Mechanical Properties and Fracture Characterization of Cross-Linked PVC Foams

Abstract

The tensile stress-strain response and fracture behavior of cross-linked PVC foams have been characterized over a range of foam densities from 36 to 400 kg/m³. The foams were found to be nearly isotropic. Young’s modulus, yield strength and fracture toughness data were compared to micro-structural relations derived for open and closed-cell foams. The failure process and stress strain response were indicative of brittle material behavior. Short gage length tension specimens bonded to aluminum loading blocks showed a tensile strength that increased with decreasing gage length as a result of improved support of the cell-walls of the foam under constrained lateral deformation. The plastic zone size for each of the fracture specimens, estimated from the von Mises yield criterion, was small indicating quasi-brittle failure. Testing of scaled single edged notch bend (SENB) fracture specimens revealed a toughness that decreases with decreasing specimen size.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Zenkert D. (1997). An Introduction to Sandwich Construction. London: EMAS.

2. Hallstrom, S. , Shipsha, A. and Zenkert, D. (2000). Failure of impact damaged foam core sandwich beams. In: Mechanics of Sandwich Structures. AD-Vol. 62/AMD-Vol. 245. ASME. pp. 11-19.

3. Sun, C.T. and Turaga U.V.R.S. (2000). Compressive and tensile characteristics of sandwich T-joints. Proc. of 5th International Conference on Sandwich Construction, Zurich, 5-7 Sept.

4. Gibson, L.H. and Ashby, M.F. (1997). Cellular Solids - Structure and Properties, 2nd Edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

5. Zenkert, D. (1987). Damage Tolerance of foam core sandwich constructions. Ph.D. Dissertation. The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

6. Zenkert, D and Backlund, J. (1989). PVC sandwich core materials: mode I fracture toughness. Compos. Sci. Tech., 34: 225-242.

7. Stibe, M. (1992). Fracture toughness of divinycell H100, H130 and H200, Barracuda Technologies Report, Laholm, Sweden, TR 91-44.

8. Bull, P.H. , Hallstrom, S. and Olsson, K.A. (1998). Mechanical properties of 50 mm thick divinycell H200. Royal Institute of Tech., Report S98-04, Stockholm, Sweden.

9. Shipsha, A. , Burman, M. and Zenkert, D. (2000). On mode I fatigue crack growth in foam core materials for sandwich structures. J. Sandwich Stuct. Mater., 2: 103-116.

10.

10. Zvanik, M. (2000). Shear properties of structural polymer foams: ultimate stress or primarily yield for design? Proc. of 5th International Conference on Sandwich Construction, Zurich. pp. 5-7.

11.

11. ASTM Standard : D 1623-78, Standard test method for tensile and tensile adhesion properties of rigid cellular plastics, (1993). Vol. 08-01.

12.

12. ASTM Standard : D5045-93, standard test method for plane-strain fracture toughness and strain energy release rate of plastic materials, (1993). Vol. 08.03.

13.

13. Ozdil, F. and Carlsson, L.A. (1992). Plastic zone estimates in mode I interlaminar fracture of interleaved composites. Eng. Fract. Mech., 41(5): 645-658.

14.

14. Divinycell, Technical Specification - H grade, Divinycell International AB, Laholm, Sweden.

15.

15. Gibson, L.J. , Ashby, M.F. , Schajer, J.S. and Robetson, C.I. (1982). The mechanics of three-dimensional cellular materials. Proc. Royal Soc. London, Vol. 382, pp. 43-59.

16.

16. Ewalds, H.L. and Wanhill R.J.H. (1989). Fracture Mechanics. London: Edward Arnold.

17.

17. Broberg, K.B. (1999). Cracks and Fracture. San Diego: Academic Press.

18.

18. Maiti, S.K. , Ashby, M.F. and Gibson, L.J. (1984). Fracture toughness of brittle cellular solids. Scripta Metallurgica, 18: 213-217.