Real-time crime hot spot forecasting presents challenges to policing. There is a high volume of hot spot misclassifications and a lack of theoretical support for forecasting algorithms, especially in disciplines outside the fields of criminology and criminal justice. Transparency is particularly important as most hot spot forecasting models do not provide their underlying mechanisms. To address these challenges, we operationalize two different theories in our algorithm to forecast crime hot spots over Portland and Cincinnati. First, we use a population heterogeneity framework to find places that are consistent hot spots. Second, we use a state dependence model of the number of crimes in the time periods prior to the predicted month. This algorithm is implemented in Excel, making it extremely simple to apply and completely transparent. Our forecasting models show high accuracy and high efficiency in hot spot forecasting in both Portland and Cincinnati context. We suggest previously developed hot spot forecasting models need to be reconsidered.
Al BoniM.GerberM. S. (2016, December). Automatic optimization of localized kernel density estimation for hotspot policing. In 2016 15th IEEE international conference on machine learning and applications (ICMLA) (pp. 32–38). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
2.
ArbousA. G.KerrichJ. E. (1951).
Accident statistics and the concept of accident-proneness.Biometrics,
7(4), 340–432.
3.
ArulampalamW.BhalotraS. (2006).
Sibling death clustering in India: State dependence versus unobserved heterogeneity. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society),
169(4), 829–848.
4.
BatesG. E.NeymanJ. (1952).
Contribution to the theory of accident Proneness. 2: True of false contagion. University of California Publications in Statistics, 1, 255–276.
5.
BowersK. J.JohnsonS. D.PeaseK. (2004).
Prospective hot-spotting: The future of crime mapping?British Journal of Criminology,
44(5), 641–658.
6.
BrantinghamP. L.BrantinghamP. J. (1993).
Environment, routine and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. Advances in Criminological Theory,
5(2), 259–294.
7.
BrillingerD. R. (1988).
Some statistical methods for random process data from seismology and neurophysiology.The Annals of Statistics,
16(1), 1–54.
8.
CaplanJ. M.KennedyL. W. (2013). Risk terrain modeling diagnostics utility (Version 1.0).
Newark, NJ:
Rutgers Center on Public Security.
9.
CaplanJ. M.KennedyL. W.MillerJ. (2011).
Risk terrain modeling: Brokering criminological theory and GIS methods for crime forecasting.Justice Quarterly,
28(2), 360–381.
10.
ChaineyS.RatcliffeJ. (2013). GIS and crime mapping.
London, England:
Wiley.
11.
ChaineyS.TompsonL.UhligS. (2008).
The utility of hotspot mapping for predicting spatial patterns of crime.Security Journal,
21(1–2), 4–28.
12.
CohenJ.GorrW. L.OlligschlaegerA. M. (2007).
Leading indicators and spatial interactions: A crime-forecasting model for proactive police deployment.Geographical Analysis,
39(1), 105–127.
CorcoranJ. J.WilsonI. D.WareJ. A. (2003).
Predicting the geo-temporal variations of crime and disorder.International Journal of Forecasting,
19(4), 623–634.
15.
DeadmanD. (2003).
Forecasting residential burglary.International Journal of Forecasting,
19(4), 567–578.
16.
FarrellG. (2005). Progress and prospects in the prevention of repeat victimization. In N. Tilley (Ed.), Handbook of crime prevention and community safety (pp. 143–170). Cullompton, UK: Willan.
17.
FelsonM.PoulsenE. (2003).
Simple indicators of crime by time of day.International Journal of Forecasting,
19(4), 595–601.
18.
FergusonA. G. (2012).
Predictive policing and reasonable suspicion.Emory Law Journal,
62(2), 259–325.
19.
FlaxmanS.ChiricoM.PereiraP.LoefflerC. (2018). Scalable high-resolution forecasting of sparse spatiotemporal events with kernel methods: A winning solution to the NIJ “Real-Time Crime Forecasting Challenge”. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.02858. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.02858.pdf
20.
GorrW.HarriesR. (2003).
Introduction to crime forecasting.International Journal of Forecasting,
19(4), 551–555.
21.
GorrW. L.LeeY. (2012, June). Longitudinal study of crime hot spots: Dynamics and impact on part 1 violent crime. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on Forecasting, Boston, MA.
22.
GorrW. L.LeeY. (2015).
Early warning system for temporary crime hot spots.Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
31(1), 25–47.
23.
GorrW. L.LeeY. (2017). Chronic and temporary crime hot spots. In WeisburdD.EckJ. E. (Eds.), Unraveling the crime-place connection: New directions in theory and policy—Advances in criminological theory (pp. 41–63).
New Brunswick, NJ:
Transaction Publishers.
24.
GorrW.OlligschlaegerA. (2002). Crime hot spot forecasting: Modeling and comparative evaluation (Final project report). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
25.
GorrW.OlligschlaegerA.ThompsonY. (2003).
Short-term forecasting of crime.International Journal of Forecasting,
19(4), 579–594.
26.
GroffE. R.La VigneN. G. (2002).
Forecasting the future of predictive crime mapping.Crime Prevention Studies,
13, 29–58.
27.
HarriesR. (2003).
Modelling and predicting recorded property crime trends in England and Wales—A retrospective.International Journal of Forecasting,
19(4), 557–566.
28.
HeckmanJ. J.BorjasG. J. (1980).
Does unemployment cause future unemployment? Definitions, questions and answers from a continuous time model of heterogeneity and state dependence.Economica,
47(187), 247–283.
29.
HuntJ. M. (2016). Do crime hot spots move? Exploring the effects of the modifiable areal unit problem and modifiable temporal unit problem on crime hot spot stability (Doctoral dissertation). American University, Washington, DC.
30.
HuntJ. (2018).
NIJ’s real-time crime forecasting challenge: An attempt to encourage data scientists from every field to think about criminal justice problems. AMSTAT News: The Membership Magazine of the American Statistical Association, (487), 5–7.
31.
JohnsonS. D. (2008).
Repeat burglary victimisation: A tale of two theories.Journal of Experimental Criminology,
4(3), 215–240.
LeeY. J.OS. (2019). Flag and boost theories for hot spot forecasting: An application of NIJ’s real-time crime forecasting algorithm using Colorado Springs crime data. International Journal of Police Science & Management. doi:10.1177/1461355719864367
35.
LiuH.BrownD. E. (2003).
Criminal incident prediction using a point-pattern-based density model.International Journal of Forecasting,
19(4), 603–622.
36.
MadensenT. D.EckJ. E. (2008).
Violence in bars: Exploring the impact of place manager decision-making.Crime Prevention and Community Safety,
10(2), 111–125.
37.
MartinezN. N.LeeY.EckJ. E.OS. (2017).
Ravenous wolves revisited: A systematic review of offending concentration. Crime Science,
6(1), 10.
38.
MitchellM. B.BrownD. E.ConklinJ. H. (2007, April). A crime forecasting tool for the web-based crime analysis toolkit. In 2007 IEEE systems and information engineering design symposium (pp. 1–5). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
39.
MohlerG. (2014).
Marked point process hotspot maps for homicide and gun crime prediction in Chicago.International Journal of Forecasting,
30(3), 491–497.
40.
MohlerG.PorterM. D. (2017). Rotational grid, PAI-maximizing crime forecasts (Report no. 251203, National Institute of Justice (NIJ)). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/251203.pdf
41.
MohlerG.PorterM. D. (2018).
Rotational grid, PAI-maximizing crime forecasts. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal,
11(5), 227–236.
42.
MohlerG. O.ShortM. B.BrantinghamP. J.SchoenbergF. P.TitaG. E. (2011).
Self-exciting point process modeling of crime. Journal of the American Statistical Association,
106(493), 100–108.
43.
MohlerG. O.ShortM. B.MalinowskiS.JohnsonM.TitaG. E.BertozziA. L., . . .BrantinghamP. J. (2015).
Randomized controlled field trials of predictive policing. Journal of the American Statistical Association,
110(512), 1399–1411.
44.
NaginD. S.LandK. C. (1993).
Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model.Criminology,
31(3), 327–362.
45.
NaginD.PaternosterR. (2000).
Population heterogeneity and state dependence: State of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
16(2), 117–144.
46.
OS.MartinezN. N.LeeY.EckJ. E. (2017).
How concentrated is crime among victims? A systematic review from 1977 to 2014.Crime Science,
6(1), 9.
47.
OgataY.AkaikeH.KatsuraK. (1982).
The application of linear intensity models to the investigation of causal relations between a point process and another stochastic process. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics,
34(2), 373–387.
48.
PeaseK. (1998). Repeat victimisation: Taking stock (
Vol. 90).
London, England:
Home Office Police Research Group.
49.
RatcliffeJ. H. (2004).
Geocoding crime and a first estimate of a minimum acceptable hit rate.International Journal of Geographical Information Science,
18(1), 61–72.
50.
RatcliffeJ. H.RengertG. F. (2008).
Near-repeat patterns in Philadelphia shootings. Security Journal,
21(1–2), 58–76.
51.
RatcliffeJ. H.TaylorR. B.PerenzinA. (2016). Predictive modeling combining short and long-term crime risk potential (Final report). U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
ShermanL. W. (1995).
Hot spots of crime and criminal careers of places.Crime and Place,
4, 35–52.
54.
SullivanC. M.O’KeeffeZ. P. (2017).
Evidence that curtailing proactive policing can reduce major crime.Nature Human Behaviour,
1(10), 730–737.
55.
TownsleyM.HomelR.ChaselingJ. (2003).
Infectious burglaries. A test of the near repeat hypothesis.British Journal of Criminology,
43(3), 615–633.
56.
TseloniA.PeaseK. (2015).
Area and individual differences in personal crime victimization incidence: The role of individual, lifestyle/routine activities and contextual predictors.International Review of Victimology,
21(1), 3–29.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
