Research was conducted to determine the prevalence and specific provisions of policies regarding officer-involved domestic violence. First, a national sample of 78 large police agencies was surveyed, and 23 agencies (29%) indicated that they had such a specific policy. However, a number of factors suggests that this estimate is probably artificially high. Second, a total of 22 policies was analyzed with a coding structure based on the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) Model Policy. The policies varied widely in their scope, focus, and specific provisions. The most common elements were that a supervisor be immediately notified and that officers have a duty to report knowledge of domestic violence involving themselves or other employees. Most policies included very few of the provisions from the model developed by the IACP.
Baker, M. B. (2003,August 1). Court rules in favor of ex–officer.Forth Worth Star Telegram, p. 1-1.
2.
Bergen, G. T., Bourne–Lindamood, C., & Brecknock, S. (2000). Incidence of domestic violence among rural and small town law enforcement officers. In D. C. Sheehan (Ed.), Domestic violence by police officers (pp.63–73). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
3.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999).Law enforcement management and administrative statistics. Available at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/lemas99.htm
4.
Campion, M. A. (2000). Small police departments and police officer–involved domestic violence: A study. In D. C. Sheehan (Ed.),Domestic violence by police officers (pp.123–131). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
5.
Cassidy, M., Nicholl, C. G., & Ross, C. R. (2001).Results of a survey conducted by the Metropolitan Police Department of victims who reported violence against women. Executive summary published by the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department.
6.
Conis, P., & Petrzelka, P. (1999).Officer–perpetrated domestic assault: A survey of law enforcement agencies' responses to domestic violence. Research report available from the author at Des Moines Area Community College, pjconis@dmacc.edu.
7.
Culp, M. H. (2000,March). Officer–involved orders for protection: A management challenge.The Police Chief, p. 10-10.
8.
International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP). (2003).Police officer domestic violence: Concepts and issues paper. Available from www.theiacp.org
9.
Inwald, R., Traynor, W., & Favuzza, V. (2000). Psychological profiles of police and public safety officers accused of domestic violence. In D. C. Sheehan (Ed.),Domestic violence by police officers (pp.209–224). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
10.
Johnson, L. B. (1991).On the front lines: Police stress and family well–being. Hearing before the Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families, House of Representatives: 102 Congress First Session May 20 (pp. 32–48). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
11.
Kappeler, V. (1999).Kentucky's response to the Lautenberg Act: Curbing domestic violence among police. Available at www.lawenforcement.eku.edu/kjsrb/february99.html
12.
Kime, R. C. (1996, December). New federal gun ban tied to domestic violence convictions. The Police Chief, p. 10-10.
13.
Klein, R., & Klein, C. (2000). The extent of domestic violence within law enforcement: An empirical study. In D. C. Sheehan (Ed.),Domestic violence by police officers (pp.225–232). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
14.
Levinson, A. (1997,June 29). Abusers behind a badge.Arizona Republic, p. F9-F9.
15.
Mader, K. (1997).Domestic violence in the Los Angeles Police Department: How well does the Los Angeles Police Department police its own?Los Angeles: Los Angeles Police Department.
16.
Meyer, E., Hone–McMahan, K., & McKnight, K. (1999,December 5). Few lose jobs.Akron Beacon Journal, p. A1-A1.
17.
Model policy overlooks views of Chicago's in–house expert. (1998,April 30).Law Enforcement News, p. 9-9.
18.
Neidig, P. H. (1984).Spouse abuse: A causal model with assessment procedures. (Available from Behavioral Science Associates, P.O. Box 87, Stony Brook, NY). Cited in P. H. Neidig, H. E. Russell, & A. F. Seng (1992), Interspousal aggression in law enforcement families: A preliminary investigation.Police Studies,15(1), 30–38.
19.
Neidig, P. H., Russell, H. E., & Seng, A. F. (1992). Interspousal aggression in law enforcement families: A preliminary investigation.Police Studies,15(1), 30–38.
20.
Neidig, P. H., Seng, A. F., & Russell, H. E. (1992, Fall/Winter). Interspousal aggression in law enforcement personnel attending the FOP biennial conference.National FOP Journal, pp. 25–28.
21.
Omnibus Appropriations Bill, H. R. 4278, Section 658, 18 U. S. C. § 925 (1996).
22.
Prabhu, S., & Turner, N. (2000,November). Rising to the challenge: Preventing police officer domestic violence.The Police Chief, pp. 43–55.
23.
The public health and law enforcement stress. (1999,July).National Institute of Justice Journal: At–a–glance. Recent research findings (p. 27-27). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
24.
Records deleted in assault case involving Louisville policeman. (2001,November 1).Louisville Courier Journal. Available online at http://www.courier–journal.com/localnews/2001/11/01/ke110101s96957.htm
25.
Ryan, A. H. (2000). The prevalence of domestic violence in police families. In D. C. Sheehan (Ed.),Domestic violence by police officers (pp.297–307). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
26.
Southwestern Law Enforcement Institute. (1995).Domestic assaults among police: A survey of internal affairs policies. Plano, TX: Author.
27.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales.Journal of Marriage and the Family,41, 75–88.
28.
Straus, M., & Gelles, R. (1990).Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
29.
Tobar, H. (1997,May 9). 3 deputies go to court, regain right to carry guns.Los Angeles Times, p. B1-B1.
30.
Valle, G. (2000,November). Administrative orders of protection: A chief's best tool for victim safety.The Police Chief, p. 45-45.
