Experimental blast response and quasi-static material property data were obtained for E-glass and carbon face skin sandwich composite panels with balsa, polyvinyl chloride foam, and TYCOR® cores. The pressure versus impulse (P–I) curve methodology enabled the generation of a database of performance envelopes for these sandwich composite panel configurations under different blast loading scenarios. The strength versus deformation properties of various undamaged sandwich composite panels are established numerically and idealized for single-degree-of-freedom modeling. Results show good correspondence between model predictions and experimental results for performance evaluation of the various sandwich composite structural panel configurations that were investigated.
Zhu F and Lu G. A review of blast and impact of metallic and sandwich structures. Electron J Struct Eng 2007; Special Issue: Loading on Structures: 92–101.
4.
LiQMMengH. Pulse loading shape effects on pressure–impulse diagram of an elastic–plastic, single-degree-of-freedom structural model. Int J Mech Sci2002; 44: 1985–1998.
5.
FattMSHPallaL. Analytical modeling of composite sandwich panels under blast loads. J Sandwich Struct Mater2009; 11(4): 357–380.
6.
Departments of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force. Structures to resist effects of accidental explosions. Report no. TM 5-1300/NAVFAC P-397/AFR 88-22, November 2011. Washington, DC: Departments of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force.
7.
Tadepalli T. Performance evaluation of low-rise concrete frame building structures in moderate seismic zones subject to external blast loading. PhD Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Mississippi, MS, USA, 2010.
8.
Tadepalli T and Mullen CL. Vulnerability of low rise buildings to external blast events: damage mapping. In: Proceedings of inaugural conference of the engineering mechanics institute, EM08, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 19–21 May 2008.
9.
Cheng A, Al-Ostaz A, Mullen CL, et al. Nano particle reinforced composites for critical infrastructure protection. Report Submitted to Southeast Region Research Initiative, Managed by UT Battelle for US Department of Energy, Supporting the Department of Homeland Security. Task order. 4000055459, 2009.
10.
Tadepalli T and Mullen CL. Simplified blast simulation procedure for hazard mitigation planning. In: Ninth international conference on structures under shock and impact, Wessex Institute of Technology, New Forest, Southampton, UK, 3–5 July 2006.
11.
Mantena PR, Rajendran AM and Al-Ostaz A. Blast and impact resistant composite structures for navy ships. In: 2010 office of naval research – solid mechanics program: marine composites and sandwich structures conference, University of Maryland, MD, USA, September 27–29, 2010, pp.379–388.
12.
Computers & Structures Inc. Analysis reference manual, SAP 2000V14, Berkeley, USA, 2008.
13.
Tadepalli T and Mantena PR. Computational simulation and experimental characterization of sandwich composite panels subjected to blast loads. In: The 26th annual American society of composites technical conference, Montreal, Canada, 26–28 September 2011, paper no. 1081.
14.
DIAB Group AB. Divinycell H technical manual, October 2010, p.25.
15.
TagarielliVLDeshpandeVSFleckNA. The high strain rate response of PVC foams and end-grain balsa wood. Composites Part B2008; 39: 83–91.
16.
Walter TR and Subhash G. Density dependency of the mechanical behavior of sandwich core materials. In: Proceedings of the XIth international congress and exposition, Orlando, FL, USA, 2–5 June 2008. Bethel, CT: Society for Experimental Mechanics Inc.
17.
BiggsJM. Introduction to structural dynamics, 1st edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 1964.
