Fatigue Behavior of Foam Core Sandwich Beams with Sub-Interface Impact Damage

Abstract

The fatigue life of impact-damaged foam core sandwich beams with GFRP faces is investigated for constant load-amplitude cyclic loading. The damage produced by the low velocity/energy impact is characterised as a sub-interface cavity with surrounding crushed core whereas the face sheet is undamaged. The effect of bridging owing to the crushed core in the peripheral regions of impact damage, revealed in the preceding static study Shipsha et al. [1,2] is assessed under cyclic loading.

The fatigue test results are analysed in a stress-life S-N diagram and compared with published data from undamaged beams. The effect of two load ratios R = 0.1 and -1 is investigated. The fatigue threshold load levels are experimentally quantified from the S-N curves. Furthermore, a modified point-stress criterion based on the threshold stress intensity factor, K_th, is proposed to estimate the “no-crack growth” limit loads. The results show good agreement with performed experiments.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Shipsha, A. , Hallstrom, S. and Zenkert, D. (2003). Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 5(1): 7-31.

2. Shipsha, A. , Hallstrom, S. and Zenkert, D. (2003). Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 5(1): 33-51.

3. Triantafillou, T.C. and Gibson, L.J. (1989). Materials and Structures, 15: 266-276.

4. Carlsson, L.A. , Sendlein, S. and Merry, S.L. (1989). Journal of Composite Materials, 25(1): 101-116.

5. Zenkert, D. (1991). Journal of Composite Structures, 17: 331-350.

6. Thomson, R.S. , Shan Khan, M.Z. and Mouritz, A.P. (1998). Composite Structures, 42: 107-118.

7. Mouritz, A.P. and Thomson, R.S. (1999). Composite Structures, 44: 263-278.

8. Burman, M. and Zenkert, D. (1997). International Journal of Fatigue, 19(7): 551-561.

9. Burman, M. and Zenkert, D. (1997). International Journal of Fatigue, 19(7): 563-578.

10.

10. Clark, S.D. , Shenoi, R.A. and Allen, H.G. (1999). Composite Science and Technology, 59: 471-486.

11.

11. Shipsha, A. , Burman, M. and Zenkert, D. (1999). International Journal of Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 22: 123-131.

12.

12. Noble, F.W. and Lilley, J. (1981). Journal of Materials Science, 16: 1801-1808.

13.

13. Yau, S.S. and Mayer, G. (1986). Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, 78: 111-114.

14.

14. Shipsha, A. , Burman, M. and Zenkert, D. (2000). Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 2(2): 103-116.

15.

15. Olurin, O.B. , McCullough, K.Y.G. , Fleck, N.A. and Ashby, M.F. (2001). International Journal of Fatigue, 23: 375-382.

16.

16. ROHACELL (1987). Technical Manual. Rohm GmbH, Germany.

17.

17. Zenkert, D. (1995). An Introduction to Sandwich Construction, Chameleon Press Ltd., London.

18.

18. Weibull, W. (1961). Fatigue Testing and Analysis of Results, Pergamon Press, New York.

19.

19. Burman, M. (1998). Fatigue Crack Initiation and Propagation in Sandwich Structures. PhD Thesis, Department of Aeronautics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.