This article addresses the effects of weed and seed zoning operations on arrests and calls for assistance in New Britain, Connecticut, during the 24-month before and 36-month after the inception of operations. Data are taken from New Britain police dispatch statistics and applied to a study of arrests and citizen calls for assistance across 738 U.S. Census block collection units (BCUs). The article employs tests of significance to assess the overall effects of zoning on these police activities across pre- and post-intervention periods and uses both weighted displacement quotient (WDQ) and exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA) models to test for possible displacement associated with zoning. Results indicate that weed and seed zoning was significantly associated with displacement of arrest activity in pre- and post-intervention time periods but displayed no relationship with displacement of calls for assistance (CFAs). Though WDQ analyses do not indicate proximity effects, local indicators of spatial association (LISA) maps show noteworthy changes in the spatial clustering of arrest activity over time. Of principal concern here is the idea that weed and seed may prompt changes in the geography of crime without actually reducing crime rates. An ancillary concern is whether significantly higher arrest rates within weed and seed zones represent advances in community policing.
Allatt, P. ( 1984). Residential security: Containment and displacement of burglary. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 99-116.
2.
Anselin, L. ( 1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic .
3.
Anselin, L. ( 1995a). Local indicators of spatial association-LISA . Geographical Analysis, 27, 93-115.
4.
Anselin, L. ( 1995b). New directions in spatial econometrics. New York: Springer.
5.
Anselin, L. ( 1995c). Spacestat version 1.80: User’s guide. Morgantown: West Virginia University.
6.
Barclay, P., Buckley, J., Brantingham, P.J., & Whinn-Yates, T. (1996). Preventing auto theft in suburban Vancouver Commuter Lots: a Bike Patrol. In E Clark’s (Ed.), Preventing Mass Transit Crime (pp. 133-161).
7.
Barr, R., & Pease, K. ( 1990). Crime placement, displacement, and deflection . In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (vol. 12, pp. 277-318) Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
8.
Bowers, K.J., & Johnson, S.D. ( 2003). Measuring the geographical displacement and diffusion of benefit effects of crime prevention activity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 275-301.
9.
Brensilber, D., & Krasco, K. ( 1999). Analysis of police activity and programming in the Woburn, Massachusetts weed and seed area. Boston: Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety Programs Statistical Analysis Center.
10.
Bridenball, B., & Jesilow, P. ( 2005). Weeding criminals or planting fear: An evaluation of a weed and seed project. Police Quarterly, 30, 64-89.
11.
Bridenball, B., & Jesilow, P. ( 2008). What matters: The formation of attitudes toward the police . Police Quarterly, 11, 151-181.
12.
Chapell, A.T. ( 2009). The philosophical versus actual adoption of community policing: A case study. Criminal Justice Review, 34, 5-28
13.
Clarke, R.V. ( 1992). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies. Guilderland, NYHarrow and Heston.
14.
Clarke, R., & Cornish, D. ( 1985). Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 147-185). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Clarke, R.V., & Weisburd, D.L. (1994). Diffusion of crime control benefits: Observations on the reverse of displacement. Crime Prevention Studies, 2, 165-184.
16.
Cohen, L.W., & Felson, M. ( 1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activities approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-607.
17.
Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. ( 1987). Understanding crime displacement: An application of rational choice theory. Criminology, 25, 933-947.
18.
Costanza, S.E., Bankston, W.B., & Shihadeh, E. ( 2001). Alcohol availability and violent crime rates: A spatial analysis. Journal of Crime & Justice, 24(1), 71-83.
19.
Cox, S.M. ( 1999). Final report of the evaluation of the New Britain weed and seed program. New Britain, CT: CCSU Institute for the Study of Crime and Justice.
20.
Cox, S.M., Costanza, S.E., & Ruffolo, L. ( 2007). Evaluation of the New Britain weed and seed program . New Britain, CT: CCSU Institute for the Study of Crime and Justice.
21.
Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. ( 1999). National evaluation of weed and seed. Salt Lake City case study: Research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
22.
Eck, J.E. ( 1993). The threat of crime displacement. Criminal Justice Abstracts, 25, 527-546.
23.
Gabor, T. ( 1981). The crime displacement hypothesis: An empirical examination . Crime & Delinquency, 26, 390-404.
24.
Green, L. ( 1995). Cleaning up drug hot spots in Oakland, California: The displacement and diffusion effects. Justice Quarterly , 12, 737-754.
25.
Green, L. ( 1996). Policing places with drug problems. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
Hebert, S. ( 2006). Tangled up in blue: Conflicting paths to police legitimacy . Theoretical Criminology, 10, 488-504.
27.
Helms, R., & Costanza, S.E. (2009) Race, politics and drug law enforcement: An analysis of civil asset forfeiture patterns across U.S. counties. Policing and Society, 19, 236-242.
28.
Helms, R., & Gutierrez, R. ( 2007). Federal subsides and evidence of progressive change: A quantitative assessment of the effects of targeted grants on manpower and innovation in large U.S. police agencies. Police Quarterly , 10, 87-107.
29.
Hessling, R.B.P. ( 1994). Displacement: A review of the empirical literature . In R. V. Clarke (Ed.), Crime prevention studies (pp. 197-230). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
30.
Kraska, P.B. ( 2007). Militarization and policing-Its relevance to 21st century police. Policing, 1, 501-513.
31.
Kraska, P.B., & Cubellis, L.J. (1997). Militarizing Mayberry and beyond: Making sense of American paramilitary policing. Justice Quarterly, 14, 607-629.
32.
Lord, V.B., & Friday, P.C. ( 2008) What really influences officer attitudes toward COP? The importance of context. Police Quarterly, 11, 220-238.
33.
Lurigio, A., & Rosenbaum, D. ( 1986). Evaluation research in community crime prevention: A critical look at the field. In D. P. Rosenbaum (Ed.), Community crime prevention: Does it work? (pp. 210-235), Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
34.
Maguire E.R., & Mastrofski. S.D. (2000). Patterns of community policing in the United States. Police Quarterly, 3, 4-45.
35.
Mann, E. ( 2001). Building the anti-racist, anti-imperialist united front: Theory and practice from the L.A. Strategy Center and Bus Riders Union . Souls: A Critical Journal of Black Politics, Culture and Society, 3, 87-102.
36.
Mastrofski, S., Worden, R., & Snipes, J. ( 1995). Law enforcement in a time of community policing . Criminology, 33, 539-563.
37.
Murray, R.K., & Roncek, D.W. ( 2008). Measuring diffusion of assaults around bars through radius and adjacency techniques. Criminal Justice Review, 33, 199-220.
38.
Reppetto, T. ( 1976). Crime prevention and the displacement phenomenon . Crime & Delinquency, 22, 166-177.
39.
Roehl, J. ( 1994). Evaluation of the weed and seed initiative in the United States [Data file]. ICPSR version. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Social Analysis.
40.
Roman, C.G., Cahill, M., Coggeshall, M., Lagerson, E., & Courtney, S. ( 2005). The weed and seed initiative and crime displacement in South Florida: An examination of spatial displacement associated with crime control initiatives and the redevelopment of public housing. Washington, DC: Justice Research and Statistics Association .
41.
Roncek, D.W., & Maier, P.A. ( 1991). Bars, blocks and crimes revisited: Linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of "hot spots." Criminology , 29, 725-753.
42.
Roncek, D. & Murray, R. ( 2008). Measuring Diffusion of Assaults around Bars through Radius and Adjacency Techniques. Criminal Justice Review, 33,199-220.
43.
Rosenthal, S., & Reimer, H. ( 1997). Final evaluation report for the Philadelphia weed and seed project. Philadelphia, PA: Center for Social Police and Community Development.
44.
Shoaf, L.C. ( 2005). Evaluation of the Akron weed and seed program 2000-2004 . Columbus: State of Ohio Office of Criminal Justice Services.
45.
Tilley, N., & Webb, J. ( 1994). Burglary reduction: Findings from safer cities schemes (Crime Prevention Paper #51), London: Home Office.
46.
Tobler (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234-240.
47.
Wilson, J.Q., & Kelling, G.L. ( 1982, March). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety . The Atlantic Monthly. Available from http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/198203/broken-windows/1
48.
Wisler, D., & Onwudiwe, I. ( 2008). Community policing in comparison. Police Quarterly, 11, 427-446.
