This study evaluated the Dayton Foot Patrol Program (DFPP). The DFPP spanned 28 weeks. During the DFPP, patrol officers were asked to conduct foot patrol in six hot spots located in the downtown business district for at least 2 hours a day but used their discretion to determine when, which hot spot, how long, and in which ways to patrol. On average, roughly 9 hours of foot patrol were conducted each day during the DFPP. Pre–post comparison statistics and pooled time series count regression models were estimated. The DFPP was linked to reductions in total crime in initial analyses, but only disorder crime incidents were statistically significantly reduced once the outcome was disaggregated into crime-specific outcomes. A diffusion of crime control benefits to nearby areas was also observed. The study’s implications are that foot patrol can be implemented with fewer personnel resources and still produce crime reductions in downtown business districts.
AndresenM. A.LauK. C. (2014).
An evaluation of police foot patrol in Lower Lonsdale, British Columbia.Police Practice and Research,
15(6), 476–489.
2.
ArielB.WeinbornC.ShermanL. W. (2016).
“Soft” policing at hot spots—Do police community support officers work? A randomized controlled trial.Journal of Experimental Criminology,
12(3), 277–317.
3.
AustinP. C. (2009).
Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity‐score matched samples.Statistics in Medicine,
28(25), 3083–3107.
4.
BerkR.MacDonaldJ. (2010).
Policing the homeless: An evaluation of efforts to reduce homeless‐related crime.Criminology & Public Policy,
9(4), 813–840.
5.
BowersW. J.HirschJ. H. (1987).
The impact of foot patrol staffing on crime and disorder in Boston: An unmet promise. American Journal of Police,
6, 17–44.
6.
BowersK. J.JohnsonS. D. (2003).
Measuring the geographical displacement and diffusion of benefit effects of crime prevention activity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
19(3), 275–301.
7.
BragaA. A.HureauD. M.PapachristosA. V. (2011).
An ex post facto evaluation framework for place-based police interventions. Evaluation Review,
35(6), 592–626.
8.
BragaA. A.KennedyD. M.WaringE. J.PiehlA. M. (2001).
Problem-oriented policing, deterrence, and youth violence: An evaluation of Boston’s operation ceasefire.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,
38(3), 195–225.
9.
BragaA. A.PapachristosA. V.HureauD. M. (2014).
The effects of hot spots policing on crime: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Justice Quarterly,
31(4), 633–663.
10.
BruecknerJ. K. (2000).
Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies.International Regional Science Review,
23(2), 160–171.
11.
BuntingT.FilionP.FrenetteS.CurryD.MatticeR. (2000).
Housing strategies for downtown revitalization in mid-size cities: A City of Kitchener feasibility study. Canadian Journal of Urban Research,
9(2), 145–175.
12.
CameronA. C.TrivediP. K. (2013). Regression analysis of count data, 2nd edition.
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press.
13.
City of Dayton. (2017). 2017 Dayton survey final report.
Dayton, OH:
City of Dayton.
14.
CorsaroN. (2013).
The high point drug market intervention: Examining impact across target areas and offense types.Victims & Offenders,
8(4), 416–445.
15.
CorsaroN.BrunsonR. K.McGarrellE. F. (2010).
Evaluating a policing strategy intended to disrupt an illicit street-level drug market.Evaluation Review,
34(6), 513–548.
EsbensenF. (1987). Foot patrols: Of what value? American Journal of Police,
6, 45–65.
18.
FarringtonD. P.GillM.WaplesS. J.ArgomanizJ. (2007).
The effects of closed-circuit television on crime: Meta-analysis of an English national quasi-experimental multi-site evaluation.Journal of Experimental Criminology,
3(1), 21–38.
19.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2004). Uniform crime reporting handbook.
Washington, DC:
US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.
20.
Greater Downtown Dayton Plan. (2010). Priority recommendations.
Dayton, OH:
City of Dayton.
21.
Greater Downtown Dayton Plan. (2017). 2017 Progress at a glance.
Dayton, OH:
City of Dayton.
22.
GreenbergD. F.RoushJ. B. (2009).
The effectiveness of an electronic security management system in a privately owned apartment complex.Evaluation Review,
33(1), 3–26.
23.
GroffE. R.RatcliffeJ. H.HabermanC. P.SorgE. T.JoyceN. M.TaylorR. B. (2015).
Does what police do at hot spots matter? The Philadelphia Policing Tactics Experiment.Criminology,
53(1), 23–53.
24.
GueretteR. T. (2009). Analyzing crime displacement and diffusion.
Washington, DC:
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
25.
GuoS.FraserM. (2015). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications, 2nd edition.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications, Inc.
26.
HabermanC. P. (2017).
Overlapping hot spots? An examination of the spatial heterogeneity of hot spots of different crime types.Criminology & Public Policy,
16(2), 633–660.
27.
HabermanC. P.GroffE. R.RatcliffeJ. H.SorgE. T. (2016).
Satisfaction with police in violent crime hot spots: Using community surveys as a guide for selecting hot spots policing tactics.Crime & Delinquency,
62(4), 525–557.
28.
HinkleJ. C.WeisburdD.FamegaC.ReadyJ. (2013).
The problem is not just sample size: The consequences of low base rates in policing experiments in smaller cities.Evaluation Review,
37(3–4), 213–238.
29.
KellingG. L.PateT.DieckmanD.BrownC. E. (1981). The Newark Foot Patrol Experiment: A summary report.
Washington, DC:
Police Foundation.
30.
KlockarsC. B. (1985). The ideal of police.
Newbury Park, CA:
Sage Publications, Inc.
31.
KoperC. S. (1995).
Just enough police presence: Reducing crime and disorderly behavior by optimizing patrol time in crime hot spots.Justice Quarterly,
12(4), 649–672.
32.
KoperC. S. (2014).
Assessing the practice of hot spots policing: Survey results from a national convenience sample of local police agencies.Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice,
30(2), 123–146.
33.
LippertR. (2007).
Urban revitalization, security, and knowledge transfer: The case of broken windows and kiddie bars.Canadian Journal of Law & Society,
22(2), 29–53.
34.
LongJ. S.FreeseJ. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata. College Station,
TX:
Stata Press.
35.
McClearyR.McDowallD.BartosB. (2017). Design and analysis of time series experiments.
Oxford, England:
Oxford University Press.
36.
MieszkowskiP.MillsE. S. (1993).
The causes of metropolitan suburbanization.Journal of Economic Perspectives,
7(3), 135–147.
37.
MitchellJ. (2001).
Business improvement districts and the “new” revitalization of downtown.Economic Development Quarterly,
15(2), 115–123.
NovakK. J.FoxA. M.CarrC. M.SpadeD. A. (2016).
The efficacy of foot patrol in violent places.Journal of Experimental Criminology,
12(3), 465–475.
40.
PateA. (1981). Evaluation designs and hypotheses. In The Police Foundation (Ed.), The Newark Foot Patrol Experiment (pp. 15–20).
Washington, DC:
Police Foundation.
41.
PateA.FerraraA.KellingG. L. (1981). Patrol: A discussion of issues. In The Police Foundation (Ed.), The Newark Foot Patrol Experiment (pp. 9–14).
Washington, DC:
Police Foundation.
42.
PateA.WillsonV.KellingG. L. (1981). Reported crime in Newark and Elizabeth and arrests in Newark. In The Police Foundation (Ed.), The Newark Foot Patrol Experiment (pp. 43–50).
Washington, DC:
Police Foundation.
43.
PhillipsS. W.WheelerA.KimD. (2016).
The effect of police paramilitary unit raids on crime at micro-places in Buffalo, New York.International Journal of Police Science & Management,
18(3), 206–219.
44.
PizaE. L.O’HaraB. A. (2014).
Saturation foot-patrol in a high-violence area: A quasi-experimental evaluation.Justice Quarterly,
31(4), 693–718.
45.
President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967). Task force report: The police.
Washington, DC:
US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
46.
RatcliffeJ. H. (2004).
Geocoding crime and a first estimate of a minimum acceptable hit rate.International Journal of Geographical Information Science,
18(1), 61–72.
47.
RatcliffeJ. H.SorgE. T. (2017). Foot patrol: Rethinking the cornerstone of policing.
New York, NY:
Springer.
48.
RatcliffeJ. H.TaniguchiT.GroffE. R.WoodJ. D. (2011).
The Philadelphia Foot Patrol Experiment: A randomized controlled trial of police patrol effectiveness in violent crime hot spots.Criminology,
49(3), 795–831.
49.
ReppettoT. A. (1976).
Crime prevention and the displacement phenomenon.Crime & Delinquency,
22(2), 166–177.
50.
RosenbaumD. P. (2006). The limits of hot spots policing. In WeisburdD.BragaA. A. (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives (pp. 245–263).
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press.
51.
SchnellC.BragaA. A.PizaE. L. (2017).
The influence of community areas, neighborhood clusters, and street blocks on the spatial variability of violent crime in Chicago.Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
33(3), 469–496.
52.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference (2nd ed.).
Boston, MA:
Houghton Mifflin Company.
53.
ShermanL. W. (1998). Evidence-based policing. Ideas in policing.
Washington, DC:
Police Foundation.
54.
ShermanL. W.GartinP. R.BuergerM. E. (1989).
Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology,27(1), 27–56.
55.
ShermanL. W.RoganD. P. (1995).
Effects of gun seizures on gun violence: “Hot spots” patrol in Kansas City.Justice Quarterly,
12(4), 673–693.
56.
ShermanL. W.WeisburdD. (1995).
General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial.Justice Quarterly,
12(4), 625–648.
57.
SorgE. T.HabermanC. P.RatcliffeJ. H.GroffE. R. (2013).
Foot patrol in violent crime hot spots: The longitudinal impact of deterrence and posttreatment effects of displacement.Criminology,
51(1), 65–101.
58.
SorgE. T.WoodJ. D.GroffE. R.RatcliffeJ. H. (2014).
Boundary adherence during place-based policing evaluations: A research note. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,
51(3), 377–393.
59.
TaylorR. B. (1997).
Order and disorder of streetblocks and neighborhoods: Ecology, microecology and the systemic model of social organization.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,
34(1), 113–115.
60.
TelepC. W.MitchellR. J.WeisburdD. (2014).
How much time should the police spend at crime hot spots? Answers from a police agency directed randomized field trial in Sacramento, California.Justice Quarterly,
31(5), 905–933.
61.
TrojanowiczR. C. (1982). An evaluation of the Neighborhood Foot Patrol Program in Flint, Michigan.
East Lansing, MI:
Michigan State University.
62.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). American community survey, 2016 5 year estimates.
Washington, DC:
Author.
63.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). 2015 American community survey 5 year block group estimates.
Washington, DC:
Author.
64.
UtneM.PateA.FerraraA.KellingG. L. (1981). Effects of experiment on attitudes and victimization. In The Police Foundation (Ed.), The Newark Foot Patrol Experiment (pp. 51–90).
Washington, DC:
Police Foundation.
65.
WeisburdD. (2015).
The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place.Criminology,
53(2), 133–157.
66.
WeisburdD.BragaA. A. (2006). Hot spots policing as a model for police innovation. In WeisburdD.BragaA. A. (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives (pp. 225–244).
Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.
67.
WeisburdD.EckJ. E. (2004).
What can police do to reduce crime, disorder and fear?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
593(1), 42–65.
68.
WelshB.FarringtonD. P. (2009). Making public places safer.
New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
