Each year, the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) accepts nominations for the prestigious Herman Goldstein Award for Excellence in Problem-Oriented Policing. This article examines problem-oriented initiatives that have been selected by PERF as innovations deserving recognition. The authors review the characteristics of these projects beginning in 1993, the inaugural year of the Goldstein Award. They review such characteristics as the nature of the problem, the nature of the intervention, and the integration of SARA (scanning, analysis, response, & assessment) model principles. These characteristics are examined to provide insight into what is being presented as innovative, award-winning practices in problem-oriented policing. The responses examined are framed in the context of programmatic and techniquelevel innovations. Discussion is given to the prospect of these innovative approaches becoming institutional practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baldridge, J. V., &. Burnham, R. A. (1975). Organizational innovation: Industrial, organizational, and environmental impact. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 165-176.
2.
Berg, B. L. (2000). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D., Warring, E. J., Mazerolle, L. G., Spelman, W., & Gajewski, F. (1999). Problem-oriented policing in violent crime places: A randomized controlled experiment. Criminology, 37, 541-579.
4.
Crank, J. P. (1998). Understanding police culture. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
5.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555-590.
6.
Downs, G., & Mohr, L. (1976). Conceptual issues in the study of innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 700-714.
7.
Eck, J. E. (1993). Alternative futures for policing. In D. Weisburd & C. Uchida (Eds.), Police innovation and control of the police (pp. 59-79). New York: Springer-Verlag.
8.
Eck, J. E., & Spelman, W. (1987). Problem solving: Problem-oriented policing in Newport News. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Police Executive Research Forum.
9.
Goldstein, H. (1979). Improving policing: A problem-oriented approach. Crime & Delinquency, 25, 236-258.
10.
Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
Green, L. (1996). Policing places with drug problems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Greene, J. (2000). Community policing in America: Changing the nature, structure and function of the police. In J. Horney (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000 (pp. 299-370). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
13.
Guyot, D. (1979). Bending granite: Attempts to change the rank structure of American police departments. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 7, 253-284.
14.
Hope, T. (1994). Problem-oriented policing and drug market locations: Three case studies. Crime Prevention Studies, 2, 5-32.
15.
Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organization, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 689-713.
16.
King, W. R. (2000). Measuring police innovation: Issues and measurement. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Sciences, 23, 303-317.
17.
Mastrofski, S. D. (1998). Community policing and police organizational structure. In J. P. Brodeur (Ed.), How to recognize good policing: Problems and issues (pp. 161-189). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Matthews, R. (1990). Developing more effective strategies to curb prostitution. Security Journal, 1, 182-187.
19.
Mazerolle, L. G., Ready, J., Terrill, W., & Warring, E. (2000). Problem-oriented policing in public housing: The Jersey City evaluations. Justice Quarterly, 17, 129-158.
20.
Moore, M. H., Sparrow, M., & Spelman, W. (1996). Innovation in policing: From production lines to job shops. In A. A. Altshuler & R. D. Behn (Eds.), Innovation in American government (pp. 274-298). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
21.
National Institute of Justice. (2000). Excellence in problem-oriented policing: The 2000 Herman Goldstein Award winners. Washington, DC: Author.
22.
Police Executive Research Forum. (1999). Request for proposals for 1999 Herman Goldstein Award. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Police Executive Research Forum.
23.
Police Executive Research Forum. (2000). National evaluation of the Problem-Solving Partnership(PSP) project. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Police Executive Research Forum.
24.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
25.
Sadd, S., & Grinc, R. M. (1996). Implementation challenges in community policing: Innovative neighborhood-oriented policing in eight cities. Research in Brief. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
26.
Scott, M. (2000). Problem-oriented policing: Reflections on the first 20 years. U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office.
27.
Sherman, L. W. (1995). The police. In J. Q. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime (pp. 327-348). San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
28.
Skogan, W. G., & Hartnett, S. M. (1997). Community policing: Chicago style. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
