Sandwich materials have been widely used in weight-sensitive structures in many fields, especially in the transport industry. There are different classes of sandwiches with a wide range of materials and properties within each type. The aim of this article is the comparison of the impact strength between polymeric and aluminum sandwich structures. Impact tests were carried out by a drop test machine in order to investigate the structural response of the following different topologies of sandwich structures: PVC foam sandwiches and AFS panels. The failure mode and damage have been investigated using two experimental techniques: thermography and 3D Computed Tomography.
Abrate S.Impact on composite structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
2.
Ashby MF, Evans A., Fleck NA, Gibson LJ, Hutchinson JW and Wadley HNG.Metal foams: a design guide. Burlington: Butterworth Heinmann, 2000.
3.
Gibson LJ and Ashby MFCellular solids, 2nd ed. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1997 .
4.
Banhart J., Schmoll C. and Neumann U.Light-weight aluminium foam structures for ships. In: Faria L (ed.) Conference on Materials in Oceanic Environment (Euromat ’98). Vol. 1, Lisboa, Portugal, 1998, pp. 55-63.
5.
Baumeister J. , Banhart J. and Weber M.Aluminium foams for transport industry. Mater Design1997 ; 18(4): 217-220.
6.
Zhao H., Elnasri I. and Girard Y.Perforation of aluminium foam core sandwich panels under impact loading - an experimental study. Int J Impact Eng2007 ; 34: 1246-1257.
7.
Yu JL, Wang X., Wei ZG and Wang EHDeformation and failure mechanism of dynamically loaded sandwich beams with aluminium foam core. Int J Impact Eng2003 ; 28: 331-347.
8.
Crupi V., Guglielmino E., Risitano A. and Taylor D.Different methods for fatigue assessment of T welded joints used in ship structures . J Ship Res2007; 51(2): 150-159.
9.
Crupi V., Guglielmino E., Maestro M. and Marinò A.Fatigue analysis of butt welded AH36 steel joints: thermographic method and design S-N curve. Mar Struct2009; 22: 373-386.
10.
Audenino AL , Crupi V. and Zanetti EMThermoelastic and elastoplastic effects measured by means of a standard thermocamera. Exp Techniques2004; 28(2): 23-28.
11.
Santulli C.IR thermography study of the effect of molding parameters on impact resistance in E-glass / polypropylene commingled laminates . Nondestruct Test Eval2002; 35: 377-383.
12.
Olurin OB, Arnold M., Körner C. and Singer RFThe investigation of morphometric parameters of aluminium foams using micro-computed tomography. Mater Sci Eng2002 ; A328: 334-343.
13.
Wicklein M. and Thoma K.Numerical investigations of the elastic and plastic behavior of an open-cell aluminium foam. Mater Sci Eng2005; A397: 391-399.
14.
Schilling PJ , Karedla BR, Tatiparthi AK, Verges MA and Herrington PDX-ray computed microtomography of internal damage in fiber reinforced polymer matrix composites . Compos Sci Technol2005; 65(14): 2071-2078.
15.
Compston P. , Styles M. and Kalyanasundaram S.Low energy impact damage modes in aluminum foam and polymer foam sandwich structures . J Sandwich Struct Mater2006; 8: 365-379.
16.
Hazizan MA and Cantwell WJThe low velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich structures . Compos Part B2002; 33: 193-204.
17.
Mahfuz H., Al Mamum W. and Jeelani S.Effect of core density and implanted delamination on the high strain rate response of foam core sandwich composites. Sandwich Constr1997; 5: 597-606.
