The behavior of officers and suspects during encounters is influenced by the actions, comments, and demeanor of the other actor. The present study looks at the interactive context of police-citizen encounters that result in the use of force. The results of the study show that police-citizen encounters are not only interactive but also asymmetrical with respect to authority. Police use- offorce interactions with civilians are more likely to involve greater levels of force by the police relative to the level of suspect resistance when a suspect appears to have less authority relative to the police officer. During an encounter, police and citizens interpret and decide how to respond to each other. This interpretive process can shape the outcome of an encounter and is an important link to the understanding of police behavior.
Adams, K. (1999). What we know about police use of force. In Use of force by police(pp. 1-14). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and Bureau of Justice Statistics.
2.
Alpert, G. P.,& Dunham, R. (1997). The force factor: Measuring police use of force relative to suspect resistance. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
3.
Alpert, G. P., Dunham, R., Kenney, D., & Smith, M. (2001). The force factor: Measuring police use of force relative to suspect resistance. A final report to the National Institute of Justice.Washington, DC.
4.
Alpert, G. P., & Smith, M. (1999). Police use-of-force data: Where we are and where we should be going. Police Quarterly, 2, 57-78.
5.
Bayley, D., & Garofalo, J. (1989). The management of violence by police patrol officers. Criminology, 27, 1-27.
6.
Binder, A.,& Scharf, P. (1980). The violent police-citizen encounter. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 452, 111-121.
7.
Black, D. (1976). The behavior of law. New York: Academic Press.
8.
Chevigny, P. (1969). Police power: Police abuses in New York City. New York: Pantheon.
9.
Dunham, R., & Alpert, G. P. (2004). The effects of officer and suspect ethnicity in use- offorce incidents. In K. Terry & D. Jones-Brown (Eds.), Policing and minority communities: Bridging the gap(pp. 102-114). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
Engel, R., Sobol, J., & Worden, R. (2000). Further exploration of the demeanor hypothesis: The interaction effects of suspects characteristics and demeanor on police behavior. Justice Quarterly, 17, 235-258.
11.
Friedrich, R. (1980). Police use of force, individuals, situations, and organizations. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 452, 82-97.
12.
Garner, J. H., Schade, T., Hepburn, J., & Buchanan, J. (1995). Measuring the continuum of force used by and against the police. Criminal Justice Review, 20, 146-168.
13.
Geller, W.,& Scott, M. (1992). Deadly force: What we know. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
14.
Geller, W.,& Toch, H. (Eds.). (1995). And justice for all. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
15.
Greenleaf, R.,& Lanza-Kaduce, L. (1995). Sophistication, organization, and authority-subject conflict: Rediscovering and unraveling Turks theory of norm resistance. Criminology, 33, 565-585.
16.
Klinger, D. (1994). Demeanor or crime: Why hostile citizens are more likely to be arrested. Criminology, 32, 475-493.
17.
Klinger, D. (1996). More on demeanor and arrest in Dade County. Criminology, 34, 61-81.
18.
Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Greenleaf, R. (1994). Police-citizen encounters: Turk on norm resistance. Justice Quarterly, 11, 605-623.
19.
Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Greenleaf, R. (2000). Age, and race deference reversals: Extending Turk on police-citizen conflict. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 37, 221-236.
20.
Lundman, R. (1974). Routine police arrest practices. Social Problems, 22, 127-141.
21.
Lundman, R. (1994). Demeanor or crime: The Midwest City police-citizen encounters study. Criminology, 32, 631-656.
22.
Molm, L., Peterson, G., & Takahashi, N. (1999). Power in negotiated and reciprocal exchange. American Sociological Review, 64, 876-890.
23.
Roberg, R., Crank, J., & Kuykendall, J. (2000). Police and society. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing.
24.
Sherman, L. (1980). Perspectives on police and violence. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 452, 1-12.
25.
Smith, D. (1986). The neighborhood context of police behavior. In A. Reiss & M. Tonry (Eds.), Communities and crime(pp. 314-341). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Sykes, R.,& Clark, J. (1975). A theory of deference exchange in police-civilian encounters. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 584-600.
27.
Terrill, W. (2001). Police coercion: Application of the force continuum. New York: LFBPublishing.
28.
Turk, A. (1966). Conflict and criminality. American Sociological Review, 31, 338-352.
29.
Walker, S. (2001). Police accountability. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
30.
Worden, R. (1995). The causes of police brutality: Theory and evidence on police use of force. InW. Geller & H. Toch (Eds.), And justice for all: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force(pp. 31-60). Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
31.
Worden, R., & Shepard, R. (1996). Demeanor, crime and police behavior: A reexamination of the Police Services Study data. Criminology, 34, 83-105.
