Do patrol sergeants' supervisory styles influence patrol officer behavior? This question is addressed by examining data collected for the Project on Policing Neighborhoods, a systematic observational study of patrol officers and first-line supervisors in two metropolitan police departments in 1996 and 1997. Using four distinct supervisory styles created through factor analysis of attitudinal constructs identified in the management and policing literatures, the influence of different supervisory styles over patrol officer behaviors—arrest, use of force, and issuing citations—is assessed. Findings show that at least one supervisory style has a significant influence over the likelihood that officers will use force against suspects. Furthermore, the presence of a supervisor (regardless of supervisory style) significantly increases the likelihood that officers will arrest. Implications for policy and future research are explored.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, D. (1980). Street-level police supervision: the effect of supervision on police officer activities, agency outputs, and neighborhood outcomes. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
2.
Allen, D. (1982). Police supervision on the street: an analysis of supervisor/officer interaction during the shift. Journal of Criminal Justice, 10, 91-109.
3.
Allen, D. , & Maxfield, M. (1983). Judging police performance: views and behavior of patrol officers. In R. Bennett (Ed.), Police at work: policy issues and analysis (pp. 65-86). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
Bayley, D. H. (1994). Police for the future. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Bittner, E. (1983). Legality and workmanship: introduction to control in the police organization. In M. Punch (Ed.), Control in the police organization (pp. 1-11). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Brehm, J. , & Gates, S. (1993). Donut shops and speed traps: evaluating models of supervision on police behavior. American Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 69-78.
7.
Brown, M. K. (1988). Working the street: police discretion and the dilemmas of reform. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
8.
Bureau of Justice Statistics . (1996). In K. Maguire & A. Pastore (Eds.), Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 1995. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
9.
Cohen, B. (1980). Leadership styles of commanders in the New York City Police Department. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 8(2), 125-138.
10.
DeJong, C. , Mastrofski, S. D., & Parks, R. B. (in press). Patrol officers and problem solving: An application of expectancy theory. Justice Quarterly.
11.
Engel, R. S. (in press-a). Supervisory styles of patrol sergeants and lieutenants. Journal of Criminal Justice.
12.
Engel, R. S. (in press-b). Patrol officer supervision in the community policing era. Journal of Criminal Justice.
13.
Gates, S. , & Worden, R. (1989, August 31-September 3). Principle-agent models of hierarchical control in public bureaucracies: work, shirking, and supervision in police agencies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia.
14.
Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15.
Jermier, J. M. , & Berkes, L. J. (1979). Leader behavior in a police command bureaucracy: A closer look at the quasi-military model. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 1-23.
16.
Klinger, D. (1994). Demeanor or crime? Why “hostile” citizens are more likely to be arrested. Criminology, 32, 475-493.
17.
Lundman, R. J. (1979). Organizational norms and police discretion: an observational study of police work with traffic law violators. Criminology, 17, 159-171.
18.
Manning, P. K. (1977). Police work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
Mark, J. (1976). Police organizations: The challenges and dilemmas of change. In A. Niederhoffer & A. Blumberg (Eds.), The ambivalent force: perspectives on the police (pp. 356-366). Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
20.
Mastrofski, S. D. , Ritti, R., & Snipes, J. B. (1994). Expectancy theory and police productivity in DUI enforcement. Law & Society Review, 28, 113-148.
21.
Mastrofski, S. D. , Snipes, J. B., Parks, R. B., & Maxwell, C. D. (2000). The helping hand of the law: Police control of citizens on request. Criminology, 38, 307-342.
22.
Muir, W., Jr. (1977). Police: Street corner politicians. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
23.
Parks, R. B. , Mastrofski, S. D., DeJong, C., & Gray, M. K. (1999). How officers spend their time with the community. Justice Quarterly, 16, 483-518.
24.
Pursley, R. D. (1974). Leadership and community identification attitudes among two categories of police chiefs: An exploratory inquiry. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 2(4), 414-422.
25.
Reisig, M. D. , & Parks, R. B. (2000). Experience, quality of life, and neighborhood context: A hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with police. Justice Quarterly, 17, 607-629.
26.
Reiss, A. J., Jr. (1971). The police and the public. New Haven, CT: Yale.
27.
Reuss-Ianni, E. , & Ianni, F. A. (1983). Street cops and management cops: The two cultures of policing. In M. Punch (Ed.), Control in the police organization (pp. 251-274). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
Rubinstein, J. (1973). City police. New York: Ballantine.
29.
Sampson, R. J. , Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
30.
Sherman, L. , Milton, C. and Kelley, T. (1973). Team policing: seven case studies. Washington, D.C.: Police Foundation.
31.
Smith, D. (1984). The organizational context of legal control. Criminology, 22, 19-38.
32.
Smith, D. A. , & Klein, J. R. (1983). Police agency characteristics and arrest decisions. In G. P. Whitaker & C. D. Phillips (Eds.), Evaluating performance of criminal justice agencies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
Sparrow, M. K. , Moore, M. H., & Kennedy, D. M. (1990). Beyond 911: A new era for policing. New York: Basic Books.
34.
Tifft, L. (1971). Comparative police supervision systems: an organizational analysis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
35.
Tifft, L. (1975). Control systems, social bases of power and power exercise in police organizations. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 3, 66-76.
36.
Trojanowicz, R. C. (1980). The environment of the first-line police supervisor. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
Van Maanen, J. (1983). The boss: First-line supervision in an American police agency. In M. Punch (Ed.), Control in the police organization (pp. 275-317). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
Van Maanen, J. (1984). Making rank: Becoming an American police sergeant. Urban Life, 13, 155-176.
39.
Walker, S. (1993). Does anyone remember team policing? Lessons of the team policing experience for community policing. American Journal of Police, 12, 33-55.
40.
Weisburd, D. , McElroy, J., & Hardymann, P. (1988). Challenges to supervision in community policing: Observations on a pilot project. American Journal of Police, 7, 29-50.
41.
Wilson, J. Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Witte, J. H. , Travis, L. F. III, & Langworthy, R. H. (1990). Particpatory management in law enforcement: Police officer, supervisor and administrator perceptions. American Journal of Police, 9(4), 1-23.
43.
Wycoff, M. A. , & Skogan, W. G. (1994). The effect of community policing management style on officers' attitudes. Crime & Delinquency. 40(3), 371-383.
