Mechanical properties of sandwich panels constructed from polystyrene/cement mixed cores and thin cement sheet facings

Abstract

Sandwich panels are made of two materials that are relatively weak in their separated state, but are improved when they are constructed together in a sandwich panel. Sandwich panels can be used for almost any section of a building including roofs, walls and floors. These building components are regularly required to provide insulation properties, weatherproofing properties and durability in addition to providing structural load bearing characteristics. Polystyrene/cement mixed cores and thin cement sheet facings sandwich panels are Australian products made of cement-polystyrene beaded mixture encapsulated between two thick cement board sheets. The structural properties of sandwich panels constructed of polystyrene/cement cores and thin cement sheet facings are relatively unknown. Therefore, in this study, to understand the mechanical behaviour and properties of those sandwich panels, a series of experimental tests have been performed and the outcomes have been explained and discussed. Based on the results of this study, values for modulus of elasticity and ultimate strength of the sandwich panels in dry and saturated conditions have been determined and proposed for practical applications.

Keywords

Sandwich panels polystyrene/cement mixed cores thin cement sheet facings modulus of elasticity ultimate strength

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Australian Bureau Statistics. Population clock. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs%40.nsf/94713ad445ff1425ca25682000192af2/1647509ef7e25faaca2568a900154b63?OpenDocument (2015, accessed 5 December 2015).

Australian Bureau Statistics. Producer price indexes. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/6427.0Main+Features1Mar%202015?OpenDocument (2015, accessed 5 December 2015).

Allan

. Analysis and design of structural sandwich panels, London, UK: Pergamon Press Ltd, 1969.

Petras

. Design of sandwich structures, PhD Thesis, Engineering Department, Cambridge University, 1998, pp. 1–100.

Araffa M and Balaguru PN. Flexural behaviour of high strength-high temperature laminate sandwich beams. In: Proceedings of eight international symposium and workshop on ferrocement and thin reinforced cement composites, Bangkok Thailand, 6-8 February 2006, IFS, pp.189–201.

Serrano

PJC

Uday

Nasim

. Low velocity impact response of autoclaved aerated concrete/CFRP sandwich plates. Compos Struct 2007; 80: 621–630.

Bottcher

Lange

. Sandwich panels with openings. Compos Construction Steel Concrete 2006; 186: 137–146.

Villanueva

Cantwell

. The high velocity impact response of composite and FML-reinforced sandwich structures. Compos Sci Technol 2004; 64: 35–54.

Nemat-Nasser

Kang

Mc Gee

. Experimental investigation of energy-absorption characteristics of components of sandwich structures. Int J Impact Eng 2007; 34: 1119–1146.

10.

Davies

. Sandwich panels. Thin Wall Struct 1993; 16: 179–198.

11.

Mousa

Uddin

. Global buckling of composite structural insulated wall panels. Mater Des 2010; 32: 766–772.

12.

Gdoutos

Daniel

. Failure modes of composite sandwich beams. Theor Appl Mech 2008; 35: 105–118.

13.

Zenkert

. An introduction to sandwich construction, West Midlands, UK: Engineering Materials Advisory Service Ltd., 1995.

14.

Daniel

Gdoutos

Wang

. Failure modes of composites sandwich beams. Int J Damage Mech 2002; 16: 309–334.

15.

Mouli

Khelafi

. Strength of short composite rectangular hollow section columns filled with lightweight aggregate concrete. Eng Struct 2006; 29: 1791–1797.

16.

Tabatabaiefar

Fatahi

Samali

. An empirical relationship to determine lateral seismic response of mid-rise building frames under influence of soil-structure interaction. Struct Des Tall Special Build 2014; 23: 526–548.

17.

Tabatabaiefar

Fatahi

Samali

. Numerical and experimental investigations on seismic response of building frames under influence of soil-structure interaction. Adv Struct Eng 2014; 17: 109–130.

18.

Carmichael

. Pumice concrete panels. Concrete Int 1986; 8: 31–32.

19.

Ergul

Cengiz

Aleaettin

. Strength and properties of lightweight concrete made with basaltic pumice and fly ash. Mater Lett 2003; 57: 2267–2270.

20.

Tabatabaiefar HR, Mansoury B and Zand MJK. Experimental investigations on behaviour of steel structure buildings. In: Proceedings of the 10th pacific conference on earthquake engineering, Australian Earthquake Engineering Society, Sydney, Australia, 6–8 November 2015, paper no. 160.

21.

Tabatabaiefar

Mansoury

. Detail design, building and commissioning of tall building structural models for experimental shaking table tests. Struct Des Tall Special Build. . DOI: 10.1002/tal.1262.

22.

Manalo AC, Aravinthan T, Karunasena W, et al. Flexural behaviour of structural fibre composite sandwich beams in flatwise and edgewise positions, Compos Struct 2010; 92(4): 984–995.

23.

Plain

. Behaviour of innovative fibre composite panels for structural applications, University of Southern Queensland, 2009, pp. 1–106.

24.

Hibbeler

. Mechanics of materials, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan, 1994.

25.

Gross

Hauger

Schröder

. Engineering mechanics 2, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer, 2011.

26.

ASTM International. Standard test method for facing properties of sandwich constructions by long beam flexure, West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2012.

27.

Controls Group. Compression machines. http://www.controls-group.com/eng/concrete-testing-equipment/automax-smart-line-fully-automatic-tester.php (2014, accessed 5 December 2015).

28.

ASTM International. Standard test method for flexure creep of sandwich constructions, West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2008.

29.

Zhu

Chai

. Damage and failure mode maps of composite sandwich panel subjected to quasi-static indentation and low velocity impact. Compos Struct 2013; 101: 204–214.

30.

Fatahi

Khabbaz

Fatahi

. Mechanical characteristics of soft clay treated with fibre and cement. Geosynth Int 2012; 19: 252–262.

31.

Fatahi

. Small-strain properties of soft clay treated with fibre and cement. Geosynth Int 2013; 20: 286–300.