Gunshot detection systems are defined as technologically advanced acoustic sensing systems capable of identifying, discriminating and reporting gun shots within one second of a shot being fired. Manufacturers of gunshot detection systems propose that the technology can significantly decrease officer response times to random gunfire calls for service as well as indi rectly control random gunfire problems. Our paper examines some of the organizational imphcations of using gunshot detection systems in local law enforcement agencies. Drawing from a two-month field trial of a gun shot detection system implemented in Dallas, Tex., our paper explores the impact of the technology on officer response times and officer workloads. Our results suggest that implementation of gunshot detection technology in Dallas reduced officer response times by about one minute (7% reduc tion) yet significantly increased officer workloads.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Dallas Police Department.1993. Dallas Police Department State Gunfire Reduction Proposal. Dallas Police Department.
2.
Dixon, D.R. and M.A. Stallo.1996. "False Alarms in Dallas." Texas Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics Program.
3.
Egan, T.1996. "Police Surveillance of Streets Turns to Video Cameras and Listening Devices." New York Times. February 7.
4.
Frank J., S. Brandl and R.C. Watkins.1997. "The Content of Community Policing: A Comparison of the Daily Activities of Community and 'Beat' Officers." Policing: An International Journal of Police Management and Strategies.20(4): 749-765.
5.
Gilsinan, J.F.1989. "They is Clowning Tough: 911 and the Social Construction of Reality." Criminology. Vol.27(3): 329-344.
6.
Goldstein, H.1990. Problem-Oriented Policing. New York : McGraw-Hill.
7.
Kass, J.1995. "Police Aim to Silence Celebratory Guns at New Year's ." Los Angeles Times. December 17, Section B, pp. 1, 13.
8.
Kennedy, D., A. Piehl and A. Braga.1996. Juvenile Gun Violence and Gun Markets in Boston. Unpublished manuscript.
9.
Kleck, G.1991. Point Blank: Guns and Violence in America. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
10.
Klinger, D. and G. Bridges.1997. "Measurement Error in Calls-for-Service as an Indicator of Crime." Criminology.35: 705-726.
11.
Maguire, K. and A. L. Pastore. (eds.) 1997. Sourcebook of Crimanal Justice Statistics. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics: Washington D.C.
12.
Manning, P.K.1992. "Information Technologies and the Police" in Michael H. Tonry and Norval Morris (eds) Modern Policing. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
13.
Manson, D. and G. Lauver.1997. Presale Firearm Checks: A National Estimate . Washington, D.C: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
14.
Mazerolle, L. Green and J. Frank.1996. 'A Field Evaluation of the System for the Effective Control of Urban Environment Security (SE-CURES™." Proposal submitted to the National Institute of Justice.
15.
Mazerolle, L. Green, J. Frank, D. Rogan, R.C. Watkins and C. Kadleck.1997. Field Evaluation of the System for the Effective Control of Urban Environment Security (SECURES™). Final Report to the National Institute of Justice. Cincinnati , Ohio University of Cincinnati.
16.
Mazerolle, L. Green, J. Frank, D. Rogan and R.C. Watkins.1998. A Field Evaluation of the ShotSpotter Gunshot Location System: Report on the Redwood City Field Trial. Final Report to the National Institute of Justice. Cincinnati, Ohio : University of Cincinnati.
17.
McEwen, J.T., E.F. Connors and M.I. Cohen.1984. Evaluation of the Differential Police Response Field Test: Executive Summary. U.S. Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice: Washington D.C.
18.
Page, E. and B. Sharkey.1995. SECURES™ for Reporting Gunshots in Urban Environments. Alliant Techsystems Inc.
19.
Reiss, A.J. Jr.1971. Police and the Public. New Haven, Conn.Yale University Press.
20.
Reiss, A.J., Jr. and J.A. Roth. (eds.) 1993. Understanding and Preventing Violence. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
21.
Scott, E.J.1981. Calls for Service: Citizen Demand and Initial Police Response . Washington, D.C: National Institute of Justice.
22.
Sherman, L.W.1989. "Repeat Calls for Service: Policing the 'Hot Spots "' in Dennis Jay Kenney (ed.) Police and Policing: Contemporary Issues. New York: Praeger.
23.
Sherman L. and D. Rogan.1995. "Effects of Gun Seizures on Gun Violence : 'Hot Spots' Patrol in Kansas City." Justice Quarterly.12(4): 673-693.
24.
Sherman L. and D. Weisburd.1995. "General Deterrent Effects of Police Patrol in Crime 'Hot Spots': A Randomized, Controlled Trial." Justice Quarterly. 12(4): 625-648.
25.
Showen, R.1996. Report on the Gunshot Location System Phase I trials: 2-11 April, 1996. Los Altos, Calif.: Trilon Technologies.
26.
Sparrow, M.K., M.H. Moore and D. Kennedy.1990. Beyond 911: A New Era for Policing . New York: Basic Books.
27.
Spelman, W. and D.K. Brown.1984. Calling the Police: Citizen Reporting of Serious Crime. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
28.
Telemasp Bulletin. 1996. Texas Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics Program. Vol. 3 (1): 5.
29.
Warner, B.D. and G.L. Pierce.1993. "Reexamining Social Disorganization Theory Using Calls to the Police as a Measure of Crime." Criminology.31:493-518.
30.
Weisburd, D. and L. Green.1995. "Policing Drug Hot Spots: Findings from the Jersey City DMA Experiment." Justice Quarterly.12(4): 711-736.
31.
Wilson, J.Q.1976. Varieties of Police Behavior: The Management of Law and Order in Eight Communities. NYAtheneum.
32.
Wright, J.D.1995. "Ten Essential Observations on Guns in America ." Society March/April: 63-68.
