The mechanical properties of micro-lattice structures made of interconnected metallic struts are calculated analytically, in order to derive their elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio in the three Cartesian directions. The geometry of the investigated unit cell is a body centered cuboid, which is a more generic case of the well-known body centered cubic geometry. The Bernoulli–Euler and Timoshenko beam theories are used for the analytical solution of the unit cell response under complex loading. The derived elastic constants are compared to the relative numerical ones. The influence of geometrical parameters on the stiffness coefficients of the cellular structure is parametrically determined. The derived elasticity matrices are introduced in a homogenised numerical model of the core and its results are compared to a numerical model with explicit representation of the core geometry indicating an excellent accuracy, while the solution time is considerably reduced.
GibsonLJAshbyMF. Cellular solids: structure and properties, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
2.
ZhuFWangZLuG. Some theoretical considerations on the dynamic response of sandwich structures under impulsive loading. Int J Impact Eng2010; 37: 625–637.
3.
ZhangX-CLiuYWangB. Effects of defects on the in-plane dynamic crushing of metal honeycombs. Int J Mech Sci2010; 52: 1290–1298.
4.
MinesB. Engineered cellular materials, with emphasis on materials produced with additive layer and fold core manufacturing processes. Strain2010; 46: 135–136.
5.
ZhuFZhaoLLuG. A numerical simulation of the blast impact of square metallic sandwich panels. Int J Impact Eng2009; 36: 687–699.
6.
NurickGNLangdonGSChiY. Behaviour of sandwich panels subjected to intense air blast - Part 1: Experiments. Compos Struct2009; 91: 433–441.
7.
LoratoAInnocentiPScarpaF. The transverse elastic properties of chiral honeycombs. Compos Sci Technol2009; 70: 1057–1063.
8.
SebastianH. Virtual testing of sandwich core structures using dynamic finite element simulations. Comput Mater Sci2009; 45: 205–216.
9.
BuitragoBLSantiusteCSánchez-SáezS. Modelling of composite sandwich structures with honeycomb core subjected to high-velocity impact. Compos Struct2009; 92: 2090–2096.
10.
AldersonAAldersonKLAttardD. Elastic constants of 3-, 4- and 6-connected chiral and anti-chiral honeycombs subject to uniaxial in-plane loading. Compos Sci Technol2009; 70: 1042–1048.
11.
AbramovitchHBurgardMEdery-AzulayL. Smart tetrachiral and hexachiral honeycomb: sensing and impact detection. Compos Sci Technol2009; 70: 1072–1079.
12.
ZhangYHQiuXMFangDN. Mechanical properties of two novel planar lattice structures. Int J Solid Struct2008; 45: 3751–3768.
13.
ZhangYFanHFangD. Constitutive relations and failure criterion of planar lattice composites. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68: 3299–3304.
14.
YangM-YHuangJ-SSamC-P. In-plane elastic moduli and plastic collapse strength of regular hexagonal honeycombs with dual imperfections. Int J Mech Sci2008; 50: 43–54.
15.
GonellaSRuzzeneM. Homogenization and equivalent in-plane properties of two-dimensional periodic lattices. Int J Solid Struct2008; 45: 2897–2915.
16.
Flores-JohnsonEALiQMMinesRAW. Degradation of elastic modulus of progressively crushable foams in uniaxial compression. J Cell Plast2008; 44: 415–434.
17.
DaiGMZhangWH. Size effects of basic cell in static analysis of sandwich beams. Int J Solid Struct2008; 45: 2512–2533.
18.
TanXHSohAK. Multi-objective optimization of the sandwich panels with prismatic cores using genetic algorithms. Int J Solid Struct2007; 44: 5466–5480.
19.
LiKGaoXLWangJ. Dynamic crushing behavior of honeycomb structures with irregular cell shapes and non-uniform cell wall thickness. Int J Solid Struct2007; 44: 5003–5026.
20.
YuJLLiJRHuSS. Strain-rate effect and micro-structural optimization of cellular metals. Mech Mater2006; 38: 160–170.
21.
WadleyHNG. Multifunctional periodic cellular metals. Philos Trans Roy Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci2006; 364: 31–68.
22.
CôtéFDeshpandeVSFleckNA. The compressive and shear responses of corrugated and diamond lattice materials. Int J Solid Struct2006; 43: 6220–6242.
23.
RathbunHJZokFWEvansAG. Strength optimization of metallic sandwich panels subject to bending. Int J Solid Struct2005; 42: 6643–6661.
24.
NguyenMQJacombsSSThomsonRS. Simulation of impact on sandwich structures. Compos Struct2005; 67: 217–227.
25.
LiKGaoXLSubhashG. Effects of cell shape and cell wall thickness variations on the elastic properties of two-dimensional cellular solids. Int J Solid Struct2005; 42: 1777–1795.
26.
HayesAMWangADempseyBM. Mechanics of linear cellular alloys. Mech Mater2004; 36: 691–713.
27.
ZhuHXHobdellJRWindleAH. Effects of cell irregularity on the elastic properties of 2D Voronoi honeycombs. J Mech Phys Solid2001; 49: 857–870.
28.
ZhuHXMillsNJ. The in-plane non-linear compression of regular honeycombs. Int J Solid Struct2000; 37: 1931–1949.
29.
GrenestedtJL. Effective elastic behavior of some models for perfect cellular solids. Int J Solid Struct1999; 36: 1471–1501.
30.
FordCMGibsonLJ. Uniaxial strength asymmetry in cellular materials: an analytical model. Int J Mech Sci1998; 40: 521–531.
31.
Bart-SmithHBastawrosAFMummDR. Compressive deformation and yielding mechanisms in cellular Al alloys determined using X-ray tomography and surface strain mapping. Acta Mater1998; 46: 3583–3592.
32.
SwellamMYiSAhmadMF. Mechanical properties of cellular materials. I. Linear analysis of hexagonal honeycombs. J Appl Polym Sci1997; 63: 383–393.
33.
PapkaSDKyriakidesS. In-plane crushing of a polycarbonate honeycomb. Int J Solid Struct35: 239–267.
34.
JangW-YKyriakidesSKraynikAM. On the compressive strength of open-cell metal foams with Kelvin and random cell structures. Int J Solid Struct2010; 47: 2872–2883.
35.
Flores-JohnsonEALiQM. Indentation into polymeric foams. Int J Solid Struct2010; 47: 1987–1995.
36.
CasertaGGalvanettoUIannucciL. Static and dynamic energy absorption of aluminum honeycombs and polymeric foams composites. Mech Adv Mater Struct2010; 17: 366–376.
37.
WangEGardnerNShuklaA. The blast resistance of sandwich composites with stepwise graded cores. Int J Solid Struct2009; 46: 3492–3502.
LiuYDYuJLZhengZJ. A numerical study on the rate sensitivity of cellular metals. Int J Solid Struct2009; 46: 3988–3998.
40.
JangW-YKyriakidesS. On the crushing of aluminum open-cell foams: Part II analysis. Int J Solid Struct2009; 46: 635–650.
41.
JangW-YKyriakidesS. On the crushing of aluminum open-cell foams: Part I. Experiments. Int J Solid Struct2009; 46: 617–634.
42.
DuarteITeixeira-DiasFGraçaA. Failure modes and influence of the quasi-static deformation rate on the mechanical behavior of sandwich panels with aluminum foam cores. Mech Adv Mater Struct2009; 17: 335–342.
43.
OkumuraDOkadaAOhnoN. Buckling behavior of Kelvin open-cell foams under [0 0 1], [0 1 1] and [1 1 1] compressive loads. Int J Solid Struct2008; 45: 3807–3820.
44.
MinesRAW. On the characterisation of foam and micro-lattice materials used in sandwich construction. Strain2008; 44: 71–83.
45.
LiuTDengZCLuTJ. Analytical modeling and finite element simulation of the plastic collapse of sandwich beams with pin-reinforced foam cores. Int J Solid Struct2008; 45: 5127–5151.
46.
JangWYKraynikAMKyriakidesS. On the microstructure of open-cell foams and its effect on elastic properties. Int J Solid Struct2008; 45: 1845–1875.
47.
ZhuHXThorpeSMWindleAH. The effect of cell irregularity on the high strain compression of 2D Voronoi honeycombs. Int J Solid Struct2006; 43: 1061–1078.
48.
RadfordDDMcShaneGJDeshpandeCS. The response of clamped sandwich plates with metallic foam cores to simulated blast loading. Int J Solid Struct2006; 43: 2243–2259.
49.
LeeSBarthelatFMoldovanN. Deformation rate effects on failure modes of open-cell Al foams and textile cellular materials. Int J Solid Struct2006; 43: 53–73.
50.
SongH-WFanZ-JYuG. Partition energy absorption of axially crushed aluminum foam-filled hat sections. Int J Solid Struct2005; 42: 2575–2600.
51.
GongLKyriakidesSJangWY. Compressive response of open-cell foams. Part I: Morphology and elastic properties. Int J Solid Struct2005; 42: 1355–1379.
52.
GongLKyriakidesS. Compressive response of open cell foams Part II: Initiation and evolution of crushing. Int J Solid Struct2005; 42: 1381–1399.
53.
LiQMMinesRAW. Strain measures for rigid crushable foam in uniaxial compression. Strain2002; 38: 132–140.
54.
RobertsAPGarbocziEJ. Elastic moduli of model random three-dimensional closed-cell cellular solids. Acta Mater2001; 49: 189–197.
55.
ChenW. Experimental and numerical study on bending collapse of aluminum foam-filled hat profiles. Int J Solid Struct2001; 38: 7919–7944.
56.
LiQMMinesRAWBirchRS. The crush behaviour of Rohacell-51WF structural foam. Int J Solid Struct2000; 37: 6321–6341.
57.
MillerWSmithCWScarpaF. Flatwise buckling optimization of hexachiral and tetrachiral honeycombs. Compos Sci Technol2009; 70: 1049–1056.
58.
DeshpandeVSFleckNA. Collapse of truss core sandwich beams in 3-point bending. Int J Solid Struct2001; 38: 6275–6305.
59.
WangJEvansAGDharmasenaK. On the performance of truss panels with Kagome cores. Int J Solid Struct2003; 40: 6981–6988.
60.
KooistraGWDeshpandeVSWadleyHNG. Compressive behavior of age hardenable tetrahedral lattice truss structures made from aluminium. Acta Mater2004; 52: 4229–4237.
61.
RathbunHJWeiZHeMY. Measurement and simulation of the performance of a lightweight metallic sandwich structure with a tetrahedral truss core. J Appl Mech2004; 71: 368–374.
QueheillaltDTWadleyHNG. Pyramidal lattice truss structures with hollow trusses. Mater Sci Eng A2005; 397: 132–137.
64.
EvansAGHutchinsonJWFleckNA. The topological design of multifunctional cellular metals. Progr Mater Sci2001; 46: 309–327.
65.
XueZHutchinsonJW. Preliminary assessment of sandwich plates subject to blast loads. Int J Mech Sci2003; 45: 687–705.
66.
WadleyHNGFleckNAEvansAG. Fabrication and structural performance of periodic cellular metal sandwich structures. Compos Sci Technol2003; 63: 2331–2343.
67.
ChirasSMummDREvansAG. The structural performance of near-optimized truss core panels. Int J Solid Struct2002; 39: 4093–4115.
68.
BouwhuisBBeleEHibbardG. Edge effects in compression testing periodic cellular metal sandwich cores. J Mater Sci2008; 43: 3267–3273.
69.
LiuTDengZCLuTJ. Design optimization of truss-cored sandwiches with homogenization. Int J Solid Struct2006; 43: 7891–7918.
70.
KooistraGWQueheillaltDTWadleyHNG. Shear behavior of aluminum lattice truss sandwich panel structures. Mater Sci Eng A2008; 472: 242–250.
71.
SugimuraY. Mechanical response of single-layer tetrahedral trusses under shear loading. Mech Mater2004; 36: 715–721.
72.
ZokFWWaltnerSAWeiZ. A protocol for characterizing the structural performance of metallic sandwich panels: application to pyramidal truss cores. Int J Solid Struct2004; 41: 6249–6271.
73.
LiuTDengZCLuTJ. Minimum weights of pressurized hollow sandwich cylinders with ultralight cellular cores. Int J Solid Struct2007; 44: 3231–3266.
74.
XiongJMaLWuL. Fabrication and crushing behavior of low density carbon fiber composite pyramidal truss structures. Compos Struct2010; 92: 2695–2702.
75.
QueheillaltDTMurtyYWadleyHNG. Mechanical properties of an extruded pyramidal lattice truss sandwich structure. Scripta Mater2008; 58: 76–79.
76.
CoteFBiagiRBart-SmithH. Structural response of pyramidal core sandwich columns. Int J Solid Struct2007; 44: 3533–3556.
77.
BiagiRBart-SmithH. Imperfection sensitivity of pyramidal core sandwich structures. Int J Solid Struct2007; 44: 4690–4706.
78.
LimC-HJeonIKangK-J. A new type of sandwich panel with periodic cellular metal cores and its mechanical performances. Mater Des2009; 30: 3082–3093.
79.
HyunSKarlssonAMTorquatoS. Simulated properties of Kagomé and tetragonal truss core panels. Int J Solid Struct2003; 40: 6989–6998.
80.
SypeckDJWadleyHNG. Multifunctional microtruss laminates: textile synthesis and properties. J Mater Res2001; 16: 890–897.
81.
ZokFWRathbunHJWeiZ. Design of metallic textile core sandwich panels. Int J Solid Struct2003; 40: 5707–5722.
82.
DeshpandeVSFleckNAAshbyMF. Effective properties of the octet-truss lattice material. J Mech Phys Solid2001; 49: 1747–1769.
83.
ElsayedMSAPasiniD. Multiscale structural design of columns made of regular octet-truss lattice material. Int J Solid Struct2010; 47: 1764–1774.
84.
AboudiJGilatR. Micromechanical analysis of lattice blocks. Int J Solid Struct2005; 42: 4372–4392.
LeeYHKangKJ. A wire-woven cellular metal: Part-I, optimal design for applications as sandwich core. Mater Des2009; 30: 4434–4443.
87.
LeeBKKangKJ. A parametric study on compressive characteristics of wire-woven bulk Kagome truss cores. Compos Struct2009; 92: 445–453.
88.
HyunSChoiJEKangKJ. Effect of imperfections on the mechanical behavior of wire-woven bulk kagome truss PCMs under shear loading. J Mech Sci Technol2009; 23: 1270–1277.
89.
LimJ-HKangK-J. Mechanical behavior of sandwich panels with tetrahedral and Kagome truss cores fabricated from wires. Int J Solid Struct2006; 43: 5228–5246.
90.
DoyoyoMHuJW. Multi-axial failure of metallic strut-lattice materials composed of short and slender struts. Int J Solid Struct2006; 43: 6115–6139.
91.
WallachJCGibsonLJ. Mechanical behavior of a three-dimensional truss material. Int J Solid Struct2001; 38: 7181–7196.
92.
WallachJCGibsonLJ. Defect sensitivity of a 3D truss material. Scripta Mater2001; 45: 639–644.
93.
LuxnerMStampflJPettermannH. Finite element modeling concepts and linear analyses of 3D regular open cell structures. J Mater Sci2005; 40: 5859–5866.
94.
ShenYMckownSTsopanosS. The mechanical properties of sandwich structures based on metal lattice architectures. J Sandwich Struct Mater2010; 12: 159–180.
95.
BrooksWKToddJSutcliffeCJ. The production of open cellular lattice structures using selective laser melting. In: 6th National Conference on Rapid Design, Prototyping, and Manufacturing, Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College, 2005.
96.
TsopanosSMinesRAWMcKownS. The influence of processing parameters on the mechanical properties of selectively laser melted stainless steel microlattice structures. J Manuf Sci Eng2010; 132: 041011–041011.
97.
SharpeWN. Mechanical property measurement at the micro/nano-scale. Strain2008; 44: 20–26.
98.
McKownSShenYBrookesWK. The quasi-static and blast loading response of lattice structures. Int J Impact Eng2008; 35: 795–810.
99.
LabeasGNSunaricMM. Investigation on the static response and failure process of metallic open lattice cellular structures. Strain2008; 46: 195–204.
100.
MinesRAWMcKownSCantwellW. On the progressive collapse of micro lattice structures. Netherlands: Springer, 2007.
101.
UshijimaK.CantwellW.MinesR.. An investigation into the compressive properties of stainless steel micro-lattice structures. J Sandwich Struct Mater2011; 13: 303–329.
102.
Hans-Peter DegischerBK. Handbook of cellular metals: production, processing, applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2002.
