Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Optimization of sandwich structures for strength to weight under conditions of relatively concentrated loading is surprisingly complex. In the present work, the specific question as to whether improvements in strength to weight of sandwich beams made with fiber composite faces and polymeric foam cores can result from making the loaded face thicker than the unloaded face is addressed. Tests on sandwich beams with foam cores are reported, along with results of analyses using an exact elasticity solution. The results show good agreement between prediction and measurement for the yield loads in the beam specimens. The analysis shows that if a sandwich beam has been optimized for strength to weight with equal face thickness, increasing the ratio of the thickness of the loaded face relative to the unloaded face does not significantly improve the strength. However, for other configurations, e.g. those designed to increase the stiffness of the beam at the expense of the strength, increasing the relative thickness of the loaded face results in significant increases in strength.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Gibson, L.J. (1984). Optimization of Stiffness in Sandwich Beams with Rigid Foam Cores , Mat. Sci. Eng., 67: 125–135 .

2. Triantafillou, T.C. and Gibson, L.J. (1987). Failure Mode Maps for Foam Core Sandwich Beams , Materials Sci. and Engineering, 95: 37–53 .

3. Triantafillou, T.C. and Gibson, L.J. (1987). Minimum Weight Design of Foam Core Sandwich Panels for a Given Strength , Materials Sci. and Enginering, 95: 55–62 .

4. Ueng, C.E.S. and Liu, T.L. (1979). Least Weight of a Sandwich Panel . In: Craig, R.R. (Ed.), Proceedings of ASCE Eng. Mech Div. 3rd Specialty Conf., pp. 41–44 , Univ of Texas at Austin, ASCE, New York.

5. Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F. (1997). Cellular Solids, Structure and Properties, 2nd Edn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge .

6. Olsson, K.A. (2000). ‘‘Sandwich Structures for Naval Ships: Design and Experience,’’ In: Rajapakse, Y.D.S. et al. (ed.), Mechanics of Sandwich Structures, Proc. ASME Ad Vol. 62, AMD Vol. 245, pp. 1–9.

7. Thomsen, O.T. (1993). Analysis of Local Bending Effects in Sandwich Plates with Orthotropic Face Layers Subjected to Localized Loading , Composite Structures, 25: 511–520 .

8. Thomsen, O.T. (1995). Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Local Bending Effects in Sandwith Plates , Composite Structures, 30: 85–101 .

9. Frostig, Y. et al. (1992). High-Order Theory for Sandwich-Beam Behavior with Transversely Flexible Core , J. Eng. Mech., 118: 1026–1043 .

10.

10. Frostig, Y. (1993). On Stress Concentration in the Bending of Sandwich Beams with Transversely Flexible Core , Composite Structures, 24: 161–169 .

11.

11. Frostig, Y. and Shenhar, I. (1995). High-Order Bending of Sandwich Beams with Transversely Flexible Core and Unsymmetrical Laminated Composite Skins , Composites Engineering, 5: 405–414 .

12.

12. Swanson, S.R. and Kim, J. (2000). Comparison of a Higher Order Theory for Sandwich Beams with Elasticity and Finite Element Analyses , Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 2: 33–49 .

13.

13. Pagano, N.J. (1970). Exact Solutions for Rectangular Bidirectional Composites and Sandwich Plates , Journal of Composite Materials, 4: 20–34 .

14.

14. Srinivas, S. and Rao, A.K. (1970). Bending, Vibration and Buckling of Simply Supported Thick Orthotropic Rectangular Plates and Laminates , Int. J. Solids Structures, 6: 1463–1481 .

15.

15. Swanson, S.R. (2000). Response of Orthotropic Sandwich Plates to Concentrated Loading , Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 2: 270–287 .

16.

16. Kim, J. and Swanson, S.R. (2001). Design of Sandwich Structures for Concentrated Loading , Composite Structures, 52: 365–373 .

17.

17. Swanson, S.R. and Kim, J. (2002). Optimization of Sandwich Beams for Concentrated Loads , Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 4: 273–293 .

18.

18. Kim, J. and Swanson, S.R. (2001). Failure Modes and Optimization of Sandwich Structures for Load Resistance , J. Composite Mtls (accepted).

19.

19. Christensen, R.M. and DeTeresa, S.J. (2000). ‘‘Failure Behavior of Closed Cell Foams,’’ In: Rajapakse, Y.D.S. et al. (ed.), Mechanics of Sandwich Structures, Proc. ASME Ad Vol. 62, AMD Vol. 245, pp. 117–122.

20.

20. Petras, A. and Sutcliffe, M.P.F. (1999). Indentation Resistance of Sandwich Beams , Composite Structures, 46: 413–424 .

21.

21. Kim, J. (2001). Design of Sandwich Beams for Concentrated Loading, PhD Dissertation, Dept of Mechanical Eng, Univ of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Effect of Unequal Face Thickness on Load Resistance of Sandwich Beams

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References