Failure Mechanisms and Modelling of Impact Damage in Sandwich Beams - A 2D Approach: Part II

Abstract

This study addresses the effect of low velocity impact damage on the post-impact residual strength and failure mechanisms of sandwich beams with Rohacell WF51 foam core. The considered impact damage has a form of a subinterface cavity surrounded by crushed core while the face sheet remains virtually undamaged. Part I of this study deals with experimental investigation of impact-damaged beams tested in transverse shear, bending and edgewise compression. It is shown that the crushed core and the bridging condition in the peripheral regions of the impact damage exert a significant effect on the post-impact critical loads and failure mechanisms.

In this paper, parameterised finite element (FE) models of impact damage with implemented crushed core properties are developed for numerical analyses of post-impact failure. In the analysis of the shear case, a model for II bridging condition in the peripheral regions of impact damage is introduced. A point-stress criterion is applied for predictions of failure loads and crack kink angle. Geometrically nonlinear FE analysis is employed for evaluation of critical loads for local buckling in the beams with impact damage. The FE analyses demonstrate good agreement with experimental results.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Shipsha, A. , Hallström, S. , Zenkert, D. (2002). Failure mechanisms and modelling of impact damage in sandwich beams - A 2D approach: Part I - experimental investigation. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 5(1): 5-29.

2. Abrate, S. (1997). Localised impact on sandwich structures with laminated facings. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 50(2): 69-82.

3. Wiese, M. , Echtermeyer, A.T. and Hayman, B. (1998). Evaluation of oblique impact damage on sandwich panels with PVC and balsa core materials. In: Olsson, K.-A. (ed.), Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Sandwich Construction, Vol. 2. pp. 807-818. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology, EMAS, UK.

4. Mouritz, A.P. and Thomson, R.S. (1999). Compression, flexure and shear properties of a sandwich composite containing defects. Composite Structures, 44: 263-278.

5. Thomson, R.S. , Shan Khan, M.Z. and Mouritz, A.P. (1998). Shear properties of a sandwich composite containing defects. Composite Structures, 42: 107-118.

6. Kosza, P. and Sayir, M.B. (1994). Failure patterns in the core of sandwich structures under impact loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 15(4): 501-517.

7. Mines, R.A.W. , Worralt, C.M. and Gibson, A.G. (1994). The static and impact behavior of polymer composite sandwich beams. Journal of Composites, 25(2): 95-110.

8. Olsson, R. (1997). Methodology for predicting the residual strength of impacted sandwich panels. Technical Report FFA TN 1997-09. Stockholm: The Aeronautical Research Institute of Sweden (FFA).

9. Niu, K. and Talreja, R. (1999). Buckling of a thin face layer on Winkler foundation with debonds. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 1: 259-278.

10.

10. Hansen, U. (1998). Compression behaviour of FRP sandwich specimens with interface debonds. Journal of Composite Materials, 32(4): 335-360.

11.

11. Nemes, J.A. and Simmonds, K.E. (1992). Low-velocity impact responses of foam-core sandwich composites. Journal of Composite Materials, 26(4): 500-519.

12.

12. Tsang, P.H.W. (1994). Impact resistance and damage tolerance of composite sandwich panels. PhD Thesis, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Cambridge, MA.

13.

13. Zenkert, D. (1995). An Introduction to Sandwich Construction. London: Chameleon Press Ltd.

14.

14. Andersson, B. , Falk, U. , Babuska, I. and von Petersdorff, T. (1995). Reliable stress and fracture mechanics analysis of complex components using a h-p version of FEM. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 38: 2135-2163.

15.

15. Massabò, R. and Cox, B.N. (1999). Concepts for bridged mode II delamination cracks. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 47: 1265-1300.

16.

16. Bueckner, H.F. (1973). Field singularity and related integral representations. In: Sih, G.C. (ed.), Fracture Mechanics. I. Methods of Analysis and Solutions of Crack Problems. Leyden: Noordhoof. pp. 239-314.

17.

17. Bueckner, H.F. (1958). The propagation of cracks and the energy of elastic deformation. Transactions of the ASME. pp. 1225-1230.

18.

18. Whitney, J.M. and Nuismer, R.J. (1974). Stress fracture criteria for laminated composites containing stress concentrations. Journal of Composite Materials, 8(7): 253-265.

19.

19. Grenestedt, J.L. , Hallström, S. and Kuttenkeuler, J. (1996). On cracks emanating from wedges in expanded PVC foam. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 54(4): 445-456.

20.

20. Hallström, S. and Grenestedt, J.L. (1998). Mixed mode fracture of cracks and wedge shaped notches in expanded PVC foam. International Journal of Fracture, 88(4): 343-358.

21.

21. Prasad, S. and Carlsson, L.A. (1994). Debonding and crack kinking in foam core sandwich beams - I. Analysis of fracture specimens. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 47(6): 813-824.

22.

22. Bathe, K.-J. (1996). Finite Element Procedures. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Failure Mechanisms and Modelling of Impact Damage in Sandwich Beams - A 2D Approach: Part II - Analysis and Modelling

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References