Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Honeycomb sandwich panels of various skin thicknesses and core densities have been investigated under quasi-static loading in bending and indentation with both hemispherical (HS) and flat-ended (FE) indenters. Core crushing, top skin delamination, and top skin fracture are identified as major damage mechanisms. Their characteristics and energy-absorbing capabilities are established using load—displacement and load—strain curves and inspections of cross-sectioned specimens. The effects of varying skin thickness, core density and type, indenter nose shape, and boundary conditions on the damage and energy-absorbing characteristics are examined. The variation of the indenter nose shape is shown to induce a change in the damage mechanisms and have the most significant effect on energy absorption, especially for panels with relatively thicker skins. Increasing the skin thickness significantly increases not only the initial threshold and ultimate loads but also the absorbed energy (AE) of the panels. Increasing the core density has a very small effect on either the ultimate loads or the energy-absorbing capacity, while the effect of the support conditions on the damage and energy-absorbing characteristics is small. The larger 220 mm diameter panels absorb significantly more energy than the 100 mm diameter panels because of the much greater ultimate displacement. Different core materials with a similar density show little difference in either the damage or the energy-absorbing characteristics due to the limited contribution of transverse shear resistance. Panels with a delaminated top skin have lower threshold loads under both indenters and lower ultimate load for the HS indenter.

Keywords

sandwich panel honeycomb core damage mechanisms energy absorption.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kassapoglou, C. , Jonas, P.J. and Abbott, R. (1988). Compressive Strength of Composite Sandwich Panels after Impact Damage: An Experimental and Analytical Study, J. of Composite Technology and Research, 10: 65—73.

Tomblin, J. , Lacy, T. , Smith, B. , Hooper, S. , Vizzini, A. and Lee, S. (1999). Review of Damage Tolerance for Composite Sandwich Airframe Structures, Report DOT/FAA/ AR-99/49.

Bernard, M.L. and Lagace, P.A. (1989). Impact Resistance of Composite Sandwich Plates, J. of Thermoplastic Composite Materials , 8: 432—444.

Williamson, J.E. and Lagace, P.A. (1994). Response Mechanisms in the Impact of Graphite/Epoxy Honeycomb Sandwich Panels, In: Proc. of 8th American Society Conf. for Composites, pp. 287—297.

Tsotsis, T.K. and Lee, S.M. (1996). Characterisation of Localized Failure Modes in Honeycomb Sandwich Panels using Indentation, Composite Materials: Testing and Design, ASTM STP, 1274: 139—165.

Lee, S.M. and Tsotsis, T.K. (2000). Indentation Failure Behavior of Honeycomb Sandwich Panels, Composites Science and Technology, 60(8): 1147—1159.

Herup, E. and Palazotto, A.N. (1997). Low-velocity Impact Damage Initiation in Graphite/Epoxy/Nomex Honeycomb-Sandwich Plates, Composites Science and Technology , 57: 1581—1598.

Anderson, T. and Madenci, E. (2000). Experimental Investigation of Low-velocity Impact Characteristics of Sandwich Composites, Composite Structures , 50: 239—247.

Hoo Fatt, M.S. and Park, K.S. (2001). Dynamic Models for Low-velocity Impact Damage of Composite Sandwich Panels-Part B: Damage Initiation , Composite Structures, 52: 353—364.

10.

Hoo Fatt, M.S. and Park, K.S. (2001). Modelling Low-velocity Impact Damage of Composite Sandwich Panels, J. of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 3: 130—168.

11.

Raju, K.S. and Tomblin, J.S. (2001). Damage Characteristics in Sandwich Panels Subjected to Static Indentation using Spherical Indentors, AIAA-2001-1189, 103—111.

12.

Zhou, G. , Hill, M. , Loughlan, J. and Hookham, N. (2006). Damage Characteristics of Composite Honeycomb Sandwich Panels in Bending under Quasi-static Loading, J. of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 8(1): 55—90.

13.

Zhou, G. and Rivera, L.A. (2004). Investigation for the Reduction of In-plane Compressive Strength in Preconditioned Thin Composite Panels, J. of Composite Materials, 39(5): 391—422.

14.

Zhou, G. (1996). Static Behaviour and Damage of Thick Composite Laminates, Composite Structures, 36: 13—22.

15.

Wierzbicki, T. , Alvarez, A., de L. and Fatt , S.H. (1995). Impact Energy Absorption of Sandwich Plates with Crushable Core, in Impact, Waves, and Fracture, AMD-Vol. 205, 391—411.

Investigation of Parameters Governing the Damage and Energy Absorption Characteristics of Honeycomb Sandwich Panels

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References