Modelling of Crushing Due to Impact in Honeycomb Sandwiches

Abstract

Because of high stiffness and strength to weight ratios, composite sandwiches are being used increasingly, especially in aerospace applications. The main drawback of sandwich components is their relatively low resistance to impact damage and the extent to which their strength is reduced under compressive loading after impact. As part of a wider study aimed at increasing the impact resistance of sandwich panels, a continuum damage model is proposed. The model developed describes the compressive behaviour of honeycombs made from materials that are prone to elastic buckling. The material behaviour in compression is described by a combination of three distinct constitutive models, namely elastic, elastic continuum damage and an inelastic strain accumulation model. This has been interfaced with a commercial finite element package to model soft body impacts onto a minimum gauge honeycomb core sandwich. Results from analysis are compared to experimental data and the correlation is found to be very good.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Minguet, P. J. (1991). A Model for Predicting the Behaviour of Impact Damaged Minimum Gage Sandwich Panels Under Compression. J. AIAA 91-1075-CP pp. 1112-1122.

2. Chang, F. K. , Choi, H. Y. and Wang, H. S. (1 990). Damage of Laminated Composites Due to Low Velocity Impact. Proceedings of the 31st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Long Beach, CA.

3. Kassapoglou, C. and Abbott, R. (1988). A Correlation Parameter for Predicting the Compressive Strength of Composite Sandwich Panels After Low Speed Impact. Proceedings 29th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Williamsburg VA.

4. Aitken, R. , Horrigan, D. and Moltschaniwskyj, G. , Impacting Thin Skinned Composite Sandwich Laminates, Proceedings of 19th Symposium of the International Committee on Aeronautical Fatigue, 18-20 June 1997, Edinburgh, Scotland.

5. Wierzbicki, T. , Alvarez, A. and Hoo Fatt, M. S. (1995). Impact Energy Absorption of Sandwich Plates with Crushable Core. ASME AMD 205 Impact, Waves and Fracture pp. 391-411, NY USA.

6. Eggers, H. (1995). Modelling of Damage in Sandwich Structures After Impact. Proceedings, Sandwich Construction 3, Southampton. pp. 755-768.

7. Ashby, M. F. and Gibson, L. J. (1998). Cellular Solids-Structure and Properties. Pergamon Press, U.K.

8. Lemaitre, J. and Chaboche, J-L. (1994). The Mechanics of Solid Materials. Cambridge University Press, U.K.

9. Lemaitre, J. (1996). A Course on Damage Mechanics. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

10.

10. LUSAS Theory Manual Part 1. FEA Ltd., Kingston Upon Thames, Surrey, U.K.

11.

11. Simo, J. C. and Wu, J. W. (1987). Strain and Stress Based Continuum Damage Models I Formulation. International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol 23, no. 7.

12.

12. Simo, J. C. and Wu, J. W. (1987). Strain and Stress Based Continuum Damage Models 2 Computational Aspects. International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 23, no. 7.