Response of Syntactic Foam Core Sandwich Structured Composites to Three-Point Bending

Abstract

Use of syntactic foams as core materials gives several distinct advantages over traditionally used core materials. Syntactic foams have an excellent combination of compressive strength, low density, low radar detectability and low moisture absorption coefficient among others. The present work aims at studying the behavior of sandwich-structured composites containing syntactic foam as core material under three-point bending conditions. Flexural and short-beam shear tests are conducted, where large (16: 1) and small (5: 1) aspect ratio (span length/thickness ratio) specimens are tested, respectively. It is observed that the specimen failure mode changes completely with the change in the aspect ratio. Specimens are found to fracture under the effect of shear stresses in the smaller aspect ratio specimens, whereas compressive stresses lead to the fracture in higher aspect ratio specimens. The observations of fracture features are correlated with the test data and the load-displacement curves obtained in the tests. A method of analysis is also presented for syntactic foams and the sandwich structures containing syntactic foam as core material.

Keywords

syntactic foam sandwich structure three-point bending span length short beam shear

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Vinson, J.R. (1999). The Behavior of Sandwich Structures of Isotropic and Composite Materials. Technomic Publishing Co., Inc.

2. Karlsson, K.F. and Astrom, T.B. (1997). Composites Part A, 28A: 97.

3. Noor, A.K. , Burton, S.W. and Bert, C.W. (1996). Appl Mech Rev., 49(3): 155-198.

4. Price, H.J. and Nelson, J.B. (1976). J. Composite Materials, 10: 314-317.

5. Puterman, M. , Narkis, M. and Kening, S. (1980). J. Cellular Plastics, 16(4): 223.

6. Hiel, C. , Dittman, D. and Ishai, O. (1993). Composites, 24(5): 447.

7. Shutov, F.A. (1991). Syntactic Polymeric Foams. In: Klempner, D. and Frisch, K.C. (eds.), Polymeric Foams. Carl Henser Verleg. pp. 355-374.

8. Gupta, N. , Karthikeyan, C.S. , Sankaran, S. and Kishore (1999). Materials Characterization, 43(4): 271-277.

9. Gupta N. , Kishore, Woldesenbet, E. and Sankaran, S. (2001). J. Mater Sci., 36: 4485-4491.

10.

10. Gupta, N. , Dwarakanath, A. , Murthy, C.R.L. , Sankaran, S. and Kishore (1998). J. Non-Destructive Evaluation, 18(3-4): 27-31.

11.

11. Anderson, L.L. and Farris, R.J. (1988). Polymer Engineering and Science, 28(8): 522-528.

12.

12. Liu, Z.H. , Li, J. , Liang, N.G. and Liu, H.Q. (1997). J. Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 16(16): 1523-1534.

13.

13. Voros, G. and Pukanszky, B. (1995). J. Materials Science, 30: 4171-4178.

14.

14. Papanicolaou, G.C. and Bakos, D. (February 1992). J. Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 11: 104-126.

15.

15. Wang, W. and Jasiuk, I. (1998). J. Composites Materials, 32(15): 1391-1524.

16.

16. Gupta, N. and Woldesenbet, E. (2001). Proceedings of ETCE, 17022.

17.

17. Wong, F.C. and Ait-Kadi, A. (1995). J. Applied Polymer Science, 55: 263-278.

18.

18. ASTM C393-94 : Standard test method for flexural properties of sandwich constructions. PA, USA: American Society for Testing of Materials.