In this work, a numerical finite element model of a 1.82 kg bird impacting a sandwich shield at 175 m/s is developed. Different shield designs are simulated and it appears that very different sandwich behaviours can occur, depending on the design. A new tool to analyse the deformation of the sandwich during impact is presented and is used to study the behaviour of a shield. As this tool makes it possible to easily compare the behaviour of different shields, it is used in a screening study to identify the more influential sandwich design parameters. If all design parameters are considered to be independent, the core out-of-plane plastic plateaus appear to be the most important. The core in-plane properties, elastic modulus and density and the back skin thickness have much less influence on the sandwich deformation under impact.
Dennis N and Lyle D. Bird strike damage & windshield bird strike final report. European Aviation Safety Agency, 2008.
2.
HeimbsS. Computational methods for bird strike simulations: A review. Comput Struct2011; 89: 2093–2112.
3.
European Aviation Safety Agency. CS-25.631 Bird strike damage – certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for large aeroplanes, 2003.
4.
Federal Aviation Administration. Dept. of transportation. ‘Bird Strike Damage’. Part 25 Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes, Sec. 25.631, 2003.
5.
GibsonLJAshbyMF. Cellular solids: structure and properties, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
6.
Barber JP, Taylor HR and Wilbeck JS. Characterization of bird impacts on a rigid plate: Part 1. Technical Report AFFDL-TR-75-5: Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, 1975.
7.
Barber JP, Taylor HR and Wilbeck JS. Bird impact forces and pressures on rigid and compliant targets. Technical Report AFFDL-TR-77-60: Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, 1978.
8.
Wilbeck JS. Impact behavior of low strength projectiles. Technical Report AFML-TR-77-134: Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 1978.
9.
LavoieMAGakwayaAEnsanMNet al.Bird’s substitute tests results and evaluation of available numerical methods. Int J Impact Eng2009; 36: 1276–1287.
10.
HanssenAGGirardYOlovssonLet al.A numerical model for bird strike of aluminium foam-based sandwich panels. Int J Impact Eng2006; 32: 1127–1144.
11.
McCarthyMAXiaoJRMcCarthyCTet al.Modelling of bird strike on an aircraft wing leading edge made from fibre metal laminates – part 2: modelling of impact with SPH bird model. Appl Compos Mater2004; 11: 317–340.
12.
AiroldiACacchioneB. Modelling of impact forces and pressures in Lagrangian bird strike analyses. Int J Impact Eng2006; 32: 1651–1677.
13.
HedayatiRZiaei-RadS. A new bird model and the effect of bird geometry in impacts from various orientations. Aerosp Sci Technol2013; 28: 9–20.
14.
GrimaldiASolloAGuidaMet al.Parametric study of a SPH high velocity impact analysis – a birdstrike windshield application. Compos Struct2013; 96: 616–630.
15.
HoheJHardenackeVFascioVet al.Numerical and experimental design of graded cellular sandwich cores for multi-functional aerospace applications. Mater Des2012; 39: 20–32.
16.
LiuJLiYGaoXet al.Dynamic response of bird strike on aluminium foam-based sandwich panels. Int J Crashworthiness2015; 20: 325–336.
17.
HedayatiRSadighiM. Effect of using an inner plate between two faces of a sandwich structure in resistance to bird-strike impact. J Aerosp Eng2015. 29(1): 04015020.
18.
KoloppARivallantSBouvetC. Experimental study of sandwich structures as armour against medium-velocity impacts. Int J Impact Eng2013; 61: 24–35.
19.
DharmasenaKPWadleyHNXueZet al.Mechanical response of metallic honeycomb sandwich panel structures to high-intensity dynamic loading. Int J Impact Eng2008; 35: 1063–1074.
20.
Johnson GR and Cook WH. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on ballistics, The Netherlands, 1983, pp.541–547.
21.
KoloppAAlvaradoRARivallantSet al.Modeling impact on aluminium sandwich including velocity effects in honeycomb core. J Sandwich Struct Mater2013; 15: 733–757.
22.
Hoo FattMSSirivoluD. A wave propagation model for the high velocity impact response of a composite sandwich panel. Int J Impact Eng2010; 37: 117–130.
23.
Timoshenko SP and Woinowsky-Krieger S. Theory of plates and shells. London: McGraw-Hill.
24.
MorlierJBettebghorDCompressed sensing applied to mode shapes reconstruction. In: AllemangRClerckJDNiezreckiCet al. (eds). Topics in modal analysis IVol. 5, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 1–8.
25.
Grant M, Boyd S and Ye Y. CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programminghttp://cvxr.com/cvx/ (2008, accessed 28 April 2016).
SaltelliAAndresTHHommaT. Sensitivity analysis of model output. Performance of the iterated fractional factorial design method. Comput Stat Data Anal1995; 20: 387–407.
