The current study aimed to enhance the understanding of how law enforcement agencies collaborate with parole agencies and how they view police-parole partnerships. The data were collected through a state-wide survey of all sheriffs’ offices and a random sample of municipal police departments in Texas, the state with the nation’s largest parole population. The primary research question focused on identifying (1) empirically derived and meaningful patterns of police-parole partnerships and (2) the predictors of the perception among law enforcement agencies with regard to partnerships with parole agencies. The main finding was that police agencies who valued partnerships with parole agencies tended to already be involved in collaborations with parole agencies and had an organizational culture which supported working with other agencies.
AdamsR. E.RoheW. M.ArcuryT. A. (2002). Implementing community-oriented policing: Organizational change and street officer attitudes. Crime and Delinquency, 48, 399-430.
2.
BeekunR.GlickW. (2001). Development and test of a contingency framework of coupling: Assessing the covariation between structure and culture. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37, 385-407.
3.
BetoD. R. (2005, Summer). Probation partnerships: Insights from the past, a view of the present, and a call for leadership. Executive Exchange, 8-11.
4.
BurkeP. B. (2001). Collaboration for successful prisoner re-entry: The role of parole and the courts. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5, 11-22.
5.
BurkeP.TonryM. (2006). Successful transition and reentry for safer communities: A call to action for parole. Silver Spring, MD: Center for Effective Public Policy.
6.
BurrellW. D. (2005). Trends in probation and parole in the States. In Council of state government, Book of the state. Lexington, KY: Council of State Government.
7.
ByrneJ. M.HummerD. (2004). Examining the role of the police in reentry partnership initiatives. Federal Probation, 68(2), 62-69.
8.
ByrneJ. M.TaxmanF. SYoungD. (2002). Emerging roles and responsibilities in the reentry partnership initiative: New ways of doing business. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
9.
CorbettR. (1998). Probation blue: The promise (and perils) of probation-police partnerships. Corrections Management Quarterly, 2, 31-39.
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (2008). Successes and challenges: The CDCR story. Sacramento, CA: The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
12.
DomashS. F. (1999). Police and probation officers create effective partnerships. Police, 23(12), 22-26.
13.
DwoskinS. I.LongC. W. (1981). How police/social work teams operate. Reno, NV: National Council on Juvenile and Family Court Judges.
EvansD. G. (1997b). Enhancing public safety through a police and parole partnership. Corrections Today, 59(2), 145-147.
16.
GlaserM. A.ParkerL. E. (2001). The thin blue line meets the bottom line of community policing. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 4(1/2), 163-195.
17.
GlazeL. E.BonczarT. P. (2011). Probation and parole in the United States, 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
18.
GreenwaldR. (2009, July). Making prisoner reentry work: Reforms at the local level can help reduce recidivism. City Journal, 1-2.
19.
HughesD. K. (2000). A comparison of Paterson juveniles under probation supervision before and after implementation of the Paterson Juvenile Justice Village Initiative: Are probation/police collaborations effective models for probation supervision?Trenton, NJ: Institute for Court Management: Court Executive Development Program.
20.
KalmbachK. C. (2002). Project spotlight: The Texas interagency initiative to provide intensive probation supervision. TELEMASP Bulletin, 9, 1-7.
21.
KimB.GerberJ.BetoD. R. (2007). Collaboration between law enforcement and community corrections agencies. TELEMASP BULLETIN: Texas Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics Program, 14(1), 1-11.
22.
LeitenbergerD.SemenynaP.SpelmanJ. B. (2003). Community corrections and community policing: A perfect match. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 72(11), 20-23.
23.
MarksM. (2000). Transforming police organization from within: Police dissident groupings in South Africa. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 557-573.
24.
McKayB.ParisB. (1998). Forging a police-probation alliance. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 67(11), 27-32.
25.
MurphyD. (2005). Making police-probation partnerships work. New York: LFB Scholarly.
26.
MurphyD.LutzeF. (2009). Police-probation partnerships: Professional identity and the sharing of coercive power. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 65-76.
27.
MurphyD.WorrallJ. L. (2007). The threat of mission distortion in police-probation partnerships. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 30, 132-149.
28.
NashM. (2008). Exit the probation officer? Decoupling police and probation. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 10, 302-312.
29.
Office of Community-Oriented Policing Services. (2011). The impact of the economic downturn on American police agencies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
30.
OliverW. M. (2004). Community oriented policing: A systemic approach to policing (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
31.
PallantJ. (2001). SPSS survival manual. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
32.
ParentD.SnyderB. (1999). Police-corrections partnerships. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
33.
SchonbornK. (1976). Police and social workers as members of new crisis management teams. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 3, 679-690.
34.
SextonG. E. (2000). Working together: Assessing organizational readiness for collaboration. Knoxville, TN: The Knoxville Safety Collaboration.
