The role of a composite polycarbonate-aerogel face shield in protecting the human brain from blast-induced injury: A fluid–structure interaction (FSI) study
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2019
The role of a composite polycarbonate-aerogel face shield in protecting the human brain from blast-induced injury: A fluid–structure interaction (FSI) study
Blast-induced traumatic brain injury is the most prevalent injury sustained by combat soldiers at the frontline. The current study aims to investigate the effectiveness of composite polycarbonate-aerogel face shields with different configurations in mitigating blast-induced brain injuries.
Method
A series of dynamic fluid–structure interaction simulations of a helmeted head subjected to a frontal free field blast was performed, to evaluate the effectiveness of the current conventional polycarbonate face shield and three other composite face shields with different configurations when exposed to a frontal free-field blast.
Results
The simulation results demonstrated that the sandwiched structured face shields of polycarbonate and aerogel provided superior blast attenuation than a single-layered polycarbonate face shield. The alternate multi-layered transparent materials of high and low densities provided the best attenuation of blast pressure transmission to the head, with the polycarbonate exterior shell casing contributing to the structural integrity of the face shield, while the lower dense aerogel filler providing high acoustic impedance to blast wave transmission.
Conclusion
This study provides further insights on future development and design of personal protective equipment in mitigating blast-induced injuries to the head.
BenzingerTLBrodyDCardinS, et al.Blast-related brain injury: imaging for clinical and research applications: report of the 2008 st. Louis workshop. J Neurotrauma2009; 26: 2127–2144.
2.
MathersCDLopezADMurrayCJLThe burden of disease and mortality by condition: Data, methods and results for 2001. In: LopezAMathersCEzzatiM, et al.(eds). Global burden of disease and risk factors, 1st ed. Washington, D.C: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank Group, 2006, pp. 45–240.
3.
ClemedsonCJ. Shock wave transmission to the central nervous system. Acta Physiol Scand1956; 37: 204–214.
4.
ClemedsonCJJonssonA. Transmission of elastic disturbances caused by air shock waves in a living body. J Appl Physiol1961; 16: 426–430.
5.
BowenIGFletcherERRichmondDR, et al.Biophysical mechanisms and scaling procedures applicable in assessing responses of the thorax energized by air-blast overpressures or by nonpenetrating missiles. Ann N Y Acad Sci1968; 152: 122–146.
6.
RichmondDRDamonEGFletcherER, et al.The relationship between selected blast-wave parameters and the response of mammals exposed to air blast. Ann N Y Acad Sci1968; 152: 103–121.
7.
LeeHPGongSW. Finite element analysis for the evaluation of protective functions of helmets against ballistic impact. Comput Meth Biomech Biomed Eng2010; 13: 537–550.
8.
PinnojiPKMahajanP. Analysis of impact-induced damage and delamination in the composite shell of a helmet. Mater Des2010; 31: 3716–3723.
9.
TanLBTseKMLeeHP, et al.Performance of an advanced combat helmet with different interior cushioning systems in ballistic impact: experiments and finite element simulations. Int J Impact Eng2012; 50: 99–112.
10.
TseKMTanLBYangB, et al.Effect of helmet liner systems and impact directions on severity of head injuries sustained in ballistic impacts: a finite element (FE) study. Med Biol Eng Comput2017; 55(4): 641–662.
11.
Rodríguez-MillánMItoTLoyaJA, et al.Development of numerical model for ballistic resistance evaluation of combat helmet and experimental validation. Mater Des2016; 110: 391–403.
12.
SahooDRobbeCDeckC, et al.Head injury assessment of non-lethal projectile impacts: A combined experimental/computational method. Injury2016; 47: 2424–2441.
13.
MossWCKingMJBlackmanEG. Skull flexure from blast waves: a mechanism for brain injury with implications for helmet design. Phys Rev Lett2009; 103: 108702–108702.
14.
Ganpule S, Gu L and Chandra N. Modeling shock response of helmeted head using fluid structure interaction. In: 16th US national congress of theoretical and applied mechanics, Pennsylvania, USA, June 27–July 2 2010, pp.1–3. Pennysylvania: Pennsylvania State University.
15.
GrujicicMBellWCPanduranganB, et al.Blast-wave impact-mitigation capability of polyurea when used as helmet suspension-pad material. Mater Des2010; 31: 4050–4065.
16.
GrujicicMArakereAPanduranganB, et al.Computational investigation of shock-mitigation efficacy of polyurea when used in a combat helmet: a core sample analysis. Multidis Model Mater Struct2012; 8: 297–331.
17.
NyeinMKJasonAMYuL, et al.In silico investigation of intracranial blast mitigation with relevance to military traumatic brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2010; 107(48): 20703–20708.
18.
Sarvghad-Moghaddam H, Jazi MS, Rezaei A, et al. (2014) Examination of the protective roles of helmet/faceshield and directionality for human head under blast waves. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 18:1846–1855.
19.
Agoston DV and Kamnaksh A. Modeling the neurobehavioral consequences of blast-induced traumatic brain injury spectrum disorder and identifying related biomakers. In: Kobeissy FH (ed.) Brain neurotrauma: molecular, neuropsychological, and rehabilitation aspects. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, 2015, p.687.
20.
Sharma S and Zhang L. Prediction of intracranial responses from blast induced neurotrauma using a validated finite element model of human head. In: Ohio state university injury biomechanics symposium, Ohio, US, 22 May–24 May 2011.
21.
Ganpule SG. Mechanics of blast loading on thepost-mortem human and surrogate heads in the study of traumatic brain injury (TBI) using experimental and computational approaches. PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA, 2013, p. 289.
22.
TanLBChewFSTseKM, et al.Impact of complex blast waves on the human head – a computational study. Int J Num Meth Biomed Eng2014; 30(12): 1476–1505.
23.
Moore DF, Jerusalem A, Nyein M, et al. Computational biology – modeling of primary blast effects on the central nervous system. Neuroimage 2009; August(47 Suppl 2): T10–T20.
24.
ChafiMKaramiGZiejewskiM. Biomechanical assessment of brain dynamic responses due to blast pressure waves. Ann Biomed Eng2010; 38: 490–504.
25.
GanpuleSGuLAlaiA, et al.Role of helmet in the mechanics of shock wave propagation under blast loading conditions. Comput Meth Biomech Biomed Eng2012; 15: 1233–1244.
26.
GanpuleSAlaiAPlougonvenE, et al.Mechanics of blast loading on the head models in the study of traumatic brain injury using experimental and computational approaches. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2012; 12: 511–531.
Vechart, A. Design of a Composite Combat Helmet Liner for Prevention of Blast-Induced Traumatic Brain Injury. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, US, 2011, M.Sc. Thesis, p.128.
ZongZLeeHPLuC. A three-dimensional human head finite element model and power flow in a human head subject to impact loading. J Biomech2006; 39: 284–292.
32.
Nahum AM, Smith R and Ward CC. Intracranial pressure dynamics during head impact. In: 21st stapp car crash conference. SAE Paper No. 770922, 1977, p. 339–66. San Diego, USA: Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE).
33.
Tan LB, Tse KM, Lee HP, et al. Ballistic impact analysis on the advanced combat helmet (ACH)-testing and simulation. In: 9th international conference on composite science and technology (ICCST): 2020 – scientific and industrial challenges (ed M Meo), Sorrento, Naples, Italy, 24–26 April 2013, pp.523–544. Sorrento, Italy: Destech Publications, Inc.,
34.
Lebel S, Gendron MP, Belanger M, et al. Ballistic and impact protective visor system for military helmet assembly. Google Patents, 2011.
35.
Dewey JM. The shape of the blast wave: studies of the Friedlander equation. In: 21st international symposium on military aspects of blast and shock (MABS), Jerusalem, Israel, 3–8 October 2010.
36.
GrujicicALaBergeMGrujicicM, et al.Potential improvements in shock-mitigation efficacy of a polyurea-augmented advanced combat helmet. J Mater Eng Perform2012; 21: 1562–1579.
37.
Ward CC, Chan M and Nahum AM. Intracranial pressure-a brain injury criterion. In: 24th stapp car crash conference, 15–17 October 1980, Troy, Michigan, USA, 1980, pp.347–360. [SAE Paper No. 801304]. Warrendale, USA: Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE).
38.
KleivenS. Evaluation of head injury criteria using a finite element model validated against experiments on localized brain motion, intracerebral acceleration, and intracranial pressure. Int J Crashworthiness2006; 11: 65–79.
39.
YangJDaiJ. Simulation-based assessment of rear effect to ballistic helmet impact. Comput Aid Des Appl2010; 7: 59–73.
40.
McElhaneyJHFogleJLMelvinJW, et al.Mechanical properties on cranial bone. J Biomech1970; 3: 495–511.
41.
Nyein MK. Computational modeling of primary blast effects on the human brain. PhD Thesis, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), MA, USA, 2013, p.167.
42.
BhardwajRZieglerKSeoJH, et al.A computational model of blast loading on the human eye. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2014; 13: 123–140.
43.
KarimiARazaghiRNavidbakhshM, et al.Computing the stresses and deformations of the human eye components due to a high explosive detonation using fluid–structure interaction model. Injury2016; 47: 1042–1050.
44.
CooperGJ. Protection of the lung from blast overpressure by thoracic stress wave decouplers. J Trauma1996; 40: S105–S110.
45.
DoblaréMGarcíaJMGómezMJ. Modelling bone tissue fracture and healing: a review. Eng Fract Mech2004; 71: 1809–1840.
46.
HardyCHMarcalPV. Elastic analysis of a skull. J Appl Mech1973; 40: 838–842.
47.
NickellRMarcalP. In vacuo model dynamic response of the human skull. J Eng Ind1974; 4: 490–494.
48.
Ward CC and Thompson RB. The development of a detailed finite element brain model. In: 19th stapp car crash conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 17–19 November 1975, pp.641–674.New York, USA: Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), SAE Paper No. 751163.
49.
BocciaEGizziACherubiniC, et al.Viscoelastic computational modeling of the human head-neck system: Eigenfrequencies and time-dependent analysis. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Engng2017, pp. e2900–e2900. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.2900.
50.
MillerKWittekAJoldesG. Biomechanics of the brain for computer-integrated surgery. Acta Bioeng Biomech2010; 12: 25–37.
51.
MaoHUnnikrishnanGRakeshV, et al.Untangling the effect of head acceleration on brain responses to blast waves. J Biomech Eng2015; 137: 124502–124507.
52.
KleivenS. Predictors for traumatic brain injuries evaluated through accident reconstructions. Stapp Car Crash J2007; 51: 81–114.
53.
VelardiFFraternaliFAngelilloM. Anisotropic constitutive equations and experimental tensile behavior of brain tissue. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2006; 5: 53–61.
54.
MeaneyDF. Relationship between structural modeling and hyperelastic material behavior: application to CNS white matter. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2003; 1: 279–293.
55.
PetrKBondiMWWardSR, et al.On sources of error in finite element simulations of blast effects in the human brain. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn2012; 7: 031008–031008.
56.
MendisKKStalnakerRLAdvaniSH. A constitutive relationship for large deformation finite element modeling of brain tissue. J Biomech Eng1995; 117: 279–285.
57.
PanzerMBMyersBSBassCR. Mesh considerations for finite element blast modelling in biomechanics. Comput Meth Biomech Biomed Eng2013; 16: 612–621.
58.
Tan LB, Lee HP and Tan VBC. Performance evaluation and design improvement of interior cushioning system of ballistic helmets. Report for the DSO National Laboratories, Defence Medical and Environmental Research Institute (DMERI). Singapore: National University of Singapore, 2012.
59.
Zhang L, Makwana R and Sharma S. Comparison of the head response in blast insult with and without combat helmet. Wayne State University, Report for USADOD, W81XWH-08-1-0678 (LYZ), 2011, pp.1–18.
60.
Sharma S. Biomechanical analysis of blast induced traumatic brain injury – a finite element modeling and validation study of blast effects on human brain. Master/Science Thesis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wayne State University, MI, USA, 2011, p.115.
61.
ZhangLMakwanaRSharmaS. Brain response to primary blast wave using validated finite element models of human head and advanced combat helmet. Front Neurol2013; 4: 88–88.
62.
Tamiami International Equipment, Inc. Helmets & Face ShieldsMiami, Florida, USA: Tamiami International Equipment, Inc., www.tamiamiarmor.com/Helmets.htm (accessed 17 April 2017).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
