increased panel weight up to 67%. The flatwise compression stress to induce core crushing was significantly increased by reinforcing the resin pins.
ASTM C274-99. ASTM standard terminology of structural sandwich constructions.
3.
DanielIGdoutosEWangKA, et al.
Failure modes of composite sandwich beams. Int J Damage Mech2002;
11: 309–334.
4.
DanielIMGdoutosEEAbotJL, et al.
Deformation and failure of composite sandwich structures. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2003;
16: 345–364.
5.
KarlssonKFTomasÅströmB.Manufacturing and applications of structural sandwich components. Compos Part A1997;
28: 97–111.
6.
DaiJHahnHT.Flexural behavior of sandwich beams fabricated by vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding. Compos Struct2003;
61: 247–253.
7.
TruxelAAvilesFCarlssonL, et al.
Influence of face/core interface on debond toughness of foam and balsa cored sandwich. J Sandwich Struct Mater2006;
8: 237–258.
8.
PetrescueLHubertPGordonSet al. Characterization of defects in low-cost resin-infused aeronautical structures. In: The 5th Canadian international composites conference (CICC), University of Delaware, Newark, USA, 7–9 July 2004, pp.491–495.
9.
MouritzALeongKHerszbergI.A review of the effect of stitching on the in-plane mechanical properties of fibre-reinforced polymer composites. Compos Part A1997;
28: 979–991.
10.
LascoupBAbouraZKhellilK, et al.
On the mechanical effect of stitch addition in sandwich panel. Compos Sci Technol2006;
66: 1385–1398.
11.
LascoupBAbouraZKhellilK, et al.
Core–skin interfacial toughness of stitched sandwich structure. Compos Part B2014;
67: 363–370.
12.
RiccioALindePRaimondoA, et al.
On the use of selective stitching in stiffened composite panels to prevent skin-stringer debonding. Compos Part B2017;
124: 64–75.
13.
MouritzA.Review of z-pinned composite laminates. Compos Part A2007;
38: 2383–2397.
14.
MouritzA.Compression properties of z-pinned sandwich composites. J Mater Sci2006;
41: 5771–5774.
15.
NanayakkaraAFeihSMouritzA.Experimental analysis of the through-thickness compression properties of z-pinned sandwich composites. Compos Part A2011;
42: 1673–1680.
16.
KohTIsaMFeihS, et al.
Experimental assessment of the damage tolerance of z-pinned T-stiffened composite panels. Compos Part B2013;
44: 620–627.
17.
MitraN.A methodology for improving shear performance of marine grade sandwich composites: sandwich composite panel with shear key. Compos Struct2010;
92: 1065–1072.
18.
MostafaAShankarKMorozovE.In-plane shear behaviour of composite sandwich panel incorporated with shear keys methodology at different orientations: finite element study. J Compos Mater2014;
48: 2945–2959.
19.
MitraNRajaB.Improving delamination resistance capacity of sandwich composite columns with initial face/core debond. Compos Part B2012;
43: 1604–1612.
20.
May-PatAAvilesFAguilarJ.Mechanical properties of sandwich panels with perforated foam cores. J Sandwich Struct Mater2011;
13: 427–444.
21.
HalimiFGolzarMAsadiP, et al.
Core modifications of sandwich panels fabricated by vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding. J Compos Mater2013;
47: 1853–1863.
22.
AbdiBAzwanSAbdullahM, et al.
Flatwise compression and flexural behavior of foam core and polymer pin-reinforced foam core composite sandwich panels. Int J Mech Sci2014;
88: 138–144.
23.
AbdiBAzwanSAbdullahM, et al.
Comparison of foam core sandwich panel and through‐thickness polymer pin–reinforced foam core sandwich panel subject to indentation and flatwise compression loadings. Polym Compos2016;
37: 612–619.
24.
YalkinHEIctenBMAlpyildizT.Enhanced mechanical performance of foam core sandwich composites with through the thickness reinforced core. Compos Part B2015;
79: 383–391.
25.
YalkinHEIctenBMAlpyildizT.Tensile and compressive performances of foam core sandwich composites with various core modifications. J Sandwich Struct Mater2017;
19: 49–65.
26.
Di BellaGBorsellinoCCalabreseL.Effects of manufacturing procedure on unsymmetrical sandwich structures under static load conditions. Mater Des2012;
35: 457–466.
27.
ToygarMETeeKFMalekiFK, et al.
Experimental, analytical and numerical study of mechanical properties and fracture energy for composite sandwich beams. J Sandwich Struct Mater2017; 21: 1167–1189.
28.
International Standard, ISO 14125. Fibre-reinforced plastic composites – determination of flexural properties.
29.
International Standard. Plastics – ISO 527-1-determination of tensile properties – part 1: general principles.
30.
ASTM D6641/D6641M. Standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials using a combined loading compression (CLC) test fixture.
31.
ASTM D7078/D7078M. Standard test method for shear properties of composite materials by V-notched rail shear method.
32.
ASTM C393/C393M-16. Standard test method for core shear properties of sandwich constructions by beam flexure.
33.
Di BellaGCalabreseLBorsellinoC.Mechanical characterisation of a glass/polyester sandwich structure for marine applications. Mater Des2012;
42: 486–494.
34.
ASTM C365/C365M-05. Standard test method for flatwise compressive properties of sandwich cores.
35.
WangBWuLJinX, et al.
Experimental investigation of 3D sandwich structure with core reinforced by composite columns. Mater Des2010;
31: 158–165.
36.
ManaloA.Behaviour of fibre composite sandwich structures under short and asymmetrical beam shear tests. Compos Struct2013;
99: 339–349.
