Prior research on traffic citation practices has focused largely on the influence of situational factors on officer behavior. Recent research, however, has called for a more contextualized framework for studying traffic enforcement activities. Using multilevel and spatial modeling procedures, the current study examined the role that both immediate and surrounding neighborhood characteristics played on citation issuance within a large, metropolitan department. Findings indicated that neighborhood structural characteristics were significantly related to the number of citations written during traffic encounters, independent of situational factors. Furthermore, the effect of a neighborhood's racial composition on citation issuance extended beyond the immediate neighborhood. The results lend further support to the larger body of research highlighting the importance of neighborhood context on officer behavior.
Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley .
2.
Alpert, G., Smith, M., & Dunham, R. (2004). Toward a better benchmark: Assessing the utility of not-at-fault traffic crash data in racial profiling research. Justice Research andPolicy, 6, 43-69.
3.
Anselin, L. (2002). Under the hood: Issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricultural Economics, 27, 247-267.
4.
Anselin, L. (2004). Geoda 0.9.5-i release notes. Urbana, IL: Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science .
5.
Anselin, L., Cohen, J., Cook, D., Gorr, W., & Tita, G. (2000). Spatial analysis of crime. In D. Duffee, D. McDowall, L. Mazerolle, & S. Mastrofski (Eds.) Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (Vol. 4, pp. 213-262). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
6.
Brown, R., & Frank, J. (2005). Police—citizen encounters and field citations: Do encounter characteristics influence ticketing?Policing , 28, 435-454.
7.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999). Law enforcement management and administrative statistics survey. Retrieved April 15, 2005, from http://bjsdata.ojp.usdoj.gov/dataonline/Search/Law/Law.cfm
8.
Bursik, R., & Grasmick, H. (1996). The use of contextual analysis in models of criminal behavior. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.). Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 237-267). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Engel, R. (2005). Citizens' perceptions of distributive and procedural injustice during traffic stops with police. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42, 445-481.
10.
Engel, R., & Calnon, J. (2004). Examining the influence of drivers' characteristics during traffic stops with police: Results from a national survey. Justice Quarterly, 21, 49-90.
11.
Engel, R., Calnon, J., & Bernard, T. (2002). Theory and racial profiling: Shortcoming and directions in future research. Justice Quarterly, 19, 249-273.
12.
Gardiner, J.A. (1969). Tra fic and the police: Variations in law enforcement policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Goodchild, M., Anselin, L., Appelbaum, R., & Harthorn, B. (2000). Toward spatially integrated social science. International Regional Science Review, 23, 139-159.
14.
Hedeker, D., & Gibbons, R. (2006). Longitudinal data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
15.
Hoffman, D., & Gavin, M. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management , 5, 623-641.
16.
Kubrin, C., & Stewart, E. (2006). Predicting who reoffends: The neglected role of neighborhood context in recidivism studies. Criminology, 44, 165-198.
17.
Long, J.S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Lundman, R. (1979). Organizational norms and police discretion. Criminology, 17, 159-171.
19.
Lundman, R., & Kaufman, R. (2003). Driving while Black: Effects of race, ethnicity, and gender on citizen self-reports of traffic stops and police actions. Criminology, 41, 195-220.
20.
Manning, P.K. (1977). Police work: The social organization of policing . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Mastrofski, S., Reisig, M., & McCluskey, J. (2002). Police disrespect toward the public: An encounter-based analysis. Criminology, 40, 519-551.
22.
Meehan, A.J., & Ponder, M.C. (2002). Race and place: The ecology of racial profiling African American motorists. Justice Quarterly, 19, 399-429.
23.
Morenoff, J. (2003). Neighborhood mechanisms and the spatial dynamics of birth weight. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 976-1017.
24.
Novak, K. (2004). Disparity and racial profiling in traffic enforcement . Police Quarterly, 7, 65-96.
25.
Paoline, E., & Terrill, W. (2005). The impact of police culture on traffic stop searches: An analysis of attitudes and behavior. Policing, 28, 455-472.
26.
Parker, K., MacDonald, J., Alpert, G., Smith, M., & Piquero, A. (2004). A contextual study of racial profiling. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 943-962.
27.
Petersen, D.M. (1971). Informal norms and police practice: The traffic ticket quota system. Sociology and Social Research, 55, 354-361.
28.
Petrocelli, M., Piquero, A., & Smith, M. (2003). Conflict theory and racial profiling: An empirical analysis of police traffic stop data. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 1-11.
29.
Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
30.
Reisig, M., & Parks, R. (2000). Experience, quality of life, and neighborhood context: A hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with the police. Justice Quarterly, 17, 607-630.
31.
Riksheim, E., & Chermak, S. (1993). Causes of police behavior revisited. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 353-382.
32.
Rubinstein, J. (1973). City police. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
33.
Schafer, J., & Mastrofski, S. (2005). Police leniency in traffic enforcement encounters: Exploratory findings from observations and interviews . Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 225-238.
34.
Schafer, J., Carter, D., & Katz-Bannister, A. (2004). Studying traffic stop encounters. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 159-170.
35.
Schmitt, E.L., Langan, P.A., & Durose, M.R. (2002). Characteristics of drivers stopped by police, 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
36.
Smith, D.A. (1986). The neighborhood context of police behavior. In A. J. Reiss & M. Tonry (Eds.). Communities and crime (pp. 313-341). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Smith, E.L., & Durose, M.R. (2006). Characteristics of drivers stopped by police, 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
38.
Smith, M.R., & Petrocelli, M. (2001). Racial profiling? A multivariate analysis of police traffic stop data. Police Quarterly, 4, 4-27.
39.
Terrill, W., & Reisig, M. (2003). Neighborhood context and police use of force. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 291-321.
40.
United States Bureau of the Census. (2000). Profile of general demographic characteristics: 2000. Retrieved May 28, 2003, from http://www.census.gov
41.
Van Maanen, J. (1974). Working the street: A developmental view of police behavior. In H. Jacob (Ed.). The potential for reform of criminal justice (pp. 83-130). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42.
Walker, S. (2001). Searching for the denominator: Problems with police traffic stop data and an early warning system solution. Justice Research andPolicy, 3(1), 63-95.
43.
Weitzer, R. (1999). Citizens' perceptions of police misconduct: Race and neighborhood context. Justice Quarterly, 16, 819-845.
44.
Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. (2002). Perceptions of racial profiling: Race, class, and personal experience. Criminology, 40, 435-456.
45.
Werthman, C., & Piliavin, I. (1967). Gang members and the police. In D. Bordua (Ed.). The police: Six sociological essays (pp. 56-98). New York: John Wiley .
