The use of force by police officers is a regular source of interest among the public, media, scholars, and criminal justice professionals. Tasers have emerged as an important and increasingly popular technology for police departments. Despite the increasing adoption and use of Tasers and the controversy surrounding their use, relatively little prior research examines the factors associated with Taser use by police officers. Guided by the focal concerns theoretical perspective, the current study uses data from a medium-size police department to analyze the factors that influence Taser use. Logistic regression models provide evidence that Taser use is influenced by suspect resistance as well as the race and gender of the suspect involved. Implications for policy and research are discussed.
AdamsK. (1996). Measuring the prevalence of police abuse of force. In GellerW. A.TochH. (Eds.), And justice for all: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force (pp. 61-98). Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
2.
AdamsK. (1999). What we know about police use of force. In DunhamR. G.AlpertG. P. (Eds.), Critical issues in policing: Contemporary readings (pp. 451-467). Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
3.
AdamsK.JennisonV. (2007). What we do not know about police use of Tasers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategy and Management, 30, 447-465.
4.
AdangO. M. J.MensinkJ. (2004). Pepper spray: An unreasonable response to suspect verbal resistance. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategy and Management, 27, 206-219.
5.
AlbonettiC. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247-266.
6.
AlbonettiC. A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law and Society Review, 31, 789-822.
BarlowD. E.BarlowM. H.ChiricosT. G. (1993). Long economic cycles and the criminal justice system in the U.S. Crime, Law and Social Change, 19, 143-169.
9.
BeckettK.SassonT. (2000). The politics of injustice: Crime and punishment in America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
Best and worst technologies: Law enforcement products from 1953-2003. (2003). Law and Order (Special Issue), 26-32.
12.
BittnerE. (1970). The functions of the police in modern society: A review of background factors, current practices, and possible role models. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
13.
BrooksL. W. (2005). Police discretionary behavior: A study of style. In DunhamR. G.AlpertG. P. (Eds.), Critical issues in policing: Contemporary readings (pp. 89-105). Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
ChiricosT.WelchK.GertzM. (2004). Racial typification of crime and support for punitive measures. Criminology, 42, 359-389.
16.
CrankJ. P. (1994). Watchman and community: Myth and institutionalization in policing. Law and Society Review, 28, 325-351.
17.
CrawfordC.BurnsR. (2008). Police use of force: Assessing the impact of time and space. Policing and Society, 18, 322-335.
18.
CrowM. S. (2008). The complexities of prior record, race and ethnicity, and offense: Interactive effects in sentencing. Criminal Justice Review, 33, 505-523.
19.
CrowM. S.BalesW. (2006). Sentencing guidelines and focal concerns: The effect of sentencing policy as a practical constraint on sentencing decisions. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 285-304.
20.
CrowM. S.GertzM. (2008). Sentencing policy and disparity: Guidelines and the influence of legal and democratic subcultures. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 362-371.
21.
DempseyJ. S.ForstL. S. (2005). An introduction to policing (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
22.
DownsR. L. (2007). Less lethal weapons: A technologist’s perspective. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategy and Management, 30, 358-384.
23.
DuffeeD. E. (1990). Explaining criminal justice: Community theory and criminal justice reform. Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
24.
DuffeeD. E.AllanE. (2007). Criminal justice, criminology, and criminal justice theory. In DuffeeD.MaguireE. (Eds.), Criminal justice theory: Explaining the nature and behavior of criminal justice (pp. 1-26). New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
DuffeeD. E.MaguireE. R. (Eds.). (2007). Criminal justice theory: Explaining the nature and behavior of criminal justice. New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
DunhamR. G.AlpertG. P. (2005). Critical issues in policing (5th ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
27.
EngelR. S.CalnonJ. M.BernardT. J. (2002). Theory and racial profiling: Shortcomings and future directions in research. Justice Quarterly, 19, 201-225.
28.
EngelR.SobolJ.WordenR. (2000). Further exploration of the demeanor hypothesis: The interaction effects of suspects’ characteristics and demeanor on police behavior. Justice Quarterly, 17, 235-258.
29.
FyfeJ. J. (1981). Observations on police deadly force. Crime & Delinquency, 27, 376-389.
30.
GarlandD. (1997). Governmentality and the problem of crime: Foucault, criminology, and sociology. Theoretical Criminology, 1, 173-214.
31.
GarlandD. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
GarnerJ. H.MaxwellC. D.HerauxC. G. (2002). Characteristics associated with the prevalence and severity of force used by the police. Justice Quarterly, 19, 705-746.
33.
Government Accountability Office. (2005). Use of Tasers by select law enforcement agencies (Publication No. GAO-05-464). Retrieved 4, 2010, from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05464.pdf
34.
GauJ. M.MosherC.PrattT. C. (2010). An inquiry into the impact of suspect race on police use of Tasers. Police Quarterly, 13, 27-48.
35.
HaganJ. (1989). Why is there so little criminal justice theory? Neglected macro- and micro-level links between organization and power. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26, 116-135.
36.
HartleyR. D.MaddenS.SpohnC. C. (2007). Concerning conceptualization and operationalization: Sentencing data and the focal concerns perspective—A research note. Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 4, 58-78.
37.
JacobsD.BrittD. (1979). Inequality and police use of deadly force: An empirical assessment of a conflict hypothesis. Social Problems, 26, 403-412.
38.
JacobsD.O’BrienR. M. (1998). The determinants of deadly force: A structural analysis of police violence. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 837-862.
39.
JohnsonB. D. (2005). Contextual disparities in guidelines departures: Courtroom social contexts, guidelines compliance, and extralegal disparities in criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 761-796.
40.
JohnsonB. D.UlmerJ. T.KramerJ. H. (2008). The social context of guidelines circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46, 737-783.
41.
KaminskiR. J.EdwardsS. M.JohnsonJ. W. (1999). Assessing the incapacitative effects of pepper spray during resistive encounters with the police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategy and Management, 22, 7-29.
42.
KlingerD. A. (2001). Suicidal intent in victim-precipitated homicide: Insights from the study of “suicide-by-cop.”Homicide Studies, 5, 206-226.
43.
KlingerD. A. (2007). Impact munitions: A discussion of key information. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 31, 385-397.
44.
KraskaP. B.BrentJ. J. (2011). Theorizing criminal justice: Eight essential orientations (2nd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
45.
LaGrangeT. C.SilvermanR. A. (1999). Low self-control and opportunity: Testing the general theory of crime as an explanation for gender differences in delinquency. Criminology, 37, 41-72.
46.
LanganP.GreenfieldL.SmithS.DuroseM.LevinD. (2001). Contacts between police and the public: Findings from the 1999 national survey. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
47.
LawtonB. A. (2007). Levels of nonlethal force: An examination of individual, situational, and contextual factors. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 163-184.
48.
LeeL. B.VittinghoffE.WhitemanD.ParkM.LauL. L.TsengZ. H. (2009). Relation of Taser (electrical stun gun) deployment to increase in in-custody sudden deaths. American Journal of Cardiology, 103, 877-880.
49.
LinY.JonesT. R. (2010). Electronic control devices and use of force outcomes: Incidence and severity of use of force, and frequency of injuries to arrestees and police officers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 33, 152-178.
50.
LiuX.KaplanH. B. (1999). Explaining the gender difference in adolescent delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of mediating mechanisms. Criminology, 37, 195-215.
51.
MacDonaldJ. M.KaminskiR. J.AlpertG. P.TannenbaumA. N. (2001). The temporal relationship between police killings of civilians and criminal homicide: A refined version of the danger-perception theory. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 155-172.
52.
MacDonaldJ. M.KaminskiR. J.SmithM. R. (2009). The effect of less-lethal weapons on injuries in police use-of-force events. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 2268-2274.
53.
MaguireE. R.UchidaC. D. (2007). Explaining police organizations. In DuffeeD.MaguireE. (Eds.), Criminal Justice Theory: Explaining the nature and behavior of criminal justice (pp. 93-119). New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
MorabitoE. V.DoernerW. G. (1997). Police use of less-than-lethal force: Oleoresin capsicum (OC) spray. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategy and Management, 20, 680-697.
PhillipsT.SmithP. (2000). Police violence occasioning citizen complaint: An empirical analysis of time-space dynamics. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 480-496.
57.
ReadyJ.WhiteM. D.FisherC. (2008). Shock value: A comparative analysis of news reports and official police records on Taser deployments. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 31, 148-170.
58.
ReissA. J.Jr. (1971). The police and the public. Forge Village, MA: Yale University.
59.
RenauerB.C. (2007). Understanding variety in urban community policing. In DuffeeD.MaguireE. (Eds.), Criminal Justice Theory: Explaining the nature and behavior of criminal justice (pp. 121-150). New York, NY: Routledge.
60.
RobertsD. E. (1993). Crime, race, and reproduction. Tulane Law Review, 67, 1945-1977.
61.
SchmallegerF.WorrallJ. L. (2010). Policing today. Upper Saddle River, NJ; Prentice Hall.
62.
SimonJ. (2007). Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
63.
SkolnickJ. H. (1966). Justice without trial: Law enforcement in a democratic society. New York, NY: John Wiley.
64.
SmithM. R.KaminskiR. J.RojekJ.AlpertG. P.MathisJ. (2007). The impact of conducted energy devices and other types of force and resistance on officer and suspect injuries. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 30, 423-446.
65.
SmithM. R.PetrocelliM.ScheerC. (2007). Excessive force, civil liability, and the Taser in the nation’s courts. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 30, 398-422.
66.
SpohnC. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. In HorneyJ.PetersonR.MacKenzieD.MartinJ.RosenbaumD. (Eds.), Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (pp. 427-501) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
67.
SteffensmeierD. (1980). Assessing the impact of the women’s movement on sex-based differences in the handling of adult criminal defendants. Crime and Delinquency, 26, 344-357.
SteffensmeierD.KramerJ.StreifelC. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31, 411-446.
70.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-797.
71.
StevensD. J. (2009). An Introduction to American Policing. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
72.
SullivanR. (1994). The tragedy of academic criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 549-558.
73.
TerrillW.LeinfeltF. H.KwakD. (2008). Examining police use of force: A smaller agency perspective. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 31, 57-76.
74.
TerrillW.MastrofskiS. D. (2002). Situational and officer-based determinants of police coercion. Justice Quarterly, 19, 215-248.
75.
TerrillW.ReisigM. D. (2003). Neighborhood context and police use of force. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 291-321.
76.
TillyerR.HartleyR. D. (2010). Driving racial profiling research forward: Learning lessons from sentencing research. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 657-665.
77.
UlmerJ. T.JohnsonB. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42, 137-177.
78.
VilkeG. M.ChanT. C. (2007). Less than lethal technology: Medical issues. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 30, 341-357.
79.
WelchS.GruhlJ.SpohnC. (1984). Sentencing: The influence of alternative measures of prior record. Criminology, 22, 215-227.
80.
WhiteM. D.ReadyJ. (2007). The Taser as a less lethal force alternative: Findings on use and effectiveness in a large metropolitan police agency. Police Quarterly, 10, 170-191.
81.
WhiteM. D.ReadyJ. (2008). The impact of the Taser on suspect resistance: Identifying predictors of effectiveness, Crime & Delinquency, 56, 70-102.
82.
WilsonJ. Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
83.
WooldredgeJ.GriffinT.RauschenbergF. (2005). (Un)anticipated effects of sentencing reform on the disparate treatment of defendants. Law and Society Review, 39, 835-873.
