This article examines the literature on the physical demands of police work, the use of physical agility testing in police selection, and women's performance as police officers. A survey was conducted with 62 police agencies regarding their physical agility test and the representation of sworn women. Results indicate that the vast majority (89%) of agencies use some form of physical agility testing for entry-level selection, and agencies with a test have 31% fewer sworn women than agencies without such a test (15.8% vs. 10.9%). Results also demonstrate a striking lack of agreement regarding the physical capabilities that should be tested and the standards that should be used to evaluate successful performance. In light of these results, women's proven ability to perform as police officers, and the legal requirements of preemployment testing, the article concludes by reviewing alternatives for physical agility testing in police officer selection.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agha, M. (2001, August 21). America's cops packing on the pounds. St.Paul Pioneer Press.
2.
Alspaugh v. Michigan Law Enforcement Officers Training Council, 246 Mich. App. 547 (2001).
3.
Arvey, R. D., Landon, T. E., Nutting, S. M., & Maxwell, S. E. (1992). Development of physi-cal ability tests for police officers: A construct validation approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(6), 996-1009.
4.
Arvey, R. D., Nutting, S. M., & Landon, T. E. (1992). Validation strategies for physical ability testing in police and fire settings. Public Personnel Management, 21(3), 301-312.
5.
Ash, P., Slora, K. B., & Britton, C. F. (1990). Police agency officer selection practices. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 17(4), 258-269.
6.
Barbera et al. v. Metro Dade County Fire Department, 177 F. Supp. 2d 1331, S.D. Florida (2000).
7.
Berkman v. City of New York, 536 F. Supp. 177 (E.D.N.Y. 1982), aff'd, 705 F.2d 584 (2d. Cir. 1983).
8.
Berner, J. G., & Kohls, J. W. (1982). Patrol officer physical performance testing manual. Sacramento: California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (Califor-nia POST).
9.
Birzer, M. L., & Craig, D. E. (1996). Gender differences in police physical ability test performance. American Journal of Police, 15(2), 93-108.
10.
Blake v. City of Los Angeles, 595 F.2d 1367 (9th Cir. 1979).
11.
Brant et al. v. City of Columbus et al. No. C-2-75-425, 1978 U.S. Dist LEXIS 15109, (S.D. Ohio Oct. 5, 1978).
Burney v. City of Pawtucket, 559 F. Supp. 1089 (D.R.I. 1983).
15.
California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (California POST). (1996). Basic academy physical conditioning manual. Sacramento, CA: Author.
16.
California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (California POST). (2001). California law enforcement officers killed and assaulted in the line of duty: 1995-1999 report. Sacramento, CA: Author
17.
Carmean, G. (1984, January). Police management considerations of physical capacity screening. The Police Chief, 51(1), 42-44.
18.
Cassidy, M., Nicholl, C. J., & Ross, C. R. (2001) Results of a survey conducted by the Metropolitan Police Department of victims who reported violence against women (Executive Summary). Washington, DC: DC Metropolitan Police Department.
19.
Charles, M. T. (1982). Women in policing: The physical aspect. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 10(2), 194-205.
20.
Charles, M. T. (1983). Police training: A contemporary approach. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 11(3), 251-263.
21.
Cordner, G. W. (1980). Job analysis and the police: Benefits and limitations. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 8(3), 355-362.
22.
Craig v. County of Los Angeles, 626 F.2d 659 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied 450 U.S. 919 (1981).
23.
Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977).
24.
Evans, D. H. (1980). Height, weight, and physical agility requirements—Title VII and public safety employment. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 8(4), 414-436.
25.
Farenholtz, D. W., Peak, K., & Rhodes, E. C. (1995). Eugene and Springfield, Oregon: Police officers' physical abilities study development of POPAT. Unpublished report pre-pared by DWF Consultants, Ltd. for Eugene and Springfield, Oregon Police Departments.
26.
Farenholtz, D. W., & Rhodes, E. C. (1990). Recommended Canadian standards for police physical abilities. Canadian Police College Journal, 14(1), 37-49.
27.
Faulkner, S. D. (1994). A Ralph Nader approach to law enforcement training: Subject con-trol—unsafe at any speed. Police Studies, 17(3), 21-32.
28.
FitForce. (1997, April). Validation of physical fitness standards for the Idaho Department of Law Enforcement Peace Officers Standards and Training Academy. Unpublished report, Idaho POST.
29.
Franz v. Kernan, 951 F. Supp. 159 (E.D. Mo. 1996).
30.
Fry, L. W., & Greenfeld, S. (1980). An examination of attitudinal differences between policewomen and policemen. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 123-126.
31.
Gaines, L. K., Falkenberg, S., & Gambino, J. A. (1993). Police physical agility testing: An historical and legal analysis. American Journal of Police, 12(4), 47-66.
32.
Greenberg, G. J., & Berger, R. A. (1983). A model to assess one's ability to apprehend and restrain a resisting suspect in police work. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 25(11), 809-813.
33.
Grennan, S. A. (1987). Findings on the role of officer gender in violent encounters with citi-zens. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15, 78-85.
34.
The Guardians Association of the New York City Police Department, Inc. v. Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, 630 F.2d 79 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 940 (1981).
35.
Harless v. Duck, 619 F.2d 611 (6th Cir. 1980).
36.
Hernandez, E. (1983). Physical agility remedial training. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 11(1), 42-45.
37.
Hogan, J. C. (1991). Physical abilities. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, 2nd ed., chapter 11, pp. 753-831). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
38.
Hogan, J., & Quigley, A. M. (1986). Physical standards for employment and the courts. American Psychologist, 41(11), 1193-1217.
39.
Homant, R., & Kennedy, D. (1985). Police perceptions of spouse abuse: A comparison of male and female officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 13, 29-47.
40.
Hoover, L. T. (1992). Trends in police physical ability selection testing. Public Personnel Management, 21, 29-40.
41.
In Re: Grievance of Scott, 779 A.2d 655 (Vt. 2001).
42.
Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department. (1991). Report of the In-dependent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department: Summary. Los Angeles: Author.
43.
International City Managers Association (ICMA). (1990). Baseline data report. ICMA, 23(5), 6.
44.
Johnson, L. B. (May 20, 1991). On the front lines: Police stress and family well-being. Hearing before the Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families, House of Representatives: 102 Congress First Session (pp. 32-48). Washington DC: Government Printing Office.
45.
Korte, G. (2002, March 28). Changes for Cincinnati police outlined in draft. Cincinnati Enquirer.
46.
Krueger, K., & Berner, J. (1995). Review of work site health and fitness programs (Clearing-house Report No. 1). Sacramento: California POST.
47.
Landy, Jacob, & Associates. (1993, October). Final report: Austin Police Department job analysis and physical abilities testing. Unpublished report, Austin Police Department, Austin, TX.
48.
Lanning v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 181 F. 3d 478 (3rd Cir. 1999).
49.
Lanning v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 308 F. 3d 286 (3rd Cir. 2002).
50.
Legault v. aRusso (1994). 842 F. Supp. 1979 (D.N.H.).
51.
Lilley, J. H., & Greenberg, S. F. (1984, January). Physical training program addresses long-term attitudes toward fitness. The Police Chief, 51(1), 47-49.
52.
Lonsway, K., Wood, M., & Spillar, K. (2002, December). Officer gender and excessive force. Law & Order, 50(12), 60-66.
53.
Maher, P. T. (1984). Police physical ability tests: Can they ever be valid? Public Personnel Management Journal, 13(2), 173-183.
54.
Martin, S. E., & Jurik, N. J. (1996). Doing justice, doing gender: Women in law and criminal justice occupations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
Mealey, M. (1979). New fitness for police and fire fighters. Physician and Sports Medicine, 7, 96-100.
56.
Moulson-Litchfeld, M., & Freedson, P. S. (1986). Physical training programs for public safety personnel. Clinics in Sports Medicine, 5, 571-587.
57.
National Center for Women & Policing. (2000). Recruiting and retaining women: A self-assessment guide for law enforcement. Prepared by the National Center for Women & Policing, a division of the Feminist Majority Foundation, with funding from the Bureau of Justice Assistance (Grant No. 99-LD-VX-0003; NCJ No. 188157). Retrieved from www.ncjrs.org
58.
National Center for Women & Policing. (2002). Equality denied: The status of women in policing 2001. Prepared by the National Center for Women & Policing, a division of the Feminist Majority Foundation. Retrieved from www.womenandpolicing.org
59.
Neidig, P., Russell, H., & Seng, A. (1992). Interspousal aggression in law enforcement families: A preliminary investigation. Police Studies, 15, 30-38.
60.
Neidig, P. H., Seng, A. F., & Russell, H. E. (1992, fall/winter). Interspousal aggression in law enforcement personnel attending the FOP biennial conference. National FOP Journal, pp. 25-28.
61.
Norvell, N., & Belles, D. (1993). Psychological and physical benefits of circuit weight training in law enforcement personnel. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(3), 520-527.
62.
Officers for Justice v. Civil Service Commission of the City and County of San Francisco, 979 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1992).
63.
Parker v. District of Columbia, 850 F.2d 708 (1988).
64.
Peak, K., Farenholtz, D. W., & Coxey, G. (1992). Physical abilities testing for police officers: A flexible job-related approach. The Police Chief, 61(1), 51-56.
65.
Peanick v. Reno, No. 95-2594 (8th Cir. 1994).
66.
Perlstein, G. R. (1972). Policewomen & policemen: A comparative look. The Police Chief, 39, 72-74.
67.
Police Education Advisory Council. (1998, August). Police for the future: Review of recruitment and selection for the Queensland Police Service. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Police Service.
68.
Powell v. Reno, C.A. 96-2743, NHJ, slip op. at 6 (D.D.C. July 24, 1997).
69.
Prenzler, T. (1996). Rebuilding the walls? The impact of police pre-entry physical ability tests on female applicants. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 7(3), 314-324.
70.
Pynes, J., & Bernardin, H. J. (1992). Entry-level police selection: The assessment center is an alternative. Journal of Criminal Justice, 20, 41-52.
71.
Rhodes, E. C., & Farenholtz, D. W. (1992). Police officers' physical abilities test compared to measures of physical fitness. Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences, 17(3), 228-233.
72.
Shephard, R. J. (1986). Fitness and health in industry (pp. 223-256). New York: Karger.
73.
Sherman, L. J. (1975). An evaluation of policewomen on patrol in a suburban police department. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 3, 434-438.
74.
Snortum, J. R., & Byers, J. C. (1983). Patrol activities of male and female officers as a function of work experience. Police Studies, 6, 63-72.
75.
Stanard & Associates Inc. (1997). An investigation of police officer morale. Chicago: Author. (Available from the author at www.stanard.com)
76.
Stanish, H. I., Wood, T. M., & Campagna, P. (1999). Prediction of performance on the RCMP physical ability requirement evaluation. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 41(8), 669-677.
77.
Straus, M., & Gelles, R. (1990). Physical violence in American families—risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Summers, W. C. (1985, February). Title VII challenges to physical fitness requirements. The Police Chief, 52(2), 13.
80.
Tennessee v. Garner, No. 83-1035, 471 U.S. 1; 105 S. Ct. 1694; 85 L. Ed. 2d 1; 1985 U.S. LEXIS 195; 53 U.S.L.W. 4410 (March 27, 1985).
81.
Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education. (2000, July). Survey report on the activities of Texas Law Enforcement Agencies 1999. Retrieved from www.tcleose.state.tx.us
82.
Thomas, & Means (1999, October 1). Validation of police physical fitness standards for the Utah Risk Management Mutual Association: Final report. Huntersville, NC: Author.
83.
Thomas v. City of Evanston, 610 F. Supp. 422 (N.D. Ill. 1985).
84.
Townsey, R. D. (1992). Female patrol officers: A review of the physical capacity issue. In B. R. Price & N. J. Sokoloff (Eds.). The criminal justice system and women: Women offenders, victims, and workers (Chapter 23, pp. 413-425). New York: Clark Boardman.
85.
United States v. City of Philadelphia, 21 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 930314 (1979).
86.
United States v. City of Wichita Falls, 704 F. Supp. 709 (N.D. Tex. 1988).
87.
United States v. New York, 21 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 30314 (N.D. N.Y. 1979).
88.
Wiener, J. (1994). Physical abilities test: Follow-up validation study. Sacramento: Califor-nia POST.
89.
Wiles, D. (1986). The effects of annual fitness testing in a large metropolitan police depart-ment [Abstract]. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 11(3), 47.
90.
Wilmore, J. H., & Davis, J. A. (1979). Validation of a physical abilities field test for the selection of state traffic officers. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 21(1), 33-40.
91.
Witczak, T. J. (1984, January). Physical fitness with a pay incentive. The Police Chief, 51(1), 50-51.
92.
Wood, S. D., Kreitner, R., Friedman, G. M., Edwards, M., & Sova, M. A. (1982). Cost-effective wellness screening: A case study of 4,524 law enforcement officers. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 10(3), 273-278.
93.
Worden, A. P. (1993). The attitudes of women and men in policing: Testing conventional and contemporary wisdom, Criminology, 31(2), 203-236
94.
Worden, R. E. (1995). The causes of police brutality: Theory and evidence on police use of force. In W. A. Geller & H. Toch (Ed.), And justice for all: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force (pp. 31-60). Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
